Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2012, 06:31 AM
  #86751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wingnutdal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
SWEET! So we will see DALPA open with 8% and perhaps settle into that 3-5% range. We win!! Thanks for the nice pin though.
What was the spin on that? I swear that the more you DPA guys come on here with your ****y attitudes the more people you're going to lose.

I think that our pilot group in general has no idea how a section 6 works, what it involves, the time it takes, and the actual chances of being released. But you guys keep talking tough, you know more than anyone else, and can get everything all 12,000 pilots want.

God D@&$(&@!
Wingnutdal is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:32 AM
  #86752  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by get there itis
It's not 60 new frames. We're retiring some A320's & some domestic 767's too. I believe it's 85 retirements so 15 additional frames. I'm guessing the A320's on operating leases are the ones to go.
OK, thanks. I had never seen that number.

Of course, it's also a question of timing. If the retirements occur faster, then we shrink for a while. If they occur slower than deliveries, we grow for a while, until we roll into another period of deliveries and retirements. So even the 15 number can feel like 0, just as much as it can feel like 50, at any given time.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:37 AM
  #86753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The two contracts were carefully compared by both committees. The average total hours paid under each contract during the 3 years prior to the merger were within .5 hours of each other with the Delta contract slightly higher. You can ask the people involved at NW for the exact numbers Carl.
Yes NW had some aspects that produced increases Delta did not have. However Delta had a bunch of aspects to their contract NW did not have. Examples include a higher reserve guarantee for NW. However that was offset by reroute pay, reserve duty period lookback, additional pay for long call trips under 12 hours, pay on top of the guarantee for GS flying ect..
NW got limited pay above 80 hours at time and a half however it was not as posted often on all flying. There was a system that for practical purposes limited the hours depending on the caps. Delta paid double pay on all GS flying. In the end when everything was added up each contract produced essentially the same pay hours per month per pilot.
The Delta 1113 contract was however much shorter duration then the NW contract with higher rates. The much shorter duration of the Delta contract was a critical item. Carl claims he made more as a NW pilot but the facts don't support his case.
Premerger the NW pay rate on the 757 as a example was 142 dollars an hour. There were some small raise built into the NW contract so the rate today would be around 148 to 150. I don't have the exact numbers. The rate in effect today with the joint contract is 189 an hour or over 25 percent higher.
Carl was getting 177 an hour at the merger as a 747 Captain. He currently with international pay is getting 231.75 an hour. He is also getting a additional 1 percent a hour into retirement which will jump to 14 percent in 11 months or an additional 32 dollars an hour if Carl was a 0 percenter in the NW matrix. That would bring his total raise on 1 Jan 13 to 87 dollars an hour. With the raises in the NW contract he will still be 80 dollars an hour ahead.
Interesting, I thought I read that we just adopted a "mature contract" when I was reading the voting material. In other words, this is the first I read of any analysis vs taking one contract and running with it.

It's good that it was modeled and I believe what you've got up there for comparisons but I also agree with Carl that it was just last year that I broke even $$ wise and I've got the tax returns to prove it.

NOW, and before you beat me up......THE THING THAT IS GOOD ABOUT THE JOINT CONTRACT is that it recovered some duty period credits and rigs we had lost in BK. So, my 14 Asia trip went back down to 12....a very good thing.

But, that said, the Asia trips were built to over 80 so time and a half out of the gate and when I flew domestically I had a minimum day. I don't know for sure, but I think those are maybe the differences.

Overall, this is a BS discussion as they were both BS bankruptcy contracts.

JMHO,
Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:38 AM
  #86754  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by Wingnutdal
What was the spin on that? I swear that the more you DPA guys come on here with your ****y attitudes the more people you're going to lose.

I think that our pilot group in general has no idea how a section 6 works, what it involves, the time it takes, and the actual chances of being released. But you guys keep talking tough, you know more than anyone else, and can get everything all 12,000 pilots want.

God D@&$(&@!
Well nut, maybe I should hang out here more then. I'm going to let you in on a secret! Shhhh. Don't tell anyone, o. k.? Not a DPA member, really.

And go take a baby asprin before you stroke out. It's a forum genius.
TheManager is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:44 AM
  #86755  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wingnutdal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Well nut, maybe I should hang out here more then. I'm going to let you in on a secret! Shhhh. Don't tell anyone, o. k.? Not a DPA member, really.

And go take a baby asprin before you stroke out. It's a forum genius.
Throw some stones, I don't believe you and don't think much of you.
Wingnutdal is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:54 AM
  #86756  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Launchpad475's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: SEA7ERB
Posts: 177
Default

The first 40-50 320's are older that crap, they are part of the -900 replacement order too is my understanding from the 320 LCA types-
Launchpad475 is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:56 AM
  #86757  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,745
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Of course, it's also a question of timing. If the retirements occur faster, then we shrink for a while. If they occur slower than deliveries, we grow for a while, until we roll into another period of deliveries and retirements. So even the 15 number can feel like 0, just as much as it can feel like 50, at any given time.
Yep, I think so too. Depends on the economy and whether there are profitable routes for those 757s compared to the economics of the 737-900s.

Delta was going to get rid of the older 5500 series 757s, then someone decided we can use them to LAS and MCO. Must of been profitable to keep them on -> good for us pilots.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:07 AM
  #86758  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Many folks that I fly with believe that we left some low hanging fruit on the tree with LOA 19 and the Joint contract. Yes, the merger would of happened anyways, we all realize that. What would not of happened however is the mess that is our scope clause. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the 255 70 seat RJ's would not of been allowed under our previous PWA. The Alaska codeshare would not of been allowed. No?

Other folks think that for our cooperation and sacrifices we should of gotten more pay up front. I can't argue with that either. Our leverage, was that they needed us to get this merger done right (scope, codeshare allowances) and we gave those allowances for minimal pay increases and we still allowed more outsourcing.

Looking to the future most guys want job protections in regard to the JV's and codeshare. Not a repeat of a contract with minimal pay increases only to see more flying outsourced.
I have a question for you. And this is not a grenade or flamebait.. but an honest question. If, as you (and others) believe that we left "low hanging fruit" in LOA 19 and the JCBA, how is it that you would a) identify said fruit, and b) find the step ladder that you need to get it? Hindsight is 20/20.. we all know that, and we always have the luxury of looking back and critiquing. How would you propose ensuring that we leave no fruit on the tree in section 6?
tsquare is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:08 AM
  #86759  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
If a weak TA is even offered by ALPA, they are mostly likely GONE, and Slowplay and other MEC members KNOW IT.
Big words. Define weak.
tsquare is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:15 AM
  #86760  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Please show your math on that.
Even if he were exaggerating by a factor of 10, we are still above any of the others you mentioned.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices