Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2012, 09:41 AM
  #86451  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: erb
Posts: 646
Default AngryPilotWife

Originally Posted by slowplay
That hurt. I guess I'll go drop a pine tree in my neighbors house, then run to the bar and think about it!

Nice blog, btw. Your wife writes well.
Thank you Slow! By reading AngryPilotWife...for comic relief...we are proud to be supporting "Friends of Mel". That's a big honor. Thanks for reading, and if we still make ya laugh, please share the site w/ friends outside Delta. Cheers..
Herman is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:03 AM
  #86452  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
How do you figure this? The company can not hold back time during the bidding process and must award as many lines as possible.
PBS could use what is called a "global solution" to enable more people to hold lines.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:09 AM
  #86453  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,745
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
PBS could use what is called a "global solution" to enable more people to hold lines.
By "global solution" do you mean taking a good trip a senior pilot wants and giving it to a junior pilot so he/she can have a line? I'm pretty sure DALPA doesn't allow that.

If the TLV was raised as part of raising reserve guarantee, then there would be higher ALVs and maybe less reserves needed too, but there would be less lines too. Less pilots needed too.

Less pilots means that some the junior reserve guys asking for higher guarantee would be bumped off their aircraft and displaced to a different aircraft or base. Some people on the junior equipment would be displaced to the street. (barring a political decision to keep manning fat for future growth).

Everything is interconnected.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:25 AM
  #86454  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
By "global solution" do you mean taking a good trip a senior pilot wants and giving it to a junior pilot so he/she can have a line? I'm pretty sure DALPA doesn't allow that.

If the TLV was raised as part of raising reserve guarantee, then there would be higher ALVs and maybe less reserves needed too, but there would be less lines too. Less pilots needed too.

Less pilots means that some the junior reserve guys asking for higher guarantee would be bumped off their aircraft and displaced to a different aircraft or base. Some people on the junior equipment would be displaced to the street. (barring a political decision to keep manning fat for future growth).

Everything is interconnected.
Or you could look at it as giving more people a shot at a line for better QOL.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:35 AM
  #86455  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: B744 F/O
Posts: 141
Default

How about we increase pay rates so someone can live on 65 hours on reserve.
trlaketige is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:07 AM
  #86456  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,745
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Or you could look at it as giving more people a shot at a line for better QOL.
But it abrogates senority. A senior pilot should be able to pick his trips without regard to the junior pilot's schedule. The regionals do this and it makes for a very poor PBS system. I'm very junior in my category (87% or so) and would NOT want this kind of PBS logic.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:12 AM
  #86457  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
But it abrogates senority. A senior pilot should be able to pick his trips without regard to the junior pilot's schedule. The regionals do this and it makes for a very poor PBS system. I'm very junior in my category (87% or so) and would NOT want this kind of PBS logic.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This would be similar to the software that CAL uses. Ask any of their folks how they like it.
Rather B Fishin is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:36 AM
  #86458  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
PBS could use what is called a "global solution" to enable more people to hold lines.
No thanks. The true benefficiary in such an arrangement is the company, which makes the people on the other end of the transaction (pilots) the true losers.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 12:19 PM
  #86459  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
Thank goodness for the -9 then!
They will all be retired by 12-21-2012. Coincidence?
gloopy is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 12:26 PM
  #86460  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Or you could look at it as giving more people a shot at a line for better QOL.
I'm on reserve and have not flown once this month....I'd say QOL is pretty good. Increase reserve to pay industry standard and QOL will go up. With better reserve pay more senior in base pilots would bid it and then the junior guys would have their shot at a line.

My 2¢.
capncrunch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices