Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
ACL,
I don't doubt ATL 777 might move out completely, but couldn't the size of ATL 777 and DTW 777 be flipped vs closing ATL 777?
I ask, because what else would do a route like ATL-NRT?
FWIW 777 routes (by my best count, I might be missing some):
ATL-DTW
ATL-LAX
ATL-DXB
ATL-JNB
ATL-NRT
DTW-ICN
DTW-PVG
DTW-PEK
DTW-HKG
NRT-HKG
NRT-SIN
NRT-TPE
NRT-ATL
NRT-MSP
MSP-NRT
LAX-SYD
I don't doubt ATL 777 might move out completely, but couldn't the size of ATL 777 and DTW 777 be flipped vs closing ATL 777?
I ask, because what else would do a route like ATL-NRT?
FWIW 777 routes (by my best count, I might be missing some):
ATL-DTW
ATL-LAX
ATL-DXB
ATL-JNB
ATL-NRT
DTW-ICN
DTW-PVG
DTW-PEK
DTW-HKG
NRT-HKG
NRT-SIN
NRT-TPE
NRT-ATL
NRT-MSP
MSP-NRT
LAX-SYD
I too find it hard to fathom them closing the 777 base in ATL, but I am not the one that started the discussion. I heard what Scambo heard, and from different people. It is more about diversifying our flying and moving things out of the ATL basket from what I was told. It has to do with the way the City of Atlanta played with the renegotiation of our leases, or so the story goes.
From what I could gather, and I did not ask too many questions, it was not going to be immediate. For that reason alone, I bet ti never happens. From what I hear there will be more seats pulled on the next bid. The 777 is doing MSP-NRT and similar markets. Its not that they are parking anything, they are just moving stuff around to maximize its benefit.
As for DTW and LAX from ATL on the 777, those are position flights. Once they get most of the MTC up and running in DTW on the 777, those two flights may not be needed.
The back end of that rumor was more interesting to me anyway. Go search what Scambo posted. That is the part that got me to respond, not that it was leaving ATL, it was what the long term plans were. (Long meaning five years)
I also took this as a purposeful leak. One that is to get out to certain people or organizations, not pilots, but airlines and airport boards. Its a message.
NRT is going back tot he 744. That really leaves JND and DXB. DXB just went to a 24 hr layo.
I too find it hard to fathom them closing the 777 base in ATL, but I am not the one that started the discussion. I heard what Scambo heard, and from different people. It is more about diversifying our flying and moving things out of the ATL basket from what I was told. It has to do with the way the City of Atlanta played with the renegotiation of our leases, or so the story goes.
From what I could gather, and I did not ask too many questions, it was not going to be immediate. For that reason alone, I bet ti never happens. From what I hear there will be more seats pulled on the next bid. The 777 is doing MSP-NRT and similar markets. Its not that they are parking anything, they are just moving stuff around to maximize its benefit.
As for DTW and LAX from ATL on the 777, those are position flights. Once they get most of the MTC up and running in DTW on the 777, those two flights may not be needed.
The back end of that rumor was more interesting to me anyway. Go search what Scambo posted. That is the part that got me to respond, not that it was leaving ATL, it was what the long term plans were. (Long meaning five years)
I too find it hard to fathom them closing the 777 base in ATL, but I am not the one that started the discussion. I heard what Scambo heard, and from different people. It is more about diversifying our flying and moving things out of the ATL basket from what I was told. It has to do with the way the City of Atlanta played with the renegotiation of our leases, or so the story goes.
From what I could gather, and I did not ask too many questions, it was not going to be immediate. For that reason alone, I bet ti never happens. From what I hear there will be more seats pulled on the next bid. The 777 is doing MSP-NRT and similar markets. Its not that they are parking anything, they are just moving stuff around to maximize its benefit.
As for DTW and LAX from ATL on the 777, those are position flights. Once they get most of the MTC up and running in DTW on the 777, those two flights may not be needed.
The back end of that rumor was more interesting to me anyway. Go search what Scambo posted. That is the part that got me to respond, not that it was leaving ATL, it was what the long term plans were. (Long meaning five years)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: SLC ERB
Posts: 467
Thanks Bar.... I'll republish, it can't hurt. It took 12 years to finish my BS. I decided to stop going to college early on to pursue a full time flying job. I told myself that I'd start back 6 months later. WRONG!!! Finishing a degree working full time and with 2 kids screaming in my ear while trying to study was not easy. Glad it's finally done
Congrats on finally getting it done and good luck!
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,431
Correct! Only our Pacific Theater qual requires entry only.
What he may have been thinking of was when we flew redeyes from JFK-BOG.
Then, flight ops policies were even if the crew was qualified, that there would be a third pilot for the JFK-BOG leg only due to the terrain, challenging arrival, etc all after a 5 hour redeye (a good idea I might add). Then, for awhile there was a bit of an underhanded "grease my skids" where LCAs and AQFOs were the only ones getting this deal (thus the deviate from DH go right back to ATL on the morning BOG-ATL flight scenario).
But these were not quals at all--just flight ops policies. ALPA quickly said, "uh, this should be available for all pilots, not just Flight Standards guys" so a MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) was written up and these were actually put into the bid package.
Now we don't fly JFK-BOG all-nighters anyway so it is all a moot point.
But that was always a different animal from the inital BOG checkout which requires both an entry and exit from LCA/AQFO.
What he may have been thinking of was when we flew redeyes from JFK-BOG.
Then, flight ops policies were even if the crew was qualified, that there would be a third pilot for the JFK-BOG leg only due to the terrain, challenging arrival, etc all after a 5 hour redeye (a good idea I might add). Then, for awhile there was a bit of an underhanded "grease my skids" where LCAs and AQFOs were the only ones getting this deal (thus the deviate from DH go right back to ATL on the morning BOG-ATL flight scenario).
But these were not quals at all--just flight ops policies. ALPA quickly said, "uh, this should be available for all pilots, not just Flight Standards guys" so a MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) was written up and these were actually put into the bid package.
Now we don't fly JFK-BOG all-nighters anyway so it is all a moot point.
But that was always a different animal from the inital BOG checkout which requires both an entry and exit from LCA/AQFO.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
Prepare for incoming T. As a former North guy I miss standardization of SOPA/SMAC, but think the South's way of international (TOE) and SAQ is hands down better. NWA did very little international training. IE: Check out on the whale I had OE to Asia but none to Europe because the whale did not go there at that time. I get a charter there and the capt. is a known f'up and had I not studied up our international section, picked the brains of other capts that had flown the DC10, and had a S/O that had flown the C5 over there, we would have had to fill out at least a half dozen ASR's. Northwest just assumed that everyone or at least someone on the crew had been to these different theaters.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
I heard that Delta wants to pick up ORD to FCO from Alitalia and couple more cities after ORD CDG ends this spring, they want to use the vacant BJ gate, but the city of Chicago wants a "low cost" carrier in that gate.
Normally, someone predicts either:
1.) The price of oil shooting up,
2.) A stock market crash, or
3.) Both, as the reason for our impending cuts.
The thing that should give you comfort is that no pilot in the history of aviation has ever accurately predicted:
1.) What will happen with the stock market
2.) The future price of anything, or
3.) His or her company's intention to furlough.
I say you should just ignore all the talk of doom and gloom and assume that some are a little grumpy because their field goal kicker missed a kick, their presidential candidate underperformed in Iowa, or both, and carry on.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post