Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
12-26-2011, 07:12 AM
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Slow the last couple of days. Hope everyone had a good Christmas. 
12-26-2011, 07:13 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
12-26-2011, 07:15 AM
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Good Luck.
12-26-2011, 07:23 AM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Hey I thought there was no money in cargo? There is a brand new British Airways cargo 747-800 in the ATL.
Careful parking it in ATL, if its anything like marta and the mall someone might steal the catalytic converter or battery while it's parked here.
Careful parking it in ATL, if its anything like marta and the mall someone might steal the catalytic converter or battery while it's parked here.
12-26-2011, 07:27 AM
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
12-26-2011, 08:29 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Random thoughts ...
With the Continental/United merger wrapping up soon, do you think DAL we be at a disadvantage once their synergies realize? I ask because they have an impressive wide body fleet, and most of their hubs are located at airports with large O&D demand.
DAL only has ATL and NYC with large O&E. I don't consider LAX because it seems our company doesn't want to compete there ... or at least it is giving it away to Alaska. Our other hubs don't make it in the top ten of O&D
We chased SWA out of SLC but they went to DEN and have set up an impressive hub there. Why didn't our management see the potential in DEN like SWA did?
With the Continental/United merger wrapping up soon, do you think DAL we be at a disadvantage once their synergies realize? I ask because they have an impressive wide body fleet, and most of their hubs are located at airports with large O&D demand.
DAL only has ATL and NYC with large O&E. I don't consider LAX because it seems our company doesn't want to compete there ... or at least it is giving it away to Alaska. Our other hubs don't make it in the top ten of O&D
We chased SWA out of SLC but they went to DEN and have set up an impressive hub there. Why didn't our management see the potential in DEN like SWA did?
12-26-2011, 08:40 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,235
Random thoughts ...
With the Continental/United merger wrapping up soon, do you think DAL we be at a disadvantage once their synergies realize? I ask because they have an impressive wide body fleet, and most of their hubs are located at airports with large O&D demand.
DAL only has ATL and NYC with large O&E. I don't consider LAX because it seems our company doesn't want to compete there ... or at least it is giving it away to Alaska. Our other hubs don't make it in the top ten of O&D
We chased SWA out of SLC but they went to DEN and have set up an impressive hub there. Why didn't our management see the potential in DEN like SWA did?
With the Continental/United merger wrapping up soon, do you think DAL we be at a disadvantage once their synergies realize? I ask because they have an impressive wide body fleet, and most of their hubs are located at airports with large O&D demand.
DAL only has ATL and NYC with large O&E. I don't consider LAX because it seems our company doesn't want to compete there ... or at least it is giving it away to Alaska. Our other hubs don't make it in the top ten of O&D
We chased SWA out of SLC but they went to DEN and have set up an impressive hub there. Why didn't our management see the potential in DEN like SWA did?
Merry Christmas and Happy New Years to all!
12-26-2011, 08:42 AM
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Random thoughts ...
With the Continental/United merger wrapping up soon, do you think DAL we be at a disadvantage once their synergies realize? I ask because they have an impressive wide body fleet, and most of their hubs are located at airports with large O&D demand.
DAL only has ATL and NYC with large O&E. I don't consider LAX because it seems our company doesn't want to compete there ... or at least it is giving it away to Alaska. Our other hubs don't make it in the top ten of O&D
We chased SWA out of SLC but they went to DEN and have set up an impressive hub there. Why didn't our management see the potential in DEN like SWA did?
With the Continental/United merger wrapping up soon, do you think DAL we be at a disadvantage once their synergies realize? I ask because they have an impressive wide body fleet, and most of their hubs are located at airports with large O&D demand.
DAL only has ATL and NYC with large O&E. I don't consider LAX because it seems our company doesn't want to compete there ... or at least it is giving it away to Alaska. Our other hubs don't make it in the top ten of O&D
We chased SWA out of SLC but they went to DEN and have set up an impressive hub there. Why didn't our management see the potential in DEN like SWA did?
There is no doubt they will be a tough competitor. But I think they still have a long way to go on merging their labor groups. Until then, they won't be able to truly recognize all the synergies.
12-26-2011, 09:09 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
As someone previously said...the UCAL is already kicking our butt financially, without the merged groups.
12-26-2011, 09:16 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Finally getting rid of the ARMs
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
