Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2011, 06:47 PM
  #82291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Razorback flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Uncoveraged...
Posts: 277
Default

Also of note: From an R & I report from last spring, roughly 60% of pilots were remaining active to 62 and 63, and about 70% to 61. Its probably a pretty safe assumption that roughly 50% will remain active to 65.
Razorback flyer is offline  
Old 12-02-2011, 06:53 PM
  #82292  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
The measurement period metric and compliance proviso applies after we hit 49.5 or essentially 50-50. If that happens in any one of these three years leading up to March 2014, the lookback is gone and we start that window.
That is my understanding too. It is a monthly snapshot. Lets talk about what this MOU did:
  • Ailitalia was added
  • Martinair was taken out of the AF figures so they could transfer flying there to side step our labor agreement
  • Delta's baseline decreased from 51.7 to what must be at least 48.5% (50%-1.5%)
  • Each month a percentage is measured. That percentage stands on its own and is not averaged
  • 12 month breach language removed
  • "end of summer" breach language removed
  • 90 day cure language removed
  • three year breach language added
  • Over three years Delta's flying must be at least 48.5%.* If Delta breaches our agreement, Delta then has 12 months to become compliant. If during that 12 months, the monthly percentage is = or > 48.5% the measurement period beings anew.
  • earliest compliance could be required is 31 March 2015
If anyone understood the agreement they would be very upset. The language is sufficiently obtuse to confuse nearly everyone, including whomever might be called on to render a decision on a grievance.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
Made a simple phone call on the AF agreement. What was not noted here is that if the company falls out of compliance in a measurement period they have to come back into compliance in 12 months for the 3 year look back period. That means that if they allow Delta to fall even a small amount behind the 48.5 percent number they would have to have a massive increase in flying in the correction year to get back to the rolling 3 year average. It in effect makes its very difficult if not impossible for the company to fall below the average it needs. The routes picked up from AF this winter are to insure the company does not fall into that situation. A significant portion of the reductions to Europe are to allow for the lie flat seat mod on the 7ER fleet. There will be a issue again next winter as they complete the mod line for the aircraft. As we pick up the flying in the Spring AF will pick back up the ORD route. SEA may stick with us.
The word "average" appears no where in the document, or its definitions. It is written as a rolling three year time period with measurements calculated on monthly percentages. One month's compliance resets the window.

I thought through a number of scenarios to unscrew this ... couldn't come up with anything that would have a positive result other than supporting our MEC.

* No comment is made in the source document about the calculation of the percentage flying. In a public interview XX told the pilots that the calculations were made on a month by month basis and that those figures were NOT carried forward as an average, or aggregate.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-02-2011 at 07:57 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 12-02-2011, 07:48 PM
  #82293  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
That sucks! Is there any sort of coverage on it?



In my attempts to "need" to replace my 2007 lappy, I've spilled drinks (adult and family) on it before, sent it down escalators in the airport, and dribbled goodness knows how many crumbs onto it. Stupid thing still keeps trucking.

Check out all these awesome features:

My dad worked for IBM so I got his old laptop when I went to college.



Only weighed 30 lbs and had a whopping 256k RAM (No Hard Drive). The dot matrix printer killed.
Jesse is offline  
Old 12-02-2011, 08:06 PM
  #82294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Then there is PWA 1.P.4 Note Two
If the company reaches 49.75% for a 12 month period, all previous capacity share percentages will be disregarded and a new three year measurement period begins.

If we fly 40%, 40%, 49.75% our average will be 43.25 but because of Note Two, Delta is off the hook because it met the 49.75% for the last rolling 12-month period.
One year of nearly 50% flying wipes out all accrued flying-deficit from previous years.
Wow. Is there any floor for the two down years then? Can they go zero, zero, 49.75%? What is our lower limit, and YTF does one single year of still below 50% fix 2 years of unlimited downside? Who would ever agree to something as asinine as that? Is that really what this new unilaterally ramrodded MOU allows?

Its not that I have a stedfast faith in ALPA or whatever, but I have a hard time imagining anyone would agree to something as insane as that. Is this really what we just did to ourselves?

If this is true, we need to watch out for a similar POS for Pacific JV's and even South America JV's. I can just see it now...we rotate to grab 49.75% of one theatre every 3 years as we gut the other two for two years. Someone please tell me this is not how it is (and please show your work so a simple guy can understand it).
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-02-2011, 08:11 PM
  #82295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Wouldn't that be great! Unfortunately it's more like 15 figure unfunded entitlement obligations. 12 figures is only 100 billion.

Carl
My bad. Forgot to take my shoes off and got cocky.
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-02-2011, 08:20 PM
  #82296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Starboard Side, weekends & holidays.
Posts: 856
Default

Originally Posted by Jesse
My dad worked for IBM so I got his old laptop when I went to college.



Only weighed 30 lbs and had a whopping 256k RAM (No Hard Drive). The dot matrix printer killed.
I briefly dated a girl in college who actually had one of those.... in 1995. I think it may have been a newer model. The screen popped up and rotated out, and I know it had a hard drive because there was this strangely addictive game involving gorillas and throwing bananas that shaved at least 0.3 off my GPA.
FmrFreightDog is offline  
Old 12-02-2011, 08:26 PM
  #82297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 432
Default

A little random, but I love the targeted advertising on here. The current ad for me says "fly Delta to Minneapolis" haha! I think they need to work on figuring out their audience a little better.

(PS I just flew into Minneapolis on a different airline )
Brocc15 is offline  
Old 12-02-2011, 08:37 PM
  #82298  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by FmrFreightDog
I briefly dated a girl in college who actually had one of those.... in 1995. I think it may have been a newer model. The screen popped up and rotated out, and I know it had a hard drive because there was this strangely addictive game involving gorillas and throwing bananas that shaved at least 0.3 off my GPA.
I had mine in '86. Graphics?! Don't ever remember seeing graphics on black and amber 9" screen. The original IBM PC had a game (I think it came with the computer) called Zork; all text based, no graphics. If I showed that to my kids they'd probably end up shooting milk out of there noses from laughing so hard at the lameness. I wish my dad had put the money he used to buy those PCs into Apple stock instead.
Jesse is offline  
Old 12-03-2011, 03:52 AM
  #82299  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
My wife is working on me to want to have them... she wanted one yesterday. I suppose next year will be the year I start trying to send one past the goalie.....

Practice makes perfect. Practice, practice, practice.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 12-03-2011, 04:01 AM
  #82300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
The measurement period metric and compliance proviso applies after we hit 49.5 or essentially 50-50. If that happens in any one of these three years leading up to March 2014, the lookback is gone and we start that window.

You need to call the office and have them explain how it works. Its a very complex agreement but what your post is still not correct. This was hashed out on the Dalpa forum a while back but the thread has dropped off and I can't copy it. What your posting was brought up and explained. They can't go to zero zero and then 49.5 percent and all is well.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices