Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
3.5% unemployment in ND.
13.4% in MI.
10.2% in GA.
13.4% in NV.
Review & Outlook: The Non-Green Jobs Boom - WSJ.com
And Ohio I thought was poised to join ND...
13.4% in MI.
10.2% in GA.
13.4% in NV.
Review & Outlook: The Non-Green Jobs Boom - WSJ.com
And Ohio I thought was poised to join ND...
![Dakota Kid is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was talking to a friend who is an MD-11 Captain at FedEx and goes to my church.
He mentioned that they're madly in love with the 777, obviously since they're ordering 60. It is allowing them... please take this as second hand info nothing more... but it is allowing them to leave Asia 2 or 3 hours later than UPS because it can fly nonstop back to MEM while other cargo aircraft will make the stop in ANC.
In a business day the 2 or 3 hours later is tremendously popular.
But 60 777s. We got combined 34 or 33 super premium widebodies in our 777 and 744 fleet. They're double that. And if you throw in the 64 MD11s they're 4X larger. There is absolutely no money in freight.
He mentioned that they're madly in love with the 777, obviously since they're ordering 60. It is allowing them... please take this as second hand info nothing more... but it is allowing them to leave Asia 2 or 3 hours later than UPS because it can fly nonstop back to MEM while other cargo aircraft will make the stop in ANC.
In a business day the 2 or 3 hours later is tremendously popular.
But 60 777s. We got combined 34 or 33 super premium widebodies in our 777 and 744 fleet. They're double that. And if you throw in the 64 MD11s they're 4X larger. There is absolutely no money in freight.
While I agree that there is money in freight, a valid comparison between Delta and FedEX/UPS consists of the fact that we move similar metal back and forth safely. Fed Ex and UPS make their money in overnight small packages, and have mostly the corner on that market--with the associated infrastructure--a huge infrastructure. While they are getting into the bulk freight business at an increasing rate, their bread and butter is essentially an overnight mail service. We can't do that without enormous capital outlay.
Now if we are talking dedicated freighters and belly freight, yeah, I'll buy that argument--although there are a lot of dedicated freight haulers out there.
![brakechatter is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Carl Spackler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Carl Spackler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was talking to a friend who is an MD-11 Captain at FedEx and goes to my church.
He mentioned that they're madly in love with the 777, obviously since they're ordering 60. It is allowing them... please take this as second hand info nothing more... but it is allowing them to leave Asia 2 or 3 hours later than UPS because it can fly nonstop back to MEM while other cargo aircraft will make the stop in ANC.
In a business day the 2 or 3 hours later is tremendously popular.
But 60 777s. We got combined 34 or 33 super premium widebodies in our 777 and 744 fleet. They're double that. And if you throw in the 64 MD11s they're 4X larger. There is absolutely no money in freight.
He mentioned that they're madly in love with the 777, obviously since they're ordering 60. It is allowing them... please take this as second hand info nothing more... but it is allowing them to leave Asia 2 or 3 hours later than UPS because it can fly nonstop back to MEM while other cargo aircraft will make the stop in ANC.
In a business day the 2 or 3 hours later is tremendously popular.
But 60 777s. We got combined 34 or 33 super premium widebodies in our 777 and 744 fleet. They're double that. And if you throw in the 64 MD11s they're 4X larger. There is absolutely no money in freight.
I had this happen with my ipad. It went Fedex to MEM and was at my door step at 430 that afternoon. Same day it left China. No kidding.
![acl65pilot is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oops... from AVHerald Accident: LOT B763 at Warsaw on Nov 1st 2011, forced gear up landing
Accident: LOT B763 at Warsaw on Nov 1st 2011, forced gear up landing
By Simon Hradecky, created Thursday, Dec 1st 2011 11:44Z, last updated Thursday, Dec 1st 2011 11:54Z
The Polish Panstwowa Komisja Badania Wypadkow Lotniczych (Polish State Commission for Aircraft Accident Investigation, PKBWL) released their preliminary report reporting that the aircraft suffered a hydraulic leak shortly after takeoff from Newark's runway 04L, when the gear and flaps were retracted. The center hydraulic system's (System "C") pressure dropped as a result. Just after the flaps had fully retracted the crew received a low pressure message on the Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS), the hydraulic quantity indication reduced from 105.1% to 10.6% in 2 minutes, the aircraft was climbing through 3850 feet MSL at that point. The crew actioned the relevant checklists and consulted with the airline's operations center resulting in the decision to continue the flight.
While on approach to Warsaw the crew performed the alternate gear extension procedure however the gear did not extend. While in a holding military aircraft were dispatched to visually check the aircraft and reported the gear was still in the up position. The crew attempted another gravity extension which still did not extend the gear.
About 72 minutes after aborting the first approach to Warsaw, in view of the failed attempts to lower the gear and the fuel reserves depleting the crew decided to commence a belly landing. After the aircraft came to a stop an evacuation commenced through all doors except for the right hand overwing exits, the evacuation was completed in about 90 seconds.
About 15-20 minutes after the end of the evacuation the first members of PKBWL arrived at the scene and found the "C829 BAT BUS DISTR" circuit breaker on the P6 panel was in the popped position, the "C4248 LANDING GEAR - ALTN EXT MOTOR" circuit breaker was in the closed position. The recordings of cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder were secured.
Circuit breaker C829 protects a number of systems including the alternate landing gear extension system. It's position was not recorded or indicated by any aircraft system.
After the aircraft was lifted off the runway, the circuit breaker C829 was closed, then the alternate landing gear extension was activated and successfully extended the landing gear, so that the aircraft could be towed to the airline's maintenance hangar.
On Nov 2nd the location of the hydraulic leak was identified in a damaged hose belonging to the center hydraulic system. The hose was disassembled and sent to the NTSB for further analysis.
The captain held an ATPL and accumulated 15,980 hours total flying time (thereof 14,007 hours in command) and 13,307 hours on type. The first officer (ATPL) accumulated 9,431 hours total flying time, thereof 1,981 hours on type.
The open circuit breaker (Photo: PKBWL):
![](http://avherald.com/img/lot_b763_sp-lpc_warsaw_111101_3.jpg)
The damaged hydraulic hose (Photo: PKBWL):
Accident: LOT B763 at Warsaw on Nov 1st 2011, forced gear up landing
By Simon Hradecky, created Thursday, Dec 1st 2011 11:44Z, last updated Thursday, Dec 1st 2011 11:54Z
The Polish Panstwowa Komisja Badania Wypadkow Lotniczych (Polish State Commission for Aircraft Accident Investigation, PKBWL) released their preliminary report reporting that the aircraft suffered a hydraulic leak shortly after takeoff from Newark's runway 04L, when the gear and flaps were retracted. The center hydraulic system's (System "C") pressure dropped as a result. Just after the flaps had fully retracted the crew received a low pressure message on the Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS), the hydraulic quantity indication reduced from 105.1% to 10.6% in 2 minutes, the aircraft was climbing through 3850 feet MSL at that point. The crew actioned the relevant checklists and consulted with the airline's operations center resulting in the decision to continue the flight.
While on approach to Warsaw the crew performed the alternate gear extension procedure however the gear did not extend. While in a holding military aircraft were dispatched to visually check the aircraft and reported the gear was still in the up position. The crew attempted another gravity extension which still did not extend the gear.
About 72 minutes after aborting the first approach to Warsaw, in view of the failed attempts to lower the gear and the fuel reserves depleting the crew decided to commence a belly landing. After the aircraft came to a stop an evacuation commenced through all doors except for the right hand overwing exits, the evacuation was completed in about 90 seconds.
About 15-20 minutes after the end of the evacuation the first members of PKBWL arrived at the scene and found the "C829 BAT BUS DISTR" circuit breaker on the P6 panel was in the popped position, the "C4248 LANDING GEAR - ALTN EXT MOTOR" circuit breaker was in the closed position. The recordings of cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder were secured.
Circuit breaker C829 protects a number of systems including the alternate landing gear extension system. It's position was not recorded or indicated by any aircraft system.
After the aircraft was lifted off the runway, the circuit breaker C829 was closed, then the alternate landing gear extension was activated and successfully extended the landing gear, so that the aircraft could be towed to the airline's maintenance hangar.
On Nov 2nd the location of the hydraulic leak was identified in a damaged hose belonging to the center hydraulic system. The hose was disassembled and sent to the NTSB for further analysis.
The captain held an ATPL and accumulated 15,980 hours total flying time (thereof 14,007 hours in command) and 13,307 hours on type. The first officer (ATPL) accumulated 9,431 hours total flying time, thereof 1,981 hours on type.
The open circuit breaker (Photo: PKBWL):
![](http://avherald.com/img/lot_b763_sp-lpc_warsaw_111101_3.jpg)
The damaged hydraulic hose (Photo: PKBWL):
![](http://avherald.com/img/lot_b763_sp-lpc_warsaw_111101_4.jpg)
![iaflyer is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Never mind..........
Last edited by johnso29; 12-01-2011 at 08:20 AM.
![johnso29 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dumb question, but does the checklist include a step checking the circuit breaker?
![Pancake is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![iaflyer is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Something that the QRH should direct pilots to ... check the CB panels. We've had several events here and there where checking the panel, calling maintenance, resetting if appropriate, then writing up, would have saved a lot of time and forehead slapping after the fact.
My most amusing mechanical malady in commercial service was at a regional airline. As I greeted passengers aboard a lady pointed at the flight deck and said "is your airplane on fire?" ... "Why, yes it is. Lets go back up to the terminal ..." (The silly Brazillians put the Generator Control Units beside the First Officer's seat. The phenolic block which held the induction coil for the Ammeter melted and made lots of smoke, but no real harm at the gate.)
My most amusing mechanical malady in commercial service was at a regional airline. As I greeted passengers aboard a lady pointed at the flight deck and said "is your airplane on fire?" ... "Why, yes it is. Lets go back up to the terminal ..." (The silly Brazillians put the Generator Control Units beside the First Officer's seat. The phenolic block which held the induction coil for the Ammeter melted and made lots of smoke, but no real harm at the gate.)
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-01-2011 at 07:47 AM.
![Bucking Bar is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post