capncrunch

Ahhh the fear card. Check.

shiznit

The length of PG's timetable may be a little long.

The idea that disrupting the entire negotiations process for an extended period of time in the middle of a critical Sect. 6 is correct.

If it doesn't worry you, that is a problem.
If you are not concerned about USAPA, SWAPA, APA, etc. problems with the Seham Law firm, that is a problem too.

iceman49

No capital was wasted on the hat issue, pilots just stopped wearing them and the company finally came to grips with the reality. Not sure about the jackets, I think it was along the same lines.

80ktsClamp

As someone on the outside during that time period.... ya'll looked ridiculous wearing those leather jackets. Those things look very unprofessional.

I think the hat should be optional in the summer uniform, though.

FmrFreightDog

As someone on the inside during that time period, I agree completely. Then again, I still think I look like a d-bag in the double-breasted jacket. Guess I just can't win.

LeineLodge

I couldn't agree more. That is that I look like a d-bag, not you.

The jacket only looks good on a very tall, very thin pilot WITH the hat. It looks completely ridiculous without the hat and guys that I see wearing it without the hat AND unbuttoned completely take the cake.

Of course if they start paying us properly on C2012 I'll wear an "Angry Birds" uniform if they want me to. My pride is cheap, well SWA+ cheap at least.

NuGuy

No need. It was Colonel Mustard, with the lead pipe, in the study....

Nu

Pineapple Guy

Are you sure my timing is off? Here's how I came up with a two year delay:

1) Six months for the NMB to call for an election and the results to be determined.
2) Assuming DPA wins, six more months for DPA to conduct fair and balanced elections to fill the slate of local and national officers, as well as staff all the committees
3) Once the officers are in, it will take another six months to develop and then survey the pilot group and figure out what they want, based on the DPA survey
4) Once those results are known, another six months to craft an opener.

Frankly, I think those are best case times - so two years is probably optimistic. Meanwhile, the rest of us tread water and watch the world go by living under "status quo" conditions.

No thanks.

hoserpilot

I agree, Carl is a target....a big target on this board. I've sent my card in. I read the DPA emails. I've scoured the site. I've talked about DPA with my captains. I was at the 44 meeting today. I was at the Alpa roadshow in PTC. I'm informed and I'm trying to get ALL the facts. Carl has posted a lot of facts but so have the Alpa supporters. We can't ignore that. It just gets so old to get on this site and see 10 posts in a row by Carl where he insults people. Here are some quotes;

If you really were a rep for 6 years, you truly must have been an awful one.

And I thought you were a serious person. You're just another ALPA apologist

Or people who need to lie about what's actually in the SWAPA contract...eh Pineapple Guy? (calling someone a liar)

what you've stated above because it shows such an amazing lack comprehension.

Your problem is that you see yourself as part of that big honey pot someday where you get max pay while staying home with your family every night on flight pay loss. (I know this guy....this is not his goal)

Wow! You are truly Kool-Aid infused

Y-Zass! (this was funny, I actually laughed out loud, thanks for making me spill my popcorn!!)

, but I also know it's your job to lie for the MEC...while on full flight pay loss. (do you really know Alfa's union position? I don't)



These were just from the last couple of days. I'm happy that Carl is pointing out facts and problems with Alpa. I'm also glad that Alpa supporters are digging into DPA. Sifting through the mudslinging rhetoric just gets so dog gone old. The above quotes distort his message.....in my opinion.

Dal88, I think people are finally wising up to your message. I'll bet many surveys will be supportive of restoration.

Carl, keep on doing what your doing but seriously, try to avoid the stuff above. The in-house union drive at my old carrier really did die a quick death from just one person. He was seen as a forum rabble rowser. The guy penned a letter and emailed it to the masses. Union drive supporters, like myself, crapped our pants when we saw this. We tried to have him tone down his internet rhetoric. He did but then sent out "the letter." Non-union supporters picked up on this and ran to the goal line. Carl, I know it sucks but you really do have to cater to people with softer feelings. (now I sound like a wheenie!! I'm not, really) The competition will use anything and everything they can to discredit you. Likewise, I would expect the same from DPA to discredit Alpa.

Hoserpilot...eh

DAL73n

The big thing to remember on this is no medical qualifying for the Delta Life Insurance. If you can qualify for cheaper term then by all means go ahead. Most people don't have enough life insurance (especially if you have a stay at home mom and want to provide enough money for the kids to go to school). A simple easy way to look at it is you knew you were going to die tomorrow how much life insurance would you get? While life insurance is a tough buy it is a critical part of any financial plan.