Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2011, 11:18 AM
  #79111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Good explanation, and as George pointed out, cash on hand allows they to go after possible opportunities when they present themselves.

You talk about AMR, and imo, if they enter CH11, the result will be a industry changer.
Understatement of the month.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 11:23 AM
  #79112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Good explanation, and as George pointed out, cash on hand allows they to go after possible opportunities when they present themselves.

You talk about AMR, and imo, if they enter CH11, the result will be a industry changer.
ACL you are the master of the nebulous non-statement... of course I mean that in a good way
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 11:24 AM
  #79113  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Understatement of the month.
It was meant to be an understatement. I personally do not see them leaving CH11 as an intact carrier.

One airline will be parted out. LCC or AMR, it depends on if AMR avoids CH11, or not.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 11:32 AM
  #79114  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
If you had $200,000 in the bank and a $200,000 mortgage, your net debt is zero. You could take the money out of the bank and pay off your mortgage and your net worth would not have changed. You could then take another mortgage on your house and get $200,000 cash and your net worth still hasn't changed.

Delta needs to have cash on hand to deal with day to day operations and they also have reserve cash to deal with unforeseen events. They also have cash on hand to be able to take advantage of any investment opportunities that are available or will be available.

Right now they have about $3.3 billion in real cash and another $1.8 in a revolver (like a revolving home equity loan, except a lot bigger) that they can draw on whenever they like. In order to report net debt, they subtract the $3.3 billion from their real debt number to deal with the fact that, theoretically, they could take all that cash and use it to reduce debt.

That is why "cash on hand" is often reported, but it is a next to useless statistic most of the time. In a case like American, sitting on the doorstep of the bankruptcy court, the cash can make all the difference in the world. Delta right now is producing a lot of free cash flow and they look to continue to produce that cash flow well into the future, so their cash on hand is lower, percentage-wise, than many other carriers. Delta could borrow more money and increase their cash on hand but that wouldn't affect their financial condition one iota other than to increase interest payments. Delta's focus on reducing debt is reducing their monthly interest payments which increases profits. That is smart in my opinion.
Alfa that's a well written explanation of an accounting practice. It's too bad that you didn't write accounting textbooks because Ferd and I would've gotten better grades.

But they wouldn't have let you write them anyways because if you make it too good kids pass and there is never a need for another expensive updated edition.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 11:39 AM
  #79115  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
I agree...very difficult...but doable, given the right team.

Furthermore, since we will have given the co. at least a bil/year for 8 years, by 01jan13, it is time for said co. to reciprocate.

Btw, we have DPA because our bargaining agent can't seem to say the restoration word in public. We would not have 25% of the group fractured, if DALPA would make it clear at every opportunity, that we will be seeking significant improvements in all areas of the CBA, period!

Unfortunately, I sincerely believe you will not see any statements from our current group, that are even remotely close to this. I hope I am proven wrong.
Well, when you're dealing with politicians you have to be very careful how you interpret what they say. I believe it was the most recent "Chairman's Letter" where he talked about "significant improvements" for C2012. That sounds great on the surface, and it's better than not advocating anything positive. But you also have to remember that this same MEC administration has consistently referred to the gains we achieved in the merger as "significant." Since those gains were essentially a COLA to our bankruptcy/emergency rates (with a little Delta stock thrown in to give a very small boost to our retirement accounts), I'm not so sure that TO's definition of "significant" is the same as mine or yours. In fact, it appears that it clearly is not.

So I think, while they are starting to provide a little window dressing here and there (maybe partly because of the pressure from DPA?), we are probably still stuck with the same old falling apart house, badly in need of major repairs, and no real plan or even intention to fix the major problems.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 11:50 AM
  #79116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fisherpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 405
Default

After reading the post on staffing I'm assuming they will not not need to hire for 2012 staffing unless early retirements pick up. Is this true? I have read on here that hiring for the following year (busy time = Summer) is always in the fall.
fisherpilot is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 12:13 PM
  #79117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
If you had $200,000 in the bank and a $200,000 mortgage, your net debt is zero. You could take the money out of the bank and pay off your mortgage and your net worth would not have changed. You could then take another mortgage on your house and get $200,000 cash and your net worth still hasn't changed.

Delta needs to have cash on hand to deal with day to day operations and they also have reserve cash to deal with unforeseen events. They also have cash on hand to be able to take advantage of any investment opportunities that are available or will be available.

Right now they have about $3.3 billion in real cash and another $1.8 in a revolver (like a revolving home equity loan, except a lot bigger) that they can draw on whenever they like. In order to report net debt, they subtract the $3.3 billion from their real debt number to deal with the fact that, theoretically, they could take all that cash and use it to reduce debt.

That is why "cash on hand" is often reported, but it is a next to useless statistic most of the time. In a case like American, sitting on the doorstep of the bankruptcy court, the cash can make all the difference in the world. Delta right now is producing a lot of free cash flow and they look to continue to produce that cash flow well into the future, so their cash on hand is lower, percentage-wise, than many other carriers. Delta could borrow more money and increase their cash on hand but that wouldn't affect their financial condition one iota other than to increase interest payments. Delta's focus on reducing debt is reducing their monthly interest payments which increases profits. That is smart in my opinion.

Thanks Alfa, great explanation and that was my first impression. Nothing tangible just shifting columns on a spreadsheet...

But I am wondering about the underlying reasons for the accounting change. And the industry speculation seems to revolve around some type of future investment...


Cheers
George
georgetg is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 01:54 PM
  #79118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by fisherpilot
After reading the post on staffing I'm assuming they will not not need to hire for 2012 staffing unless early retirements pick up. Is this true? I have read on here that hiring for the following year (busy time = Summer) is always in the fall.
The word I got re: hiring was don't expect anything in 2012, take it with a grain of salt!
sinca3 is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 02:56 PM
  #79119  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
The word I got re: hiring was don't expect anything in 2012, take it with a grain of salt!
So if we say we're hiring we don't but if we say we aren't does that mean hiring 900?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-31-2011, 03:06 PM
  #79120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fisherpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 405
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So if we say we're hiring we don't but if we say we aren't does that mean hiring 900?
900 sounds good to me! Although 2013 works out better for me financially! Come on Georgia Pre-K! It would be awesome to slip through the cracks and get in on the first round of hiring
fisherpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices