Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2011, 04:36 PM
  #78441  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
Is 9700 Euro/month the monthly take-home pay for an A380 captain? That doesn't seem like very much. I would hope we don't rely too much on the AF/KLM numbers.
It works out to be about 330,000 per year. I wouldn't mind relying on that as an accurate comparable to use as a floor for our contract. If we had a real union as opposed to a communication's arm for management, they'd want that too.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 04:41 PM
  #78442  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Good point. At least TO is stepping up and doing something.
Yes he is. He's blocking and ignoring the lawful flight pay loss resolution passed by my LEC.

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Those who can or will...DO.

Those who can't (or in our case, won't)...get on forums and complain.
Translation: Shut up and do what you're told. Exactly what a bottom-up organization should be...right Herkflyr?

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 04:51 PM
  #78443  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
I DO have a problem with the card drive, especially as we enter section 6.

Every little thing that management gives in negotiations "raises the floor." If management is not sure who has authority to negotiate with them as our bargaining agent, management will sit tight until the uncertainty is resolved. There is no point in negotiating with the wrong party.

The way I see it, every card undermines the guy at the table bargaining on our behalf.

If the DPA wins the election, then I'll support the DPA (which will be supporting our pilots). However, at this point a representational battle just stalls, and harms, contract 2012.

Your post is right on the money ... participate in your LEC election.
Elect guys who you support (and who support you).

JUST MY OPINION
Voting in the DPA prior to our Section 6 opener is absolutely critical for us to have any chance at restoration. Our OWN UNION is trying desperately to keep critical information from us in the hopes of producing a contract survey that allow them their desire to aim really low. If that doesn't work, they'll simply never release the survey results. Then the MEC will create the opener THEY want to give to management. At that point, we're done. Even if we vote in the DPA at that point, we'll never do better than the opener given to management at the start of Section 6.

The evidence is all around us that we are being "mushroomed". We are now being explicitly told that we will "of course" not see the survey results or the opener...even though we ALWAYS saw the opener on the North side. The excuse is some idiotic analogy to playing poker.

Glad you're happy with this, but I'm not. If we don't change this course, we lose.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 04:57 PM
  #78444  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Well, if you can do the math to come up with a CASM (cost per available seat mile) comparison, and IF we come out much 'cheaper' than they, and IF you can attribute all of the difference in CASM to Pilot Pay, then you might have an argument for an increase to match them, worth exploiting.

The company will come back with something along the lines of, "But it's much more expensive to live in Paris than in PTC, so they have to pay them more, and they have to pay 50% income tax, and their gubmint pays their health care..." etc.

So, to my way of thinking, it's still apples and oranges.

But in your way of thinking, what argument would you make to the company with this information?
Easy. You say: "Our JV partner (Air France) has this, and our largest competitor (Southwest) has this. We want this as well. You want to call the NMB or shall I?"

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 05:03 PM
  #78445  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
How do you then justify no term limit for the DPA reps that they are proposing?
Term limits should be self enforced in my opinion. Rather than being forced out of office by an official term limit, I always enjoy the contortions of the candidate excusing why his/her performance is so good that he/she just KNOWS that their constituents wants them to continue. That person gets my NO vote everytime.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 05:11 PM
  #78446  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

There is a new Chairman's letter out. Here is just a small excerpt.

"....But let’s be clear. It will soon be time for Delta to make a healthy investment in its pilots in the form of significant PWA improvements...."


Sounds good to me. BRING ON THE SIGNIFICANT PWA IMPROVEMENTS!!!!!!
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 05:21 PM
  #78447  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by hoserpilot
There is a new Chairman's letter out. Here is just a small excerpt.

"....But let’s be clear. It will soon be time for Delta to make a healthy investment in its pilots in the form of significant PWA improvements...."


Sounds good to me. BRING ON THE SIGNIFICANT PWA IMPROVEMENTS!!!!!!
I agree that sounded good and was more in line with what I want to hear from TO. However, I'm reminded of Bill Clinton's "definition of is." I'd like for TO to elaborate a little more on his idea of "significant." I've heard the COLA we obtained to our bankruptcy/emergency rates described as "significant." I hope we're not talking that kind of "significant."
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 05:32 PM
  #78448  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I agree that sounded good and was more in line with what I want to hear from TO. However, I'm reminded of Bill Clinton's "definition of is." I'd like for TO to elaborate a little more on his idea of "significant." I've heard the COLA we obtained to our bankruptcy/emergency rates described as "significant." I hope we're not talking that kind of "significant."
I think our definition of significant would allow you to commute to ATL in your brand new Malibu.....the plane, not the car!!! Ahh screw it, just pick your favorite DC-9 after MEM closes as your commuter plane. Btw, are you bidding back to the 88 again?
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 06:04 PM
  #78449  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

You guys are missing the "between the lines". The mention of potential consolidation in the last paragraph is no accident. In fact it makes me think moves are already afoot to acq either AK or both AK and Hawaiian.

W slot swap done and in hand... The western front is next.

I say NO interim mergers. Agreements. Pwa's of ANY kind, until C12 is in the bag. I have moved backwards since this merger as have ALL of my W2's and I'm sick of it.
Professor is offline  
Old 10-20-2011, 06:13 PM
  #78450  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Typing on iPhone so slow but I think wrt the 777 orders, if it was list price of $298M how many 744s could have been purchased? Because in one day you could have flown 269 people in one direction or 3,760 in 10 different directions or more importantly moved a lot of tonnage in cargo.

I was reading a old magazine the other day talking about the Beechcraft King Air and the article mentioned that "in keeping with traditional Beechcraft values the airplane had top notch flying qualities and interior fit and finish..." That made me wonder, what are our traditional values as an airline?

I think I know one, we buy wisely. The MD90 fleet is indicative of that value. The 739 by all indications was a steal.

We also manage the network wise(r).

But one value I don't want to lose is front line people. Are gate agents, pilots, FAs and rampers should be as wisely managed. Or we will suffer.
forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices