Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2011, 03:24 AM
  #77291  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
And let me guess, give up 100 seaters but oh, oh, oh, they will have "limits" like "only 88 seats" (100 seater with a first class the way management wants to fly them anyway) and can only do a certain percentage of the "hub to hub" or whatever.

Doesn't one of the regional outsourcing black holes come up for renewal in about 2 years? I think it was one of the smaller ones with SKYW but I'm not sure who its with. Agree to end that and reduce the outsourced "large RJ's" by the same amount. 25% on day 1, then 10% on 1 year after signing (to make up for the 5% we lost over the last year as well as covering the next year) plus 1% more B fund plus COLA to our per diem (retroactive to the last time it was increased) a massive vacation overhaul in our favor and enough line holder and reserve work rule changes to make 2 more years palatable, reigning in the AK code share abuses, future guarantees of DL pilot beneficial JV's if any more are sought, early openers again with accelerated mediation language and guaranteed COLA plus an initial 10-20% at the end of 2 years if we haven't reached an agreement, fix the use it or lose it sick pay system and I would consider such an extension (depending on every single other line of fine print in the entire contract, any one bad line of which could torpedo the entire thing).

That would be a net 37ish% in 366 days with partial scope recapture/strengthening at all 3 levels of our airline plus the necessary improvements required to press on in the interim.

Oh and 33% more underboob. That is a strike item.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 03:40 AM
  #77292  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Of course an ALPA apologist such as yourself would only post the most accurate of possible scenarios...right?

DPA is the only shot we have from being rolled by the national agenda of ALPA.
I finally found a post where Spackler told the truth about himself:

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
But then again, sometimes people simply have too much time and energy invested in war to be able to stop...even if they wanted to
slowplay is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 03:58 AM
  #77293  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 631
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Yeah, knowing about things like mergers where we wind up with 5.6% of the company and over 20% increase in direct compensation, or Joint Ventures where we get unprecedented production balance protections compared to the results of those non-NDA signing union guys...

I can see where you think those things are nonsense.

Sheesh....
5.6% of the company...Sheesh...I would have preferred DALPA restore our contract when we had that merger leverage...or at the very least establish a timetable with snapbacks tied to executive compensation!
LandGreen2 is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 04:01 AM
  #77294  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Yeah, knowing about things like mergers where we wind up with 5.6% of the company and over 20% increase in direct compensation, or Joint Ventures where we get unprecedented production balance protections compared to the results of those non-NDA signing union guys...

I can see where you think those things are nonsense.

Sheesh....

Slow;

Seems to me that 5.6% of the company cost us about 3-4 times the market cap of the company at bankruptcy exit. What a deal! Why doesnt ALPA recommend that the pilots buy Comair for a couple billion too.

You spin your way, I'll spin my way.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 05:03 AM
  #77295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
It's not an alternate universe ace. It's exactly how things were back when ALPA behaved like a union instead of the communications arm of management.

I personally told one of our managers that we all know negotiations is just sanctioned lying. Why would I need to sign an NDA to hear your lies when I know you'll just tell me without an NDA? At least without your NDA, I can tell my members about your lies. He just laughed, and I smiled back.

NDA's do nothing but separate union leaders from their members. Which is precisely what management wants.

Carl
This is populist drivel. On a very superficial level I can understand the appeal of the negative view of NDA's, especially if you completely distrust everything ALPA does as well as the people who volunteer, but as with most things the reality is far more in-depth, complex, and shades of gray.

I suggest you call your Reps, past or present, and they can give you numerous historical examples of where the NDA has given this pilot group advantages they would not have had otherwise. Being privy to corporate intel and plans ahead of the market and your competitors does not make you "in bed" with them. There are numerous times our interests align, just as there are numerous times they do not. Being opportunistic when they do to our collective advantage is bad how?

If you want to believe in grassy knolls behind every ALPA action there is no hope in a logical discussion.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 06:25 AM
  #77296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by LandGreen2
5.6% of the company...Sheesh...I would have preferred DALPA restore our contract when we had that merger leverage...or at the very least establish a timetable with snapbacks tied to executive compensation!
Land, that is thinking creatively and using leverage effectively. These DALPA folks don't think that way.

This brought to you by the same folks who brought us the negotiated end of 3b6.

What was it that they got for that? Something extremely valuable right??

We need professionals in there, Giant conflicts of interest are in play now.
TheManager is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 06:26 AM
  #77297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Dismayed
Posts: 1,598
Default

We interrupt this section 6 discussion with the following urgent message regarding the upcoming Red River Rivalry:



We now return to our regularly scheduled b!tching.
dragon is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 06:28 AM
  #77298  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by LandGreen2
5.6% of the company...Sheesh...I would have preferred DALPA restore our contract when we had that merger leverage...or at the very least establish a timetable with snapbacks tied to executive compensation!
I'll ask again. Have we seen any successful snapbacks? It's a honest question.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 06:46 AM
  #77299  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by dragon
we interrupt this section 6 discussion with the following urgent message regarding the upcoming red river rivalry:



we now return to our regularly scheduled b!tching.
Boomer Sooner!!!
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 10-04-2011, 06:56 AM
  #77300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Yeah, knowing about things like mergers where we wind up with 5.6% of the company and over 20% increase in direct compensation, or Joint Ventures where we get unprecedented production balance protections compared to the results of those non-NDA signing union guys...

I can see where you think those things are nonsense.

Sheesh....
Oh so all of that was because of NDA's? And who exactly disclosed that to you?

The pilot group(s) had a certain amount of leverage to go along with the merger. That is what resulted in the zero% pay increase (COLA is not a raise).

Now perhaps it would have come in handy to tell our benevolent secret keepers about the holes in the RAH agreement or how the company intended to abuse the daylights out of the AK code share. Those things would have been useful to know.
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices