Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2011, 06:14 AM
  #76761  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
I'm guessing that if both/either sides decide to go public with the negotiations, then that could be a sign that negotiations aren't going well. Kinda like what ucal is going through.

Someone mentioned it a few pages back, but if management doesn't like our position could they really just say we'll meet again in 6 months?
I've heard passing a TA with retro pay rarely ever happens, especially when contract negotiations are dragged out, but how long could management drag out negotiations if they wanted to before their hand is forced?
If the MEC approves anything for a vote I believe that resets the clock and negotiations start back at square one, sound about right? I realize there is a process cooling off period, arbitration...etc, but I just trying to figure out how long they could drag this thing out IF they wanted to.
Anybody know when the current NMB changes? Seems to me the current NMB & Delta management don't really get along. Perhaps this would be advantageous to us as a pilot group if management tried the game of walking away??
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:25 AM
  #76762  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
I'm guessing that if both/either sides decide to go public with the negotiations, then that could be a sign that negotiations aren't going well. Kinda like what ucal is going through.

Someone mentioned it a few pages back, but if management doesn't like our position could they really just say we'll meet again in 6 months?
I've heard passing a TA with retro pay rarely ever happens, especially when contract negotiations are dragged out, but how long could management drag out negotiations if they wanted to before their hand is forced?
If the MEC approves anything for a vote I believe that resets the clock and negotiations start back at square one, sound about right? I realize there is a process (cooling off period, arbitration...etc), but I just trying to figure out how long they could drag this thing out IF they wanted to.
My guess is that most likely there would not ever be "retro pay" and instead it is converted to a "signing bonus". Similar to what happened with Alaska Airlines. The reason for this is if it was "retro pay" the company would have to go back and pay anyone who left (i.e retired).
1234 is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:28 AM
  #76763  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 5-9 block, kill removing
Posts: 385
Default

Off topic.....any word on the upcoming AE? When? Category movements?
Raging white is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:32 AM
  #76764  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Raging white
Off topic.....any word on the upcoming AE? When? Category movements?
Around the end of October/beginning of Nov once the 2012 block hours are finalized. I imagine the final slot swap ruling will also have an effect on possible new categories. New categories are anybody's guess. I'm not sure even the company knows until the day before they announce it.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:34 AM
  #76765  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
I don't remember ever seeing any specific opener or any back and forth offers between the union and management. When there is a Tentative Agree ment (TA) the negotiating committees, it will be presented to the MEC for their vote and if they vote in favor there will be road shows to all the bases by the union to explain it. Then there will be a membership ratification vote. Probably closing about 2 months after a TA is reached.

Denny
I agree, and it can also be dangerous. If the company is presenting their openers, or subsequent positions publicly, they are in effect negotiating with the pilot group and not our bargaining agent. If that is to occur, I would immediately suspect that our NC is making demands that are far better than that of the position the company made public. Suffice to say, "Buyer be wary."
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:38 AM
  #76766  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nerd2009's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Delta M88 A ATL
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
I can agree with that fix! As you and others think, I think there should be some kind of con side paper or presentation.

Denny


The DPA should make the correct presentation, and hold open meetings during section 6 negotiations, open to all.

There is over 25% of DALPA pilots that are part of DPA, and this group of pilots has yet to flex its muscle.




nerd2009 is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:39 AM
  #76767  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
My guess is that most likely there would not ever be "retro pay" and instead it is converted to a "signing bonus". Similar to what happened with Alaska Airlines. The reason for this is if it was "retro pay" the company would have to go back and pay anyone who left (i.e retired).
There is nothing that states we should not do what we have done in the base.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:41 AM
  #76768  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
The DPA should make the correct presentation, and hold open meetings during section 6 negotiations, open to all.

There is over 25% of DALPA pilots that are part of DPA, and this group of pilots has yet to flex its muscle.




They should flex it if they can prior to openers being exchanged if they are going to do it at all. They should want to force those in office to take their position, or recall them. The fact that this group has not tried one recall to date really shows me that they suffer from apathy too.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:43 AM
  #76769  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
I'm guessing that if both/either sides decide to go public with the negotiations, then that could be a sign that negotiations aren't going well. Kinda like what ucal is going through.

Someone mentioned it a few pages back, but if management doesn't like our position could they really just say we'll meet again in 6 months?
I've heard passing a TA with retro pay rarely ever happens, especially when contract negotiations are dragged out, but how long could management drag out negotiations if they wanted to before their hand is forced?
If the MEC approves anything for a vote I believe that resets the clock and negotiations start back at square one, sound about right? I realize there is a process (cooling off period, arbitration...etc), but I just trying to figure out how long they could drag this thing out IF they wanted to.
First paragraph: That's probably an accurate assessment.

Second paragraph: The amendable date is Dec. 31, 2012. Contractually, if there is not an agreement by Mar. 31, 2013, both parties have agreed to petition the NMB jointly to get involved. From there the NMB wields the hammer. Just depends on who they are trying to bring inline. At AA they have been hammering the APA by essentially parking the negotiations. The NMB wields way too much power IMO.

Third paragraph: If there was a TA that was rejected by the membership I would think there would be a quick survey of the pilot group to see what the problem was and then they would try to fix those issues rather than starting from square one. This is what should happen but, I believe it was back in 1996, there was the threat of the negotiating committee resigning as well as the MEC and then having to start from before square one if we didn't vote for it. (My recollection of this might be off but not far)

The bottom line is that IF BOTH SIDES want to get this done, it could be done well before the amendable date but we know that won't be the case.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:49 AM
  #76770  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Off topic, but if you are miss a trip or numerous trips while using FMLA, do you get paid anything?

Thanks,
1234 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices