Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2011, 10:52 AM
  #76271  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Jabberwock
Elvis,

What you see is mostly a reaction to oil prices and the fact that manipulative traders like Goldman Sachs (who use our tax money to bet against us) are getting their butts handed to them.

Airlines are not a counter trend trade for the overall economy. Just oil.

The market is foolish. Republic's stock is up today while insiders are dumping like an ER FO on his first day home from a 9 day after a breakfast of raisin bran. That even with the fact that most of RJET's fuel is a pass through cost.
Jabber, I'm not considering it as an investment, I was simply highlighting the analyst's comment about airlines being "flush with cash" and on the rebound financially due to consolidation and capacity restraint. That tells me that the company complaining about financial woes during contract negotiations is simply a ploy to keep labor costs down.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 10:56 AM
  #76272  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
Jabber, I'm not considering it as an investment, I was simply highlighting the analyst's comment about airlines being "flush with cash" and on the rebound financially due to consolidation and capacity restraint. That tells me that the company complaining about financial woes during contract negotiations is simply a ploy to keep labor costs down.
You have (not you Elvis, but in general) to know that the DAL oil folks are putting in some hedges right now at these levels.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 10:58 AM
  #76273  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Don't tell my wife, but in regards to Pam, I did that.
You lie.

You liar.

I'll see you on the Maury Povich Show.

What? Y'all don't know me, y'all don't know me!
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:02 AM
  #76274  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Is it important to try to get extra insurance for retiring pilots prior to Medicare age? I think so. A lot of the geezers still flying don't want to pay cobra prices for them and their spouse. I say help them out until Medicare age, and then no more. It hopefully would increase geezers going out the door where they should be already, golfing in Flar-i-dah.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:03 AM
  #76275  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
You have (not you Elvis, but in general) to know that the DAL oil folks are putting in some hedges right now at these levels.
Absolutely -- it's a smart business plan.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:08 AM
  #76276  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Is it important to try to get extra insurance for retiring pilots prior to Medicare age? I think so. A lot of the geezers still flying don't want to pay cobra prices for them and their spouse. I say help them out until Medicare age, and then no more. It hopefully would increase geezers going out the door where they should be already, golfing in Flar-i-dah.

Just my opinion here, but isnt DAL big enough to self insure? Yes

Does DAL self insure? Yes

UHC administers DALs insurance program

Health insurance improvements are a no cost item which structured as they are put a price tag on the insurance. It is really no different that the fee for departure contracts outsourced to DCI. We bear the cost, but charge ourselves for the program to make the books prettier.

I repeat, no cost to change the system. However, an accountant could/would disagree.

There will be a short countdown after which I will be told how oh so wrong I am.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:11 AM
  #76277  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Just my opinion here, but isnt DAL big enough to self insure? Yes

Does DAL self insure? Yes

UHC administers DALs insurance program

Health insurance improvements are a no cost item which structured as they are put a price tag on the insurance. It is really no different that the fee for departure contracts outsourced to DCI. We bear the cost, but charge ourselves for the program to make the books prettier.

I repeat, no cost to change the system. However, an accountant could/would disagree.

There will be a short countdown after which I will be told how oh so wrong I am.
Why? Is your wife looking over your shoulder?

Last edited by johnso29; 09-23-2011 at 05:17 PM.
orvil is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:14 AM
  #76278  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Haven't gotten to the actual survey yet because I'm still shaking my head over this part of the email:


Note: Questions 28 and 29 concern pay rate increases and ask you to enter a number. You should answer each question with a two-digit number, e.g. express 5% as 05, 12% as 12, etc.



Don't you just love DALPA's template? The fact that they even talk about how to express a single digit pay rate increase is ridiculous enough. But what example do they use for a two digit pay rate increase?...12%! Not 50%, not 80%? What about how to input a three digit desire?


If you don't think DALPA has already decided what they hope we'll demand, you're kidding yourself. DALPA is in full expectations management mode to ensure they can show that their minimalistic desires are really what the pilots wanted too.




Carl
That is hella sad. Wow. I guess we can always compromise between 12, the high water mark, and 7, the constructive engagement target range, and end up with 9.5%....over the course of 5 years. Um, not! (Do people still say that? "Not!" after saying something they disagree with?)

Although I think you may be attacking ALPA unfairly on this one. I think they will gladly fight for 30, 50 or more percent raise, all the way up to 99% if that's what we want. You notice that you can't put in a triple digit number? There is a reason for that:

Whatever double digit percentage we put in we will get!!!!!!!!!! The catch is that same percentage will be the amount of current flying that we can further outsource. You know, cause airlines all the sudden can't buy planes anymore because of the debt, so we need to outsource them to fake airlines that take that debt with their only collateral being our long term iron clad co-signature on "their" loan.

So 99% raise means we get to keep 1% of our current flying. 30% raise means we only have to outsource 30 more percent of our flying, what a deal!
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:14 AM
  #76279  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The DPA is being silly. First of all, a large percentage (majority?) of Delta's outsourced small jet flying is not performed by ALPA members. Secondly, in addition to the cost of recovering flying (if there is any) there is a very real cost in breaking a long term contract. Third, we don't desire a reduction in the number of jets flying, we desire an increase in the flying performed by Delta pilots. Parking three RJ's which results in the parking of a 767 does not do anyone good. What we need is to get away from this "CRJ bad" "717 good" thinking when in reality they are both airplanes designed for the same market and should be flown by pilots on one mainline list.

The DPA is building on their false platform with a meaningless demand.

Jabberwock stated it perfectly.
You wouldn't understand Bar, because you're convinced there is no conflict of interest within ALPA. But for those with an actual pair of open eyes, this request of DPA actually serves a very clear purpose. This request will appear in thousands of surveys. When no such contract demand shows up in the opener, it will show everyone that DALPA could not put this in the opener because it couldn't withstand the process of consulting with our regional competitors. And it couldn't withstand the role ALPA's president plays in scrubbing our scope language.

This is of course only the case for those of us crippled by having an association with ALPA.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-23-2011, 11:14 AM
  #76280  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by orvil

Why? Is your wife looking over your shoulder?
Orvil, the mkt has a case of the fridays. I suspect it will close where it opened. I am eyeballin ERX as a buy and hold realizing it may go lower. Thats my fuel hedging plan. Thinkin 30.72-30.92 prior to the close.

I'm not posting this for anyone to take personal action or as a recommendation. DYODD.

If I buy, I'll let cha know so everyone can see how badly i screwed up.

Last edited by johnso29; 09-23-2011 at 05:18 PM.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices