Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2009, 04:02 PM
  #7551  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
If we're going to go on strike, can we do it now? The DC-9 is getting hotter and hotter and it's not even June yet.
I didn't even get to enjoy the air conditioning of the A320. It's back to the DC9 in June, so I'll be right there with ya New.

I'm looking forward to the DC9 weight loss program. I figure I'll lose at least 5 lbs from all the sweating, and another 5 lbs from all that twisting of those knobs/dials and moving thrust levers.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 04:12 PM
  #7552  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I didn't even get to enjoy the air conditioning of the A320. It's back to the DC9 in June, so I'll be right there with ya New.

I'm looking forward to the DC9 weight loss program. I figure I'll lose at least 5 lbs from all the sweating, and another 5 lbs from all that twisting of those knobs/dials and moving thrust levers.
Yes. The sauna is good for a loss of at least 5 pounds. Being too tired to eat is good for another 5.
newKnow is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 04:19 PM
  #7553  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Yes. The sauna is good for a loss of at least 5 pounds. Being too tired to eat is good for another 5.
I thought sauna was a product of all those good hardy nothern stock, don't ya know. None of it rubbed off on you?
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 04:32 PM
  #7554  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
I thought sauna was a product of all those good hardy nothern stock, don't ya know. None of it rubbed off on you?
Yoo betcha id did.
newKnow is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 04:56 PM
  #7555  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Yes. The sauna is good for a loss of at least 5 pounds. Being too tired to eat is good for another 5.
Great! I'm up to at least 10 lbs, maybe 15 lbs!
johnso29 is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 05:50 PM
  #7556  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
As always Alfa, you've got it backwards. The only reason ANY of us had any leverage to gain anything during mid-contract was because DAL management wanted this merger. You know, the merger with NWA.

But you actually make my point with the above statement. Lee Moak shouldn't get anybody a pay raise, that's the job of the negotiating committee. Except in this union, that's apparently Lee's job also. Along with merger committee, and every other committee. Other people may hold the titles, but nothing happens without the "Dear Leader."



He was almost recalled a few years back by DAL pilots who thought he was acting like a dictator.



I've never said I didn't like Lee. I don't even know him. That is meaningless. What has meaning is that the democratic process of checks and balances is not occurring in our union right now. That's dangerous IMO.

I understand you're one of those "I got mine, so screw everyone else" kind of guys. That's clear. I'm just telling the bottom half of the DAL-S list that their new brothers agree with them. Not with you.

Carl
Let's be clear Carl, the only reason any of us got a penny out of this is because it was Lee's idea. If you don't believe me, then go back and read the transcript of Dave Stevens arbitration testimony and he will tell you so. The negotiators negotiated the deal, but the plan was his. This had never been done before in the history of airline mergers ever. You can thank him at your leisure.

Lee has never been the subject of a recall ever in his tenure as MEC Chairman. Your facts are dead wrong.

You continue your tyrant lecture, but again, no facts, no evidence just your ranting. Can't you even come up with ONE NAME? I mean everyone is getting this treatment, and you can't find one guy who will fess up.

Thanks for the personal attack. I do care about more junior pilots, I still have many years to go so I can hardly characterize myself as I've got mine. I do care about junior pilot, I just want them to get upset at the right things. Everyone is chasing their shadow on this subject and it is just a little funny. How can it be okay for Midwest to fly MD-80's but not E-190's? Answer that question with some relevance and I will join your crusade. Right now, I see a bunch of Don Quixote's tilting at windmills.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 05:55 PM
  #7557  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
THe only problem with this view is that you are overlooking the fact that the regional carrier who will be operating 100 seat aircraft for that other carrier, also provides lift for us using 76 seat airplanes that are the same type certificate to the 100 seaters. It makes a very easy stretch for management to push for scope relaxation to allow them to do the same thing here.
I guess. You know we code share with Alaska that has 737-700, 800, and 900 aircraft. Those are much bigger than an E-190. Having some other company code share on aircraft and allowing that code on your own airline are two different things. Like I said, before the merger we did code sharing with 403 seat aircraft. By the way, we don't allow DL code on Midwest flights.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 06:12 PM
  #7558  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I guess. You know we code share with Alaska that has 737-700, 800, and 900 aircraft. Those are much bigger than an E-190. Having some other company code share on aircraft and allowing that code on your own airline are two different things. Like I said, before the merger we did code sharing with 403 seat aircraft. By the way, we don't allow DL code on Midwest flights.
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I do care about junior pilot, I just want them to get upset at the right things. Everyone is chasing their shadow on this subject and it is just a little funny. How can it be okay for Midwest to fly MD-80's but not E-190's? Answer that question with some relevance and I will join your crusade. Right now, I see a bunch of Don Quixote's tilting at windmills.


alfa,

I admit that I am coming in on the tail end of the argument, but I think the aim is to be able to see things coming and cut them off at the pass. If I'm understanding the situation correctly, the Midwest pilot group has been effectively pushed out and the work has been farmed out to the commuters. If Midwest Express is able to totaly demolish their mainline airline pilot group and then allow their connection carrier to take over their routes with bigger aircraft, we should all be worried, because United, CAL, AMR, and DAL won't be too far behind.

Personally, I think we should also be worried about what UAL is planning on doing with Air Lingus as well. But, the key is that just because the fire is in your neighbors backyard, doesn't mean you shouldn't call 911 and grab a bucket of water.

New K Now

(If that's not what the point of the argument is, forgive me.)
newKnow is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 06:25 PM
  #7559  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I guess. You know we code share with Alaska that has 737-700, 800, and 900 aircraft. Those are much bigger than an E-190. Having some other company code share on aircraft and allowing that code on your own airline are two different things. Like I said, before the merger we did code sharing with 403 seat aircraft. By the way, we don't allow DL code on Midwest flights.
The difference here is Alaska pays their pilots the same as Delta does so there is little cost advantage for Delta to push passengers onto Alaska aircraft over Delta aircraft. Same went for NWA and CAL before the merger. It was better for Delta to put a passenger on a Delta plane from ATL to IAH than it was to put them on a CAL plane. Republic will be flying a 100 seat jet that can fly passengers at a much lower seat mile cost than a DC-9 or MD-88 with pilots that are paid half what the DC-9 and MD-88 guys are paid. It becomes very cost advantageous for Delta to push passengers onto the Republic 190's and park some DC-9's and MD-88's if the 190's start flying routes that Delta currently flies and they are allowed to use the DL code on the Midwest Connect flights.

I'm not too worried about it until they start flowing thought Delta hubs and we expand the codeshare agreement to place our code on the Connect flights. If that happens, it is a much different animal than us codesharing with an airline that flies the same planes for the same pay that we do.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 06:39 PM
  #7560  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Alfa,

I'm like NewK.........a little confused about where your coming from on all this. I get it that your a loyal soldier, and since I wouldn't know LM if I tripped over him in the terminal, I'll just wait till I meet him. I promise he gets his chance at a first impression........just like anyone.

But, just so I know where you stand:

a. Who do you think should fly the 50 seat RJs? The 76 seat RJs etc.

b. Is the EMB-175 an RJ?

c. How do you feel about stapeling Compass to our list?

Easy questions, your limited to one blue book

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices