Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
#7491
I responded by telling him, I was glad he only had one vote.
Furthermore. We as a union need to get people in there that will not even agree to scope concessions much less bring them for a vote.
#7492
We elected Boyd Kelley as the FO rep in LAX. We'll see how he does under the scrutiny of our MEC.
Personally, I don't ever want to hear again that the Regional Jets are good for our pilot group. Mainly, because the Regional Jets are now Transcontinental Jets.
RJ's now TJ's
Personally, I don't ever want to hear again that the Regional Jets are good for our pilot group. Mainly, because the Regional Jets are now Transcontinental Jets.
RJ's now TJ's
#7493
I hope you guys are able to elect representatives that feel strongly about this issue, as council 44 is the power center of our union. I will be a member of Council 44 in the not too distant future, but not in time to have a say.
#7494
Inventory survival kit ..
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
You misunderstand the structure of ALPA. The MEC Chairman is NOT a superior. He/she holds the position entirely at the discretion of the MEC members. The MEC Chairman is not even allowed to vote on any issue. The only job of the MEC Chairman is to execute the majority will of the MEC's voting members.
Again, you misunderstand. The MEC Chairman has no right to APPROVE anything. He/she has NO vote. At best the MEC Chairman can help to calm the passions that happen during debate on big issues, and aid the MEC in deciding a majority opinion. If you think this illustrates a circus, then you are against the very foundation of ALPA's democracy. If you think Lee's dictatorship is the best representation of the professional pilot, then I can't help you.
Again, you misunderstand. The MEC Chairman has no right to APPROVE anything. He/she has NO vote. At best the MEC Chairman can help to calm the passions that happen during debate on big issues, and aid the MEC in deciding a majority opinion. If you think this illustrates a circus, then you are against the very foundation of ALPA's democracy. If you think Lee's dictatorship is the best representation of the professional pilot, then I can't help you.
The power of the MEC chairman lies in being able to control the agenda of a meeting. At fNW the Policy Manual provided that any agenda items to be considered at a scheduled MEC meeting had to be 1) passed at a LEC meeting prior to the MEC meeting OR 2) Submitted by a LEC representative prior to a deadline OR 3) added to the meeting agenda (at any time) by the MEC Chairman.
The MEC Chaiman also controls in what order the agenda items are brought up at a meeting and, depending on the policy manual, controls which LEC reps sit on which subcommittees when they break to debate the merits of agenda items. At fNW and at the BOD, the voting reps are split into subgroups and are assigned a subset of agenda items to debate, amend and recommend/not recommend for passage when they return to the Plenary in front of the entire voting group.
Also at fNW, all of the Committee Chairmen were elected by the LEC reps. I have been told, but have not verified, that at DL all the committee chairmen are APPOINTED by the MEC Chairman.
The exception to this at fNW was the Negotiating Committee and sometimes the Merger Committee. Due to previous merger and seniority issues, all members of those committees were ELECTED by the NW LEC reps.
The MEC Chairman is also usually the one to rule on procedural challenges under Roberts Rules of Order as modified by the MEC Policy Manual.
An unscrupulous MEC Chairman could also choose to withhold important information from the LEC reps to influence their votes on certain issues.
I find that the current MEC lacks transparency on meeting minutes. The fNW LEC reps and Communications Committee would usually have bullet points/summary at the END OF EACH DAY of an OPEN MEC meeting and would disseminate those bullet points by email. Obviously if a meting is closed due to confidentiality, no information would be forthcoming.
I respect your opinion, but I disagree. First of all, we can't hope for a recall. Only the MEC members can recall the Chairman. The MEC members are too afraid to even confont him - much less recall him. The entire MEC needs to be voted out during the next election cycle. Then that new MEC can elect a new chairman.
But IF this current MEC somehow found the grapes to recall Lee, this would be a HUGE message to management: "Do not mess with Scope!" This would not be divide and conquer, it would be a stunning and unified message to management.
Carl
But IF this current MEC somehow found the grapes to recall Lee, this would be a HUGE message to management: "Do not mess with Scope!" This would not be divide and conquer, it would be a stunning and unified message to management.
Carl
1) Don't change horses in mid-stream. If you are in the middle of a difficult series of negotiations, its better to present a united front to management.
2) Don't recall unless you already have an ELECTABLE replacement ready to go at the next meeting. A failed recall is better than a successful one that leaves the MEC with no Chairman due to an inability to agree on a replacement.
SCOPE: I have been a SCOPE Nazi pretty much since I came off pilot probation. Gutting SCOPE is a BadIdea(tm). For those fDL that think otherwise, just remind them that SCOPE is the only reason DALPA had leverage to negotiate LOA19, pay raises and all...
#7495
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
"They are out there. I had a CA ask me when I was hired, I responded, he then stated that it was no wonder I cared about little jets and their outsourcing. Told me, sorry but anytime he can vote to increase his pay, he will, even at the price of scope."
Probably should have got off the trip, told the sked that you were unable to continue the trip with the ***hole. Let the chief pilot take care of it.
Probably should have got off the trip, told the sked that you were unable to continue the trip with the ***hole. Let the chief pilot take care of it.
#7496
No, I see it as a challenge. Plus, he is entitled to his opinion, but I will spend four days poking holes all over it. It makes the time go by a bit quicker.
#7497
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
You know your pilot group better than I do, but for whatever it's worth, that is NOT the opinion of senior NWA pilots. There's not a single one of us that doesn't consider Scope the number one issue. I've said this before: Scope is Section 1 of every ALPA contract for a reason.
I think the junior DAL pilots need to understand this. If you thought you were in the minority before the merger, you now have 5,000 pilots who agree with you completely. I don't know if that will tip the balance, but it couldn't hurt.
Carl
I think the junior DAL pilots need to understand this. If you thought you were in the minority before the merger, you now have 5,000 pilots who agree with you completely. I don't know if that will tip the balance, but it couldn't hurt.
Carl
Why did you go from 160 DC-9's to 60, and have 55 large RJ's at the merger, with no new narrowbody aircraft coming?
If Moak is _so_ bad, why isn't Dave Stevens our MEC Chairman? Or Ray Miller? Or Mark McClain? Why aren't Jim Van Sickle or Bob Hesselbein standing up?
Remember, as you said, the Chairman doesn't have a vote. He serves at the pleasure of the MEC. Moak was just elected January 17.
Delta has had split MEC's in the past. Any Rep is responsible for standing up for his constituents. Are you saying all the FNWA reps are too cowardly to do what they did on your MEC?
Right....
#7498
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
IMore and more junior captains I fly with get it, but at the same time many have the opinion that the give away of scope is a almost a "cultural" issue with our union and pilot group at Delta. It's almost as if, "that's the way it's always been, so that's the way it will always be, there nothing we can do about it". Arghh!!! Guys just roll over. Maybe this from years of burnout from feeling that our union is turning a deaf ear to us.
Any thoughts? Fire away!!!!!!
Any thoughts? Fire away!!!!!!
When you learn it, come back and explain what adding pilots to a seniority list when you don't own the flying they perform does for you...
#7500
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Adding a 76 seat airline when you don't own all 76 seat flying.
Compass brings 36 of the 141 76 seat aircraft currently flying in DCI.
If you can get _all_ the 76 seat flying, then bring them on board. Otherwise, you're just creating hostages to be whipsawed.
Compass brings 36 of the 141 76 seat aircraft currently flying in DCI.
If you can get _all_ the 76 seat flying, then bring them on board. Otherwise, you're just creating hostages to be whipsawed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post