Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2011, 07:10 PM
  #72851  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Windfall? Really?
Not a pay windfall? I agree the terms of the SLI from SWAPA are suspect at best, but I have a feeling most of the Airtran pilots will vote for it, primarily because they will be winning the lottery monetarily. The 717 will pay more than our 764 and A330. You don't think that is a windfall? Are you related to Trump?
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 07:14 PM
  #72852  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 691
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
So, if someone is stupid enough to dump hot coffee of their legs, they should sue for millions? Where do the lawsuits end?
Well, all she wanted was $20,000 (to cover her long hospital stay and surgeries) but McDonald's refused. It has nothing to do with being stupid, it was an accident and McDonald's at the time had hundreds of complaints of people burning themselves because their coffee was too hot. They immediately lowered the temperature of their coffee after this case hit the news. Yes our society might be a bit over litigious but if you make a product and it hurts someone it is not hard to convince a jury that the maker of said product carries some liability. The McDonald's case was legitimate, it was not just some money hungry lady looking for a hand out and this idea that tort reform will make society a better and more efficient entity is just not true. Tort reform takes away your rights as an individual of this country and mandated caps take away the power of juries to award fair decisions. If these TWA pilots are awarded their true damages and then a judge comes in and slashes it by 75% it will be a travesty.
jayray2 is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 07:21 PM
  #72853  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by fartboxflyer
Agreed 100% but the turd in this punch bowl is within Sec 6 neg. rules.

"good faith" is a slippery slope, and the the NMB have "parked" regional pilots recently trying to grab an extra crumb off the floor. We can't ask for the moon any more than the company can ask for our hourly rates be minimum wage.
what is "good faith"? That is a moving, ill defined target. Only the NMB will determine who is getting out of line based upon many factors that economically and politically are years out.
The NMB historically could give a rats ass what we had in C2k. They have a short term memory and tend to be myopic even during the present. Ask for too much in their eyes and they will park negotiations 6 month faster than the speed of heat.
This being said we still should demand and open for every cent that brings us to that edge and carry this fine line throughout the sec 6 process.
I have heard grumblings about this, that the new APA MEC Chair asked for too much and was parked for awhile until he became more "realistic." Of course AMR hasn't been financially very stable lately, and every union there is up for a new contract. Asking for a raise when you are consistantly lacking profitable quarters is one thing, ( profits are subjective too sometimes) but that doesn't mean that Dalpa would be parked, and it doesn't mean Dalpa has to "shoot low" of some imaginary line to hope to get this done faster. Shooting low or having lower expectations only helps the other side, and can leave "earned" money on the table. I hope that doesn't happen with us. I want someone who will PROMOTE us for what we are worth, and compare us to our real peers, not bottom contract dwellers.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 07:45 PM
  #72854  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The insurance company will make the final decision on when to settle. It wont have a major economic impact on ALPA.
Pretty bold statement to stand on there sailing.

Want to bet your life on it?

OK. I'll be realistic. How about your 401K?

Not very many in ALPA presently will agree to bail ALPA out of this mess if there is an assessment to cover what insurance won't/can't pick up.

Game over in that scenario.
TheManager is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 08:08 PM
  #72855  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by jayray2
Well, all she wanted was $20,000 (to cover her long hospital stay and surgeries) but McDonald's refused. It has nothing to do with being stupid, it was an accident and McDonald's at the time had hundreds of complaints of people burning themselves because their coffee was too hot. They immediately lowered the temperature of their coffee after this case hit the news. Yes our society might be a bit over litigious but if you make a product and it hurts someone it is not hard to convince a jury that the maker of said product carries some liability. The McDonald's case was legitimate, it was not just some money hungry lady looking for a hand out and this idea that tort reform will make society a better and more efficient entity is just not true. Tort reform takes away your rights as an individual of this country and mandated caps take away the power of juries to award fair decisions. If these TWA pilots are awarded their true damages and then a judge comes in and slashes it by 75% it will be a travesty.
Years ago when this woman won her case I was, as a anti trial lawyer pro business conservative, outraged. Mainly because the story was framed as something like winning millions from Disney because you were stung by a bee at Disney world. Oddly by left media sources framed it this way and I think they did it because it created a tizzy and they live off that.

But when I took a business law class and we went over this case, it made sense why she won and won so much. It really isn't what people think.

Obviously, that's 1 case. Back in the day when a pilot runs out of gas in his twenty year old twin cessna and instead of gliding down he manages to spin it into the ground and his family sues and wins millions from Cessna, yeah, total %@#%@!#%#%.

I think Trial Lawyers are by and large disgusting. But this TWA case, pilots are owed money and if it costs $1.4 billion then it costs $1.4 billion. More power to them.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 08:18 PM
  #72856  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Again I've got to ask- DALPA does not want us to make less than SWA/AirTran pilots for equal work, right?

As to the cost argument. My power bill is what it is no matter what my revenue is. If we're going down this road then I want Delta pilots pay to be based off a % of last years revenue. Not profit. Revenue.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 08:28 PM
  #72857  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

The lower Dalpa can aim, the more likely they will attain it, and maybe stay in office longer? "See, I got you what WE WERE ASKING FOR....."
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 08:39 PM
  #72858  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I just flew with a captain who looked at the contract comparison and replied, "it looks like we're doing pretty good compared to the rest of the industry." He told me he expects less than a 5% raise per year.
Hearing this kind of stuff makes me want to pull my hair out.....




Ok. I'm back......


newKnow is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 08:51 PM
  #72859  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
So, if someone is stupid enough to dump hot coffee of their legs, they should sue for millions? Where do the lawsuits end?
Mc Donalds deserved that lawsuit several times over. It wasn't just the temperature of the coffee that was the problem, it was the sturdiness of the cups, too. Just to make a few pennies more per pot.

Notice how their coffee cups are now?
newKnow is offline  
Old 08-02-2011, 08:53 PM
  #72860  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigGuns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 767-400
Posts: 797
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I just flew with a captain who looked at the contract comparison and replied, "it looks like we're doing pretty good compared to the rest of the industry." He told me he expects less than a 5% raise per year.
That comparison was BS and should have not been published. It shows us making more than AA US UAL and CAL, all of which are EXPIRED CONCESSIONARY contacts. Typical ALPA crap, & it is get old quick.

APA is currently doing roadshows that are telling their pilots about current status of negotiations. They are telling their pilots to plan on a TA by fall with rates similar to FedEx.
Guess we will see....

If this pans out for APA... DPA will probably get alot more cards this fall!
BigGuns is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices