Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2011, 09:26 AM
  #70381  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Where do you live?
In Bellevue on the eastside of Lake Washington in the Seattle area.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 09:29 AM
  #70382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A-320/A
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Nope... you're right. ALPA has figured out the best way to do EVERYTHING, so who in the hell am I to try to think of another way to do anything? But of course DAL would go out and buy a 767 that they cannot fill.. requires MORE flight attendants... and everything just to screw the pilots... but typically, when anyone questions the way the "best" does things, float the furlough argument, and that will get everyone back in line.

I'm not even gonna threaten ALPA with doing anything if they get this stuff wrong, because I know that is impossible since they have the best lawyers, "volunteers" and negotiators there are. Besides, when the time comes, it will be too late. So we are stuck with the "best" association there is... (And before you say it, no.. I have not sent in a card... yet) Your arguments are always beyond reproach, you know exactly what 12,000 guys want... truly an amazing organization and I am lucky to be able to pay to be a member. That is why they are so good at all of this. I will go back to my coloring books and speak no more of this. Now PG, get your brainiacs to fix my f$@*^# retirement... oops.. too late.

I hope the whale pays $600/hour, because that is the only way anybody else is gonna make any money... Good luck Carl.
Hi Tsquare,
I (think I) agree with you. I'm cynically optimistic with our current union. But I swear, If the reps come to us, the membership, with anything less than an opener of approximately a 50% raise, PLUS improvements in scope, I'm sending in my card to DPA, and getting vocal WRT supporting same. If the negotiating strategy is 15-25% payraise, that is merely a continuance of a bankruptcy contract. Our union had better get this right, the first time. By all accounts, anybody on this property >15 years (12 year payscale), captain or Jr wide-body copilot, has given the company approximately 300K in wages over the last 6 years. Enough of bankruptcy wages & contracts.
chuck416 is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 09:31 AM
  #70383  
Get's Every Day Off
 
ExAF's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Well, my wife has 4 of those!! But they are pushovers. Right now it looks like the cost of replacing the door is going to be the biggest expense!! Go figure..... Thanks for the thought.

Denny
4 of those? Are you talking little white fluff balls or REAL dogs? When it comes to theft deterence, there is a difference you know.
ExAF is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 09:32 AM
  #70384  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Is this about scope? Do we have a hardline faction vs. a more "flexible" group on the MEC?
Maybe the line pilots would like to provide some input if this is a major turning point in our approach to the future.
How did scope get introduced into a question about electing a negotiating committee? Seems like some are looking to sow drama where there is none.

Your questions were already answered on the DALPA forum, and I believe you've logged on since it was posted. No and No.

Line pilots should always provide input to their elected reps. That's how the system works....12,000 + inputs into a collective decision made by the elected representatives. Then the pilot group gets to vote.
slowplay is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 09:46 AM
  #70385  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Oh man, so sorry to hear! Glad they heard the garage door open and took off vs you walking in on them.

Forget everything juice is on me in NRT! I agree with Slow, nothing like what you're going through, but I had a laptop stolen going through security once and that sick to your stomach feeling does go away in time....

Thanks Ferd. I'm kind of thinking it might have been one or two teenage girls with a crowbar. Both the cop and I were wondering why the didn't just break the glass in the door (it's got an almost full length glass panel in it). It had to take them awhile to get in judging by the damage to the door. Then it seems like they made a beeline for my wifes stuff and bypassed much more lucrative booty! Some of her dresser drawers were open along with a drawer on her nightstand and makeup table. The only things we can find missing I have mentioned before. Heck, this netbook I'm typing from was sitting on the kitchen counter!!!

It seems to me this breakin was VERY unorganized which leads me to believe it was a couple of kids. I'm just shocked at the stuff they didn't take that was laying around. They are going to be very disappointed with the value if they try to fence anything!!

One of these days I'll get over to NRT when you are there!

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 09:53 AM
  #70386  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
How did scope get introduced into a question about electing a negotiating committee? Seems like some are looking to sow drama where there is none.
You know why scope is always at issue. People don't trust ALPA on the issue.
Simple as that.

Your questions were already answered on the DALPA forum, and I believe you've logged on since it was posted. No and No.
Yeah, but I logged on and read your answers on that forum AFTER posting the same question on this one.
Anyway, thanks for the straight answer.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 09:54 AM
  #70387  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Denny, I am sorry that happened.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 09:57 AM
  #70388  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

The First Annual July 4th Fireworks at 80ktsclamp's Crib (Home)!

"It's not rocket science. That'd take the fun out of it. Now FTB stand right here..."
-80ktsclamp


Last edited by forgot to bid; 07-10-2011 at 10:25 AM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 10:00 AM
  #70389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
There seems to be some disarray in our team.
I thought that was the major reason people gave for opposing the DPA right now. We didn't want to have change and disarray so close to section 6 talks. But now were going to change negotiators and that's OK?

I agree that changing these committee members should normally be a routine matter and no big deal, but this seems different. This looks like some sort of "showdown" over direction and philosophy. Is that the case?
Would any insiders care to explain for us rank and file types what is really going on here?

Is this about scope? Do we have a hardline faction vs. a more "flexible" group on the MEC?
Maybe the line pilots would like to provide some input if this is a major turning point in our approach to the future.

My answer is that this is just more mudslinging. We do not have some hardline faction vs. a more flexible group. Anyone that thinks or acts like there are factions or sub groups on the MEC is wrong headed and needs to change their thinking. There are just ideas and ideas differ.

TSquare wants longevity based pay and I don't. Do we have to get into personal attacks where he is socialist and I am fascist or he is hard line and I am flexible? Can it just be that we have different ideas, we debate the merits, the group decides and then we move on as a team.

Think about any team that is effective. What do you think when you see a sports team give interviews after the game when the offense blames the defense and the defense blames the offense and the coach claims the team isn't following his instructions. Do you think, "Wow that is an effective team that is bound for success"? Or do you think, "That is a group getting ready to implode"? What would you think of a Captain you are flying with that starts to blame you for every delay and every bump you encounter in your flights. Great leader or loser passing the buck?

Look at effective organizations and you will never see an effective organization that spends any time at all playing the blame game or spewing out their personal fears and questions in public. Some say this is Nazi like regimentation of opinion but that is hogwash. Effective organizations play out their differences in private and then move forward as a team. No public handwringing, no second guessing, move forward as one. If this MEC can't get that together then we are done for.

This doesn't mean you don't step back and evaluate where you are going and change direction when necessary. The average time between today and election for most of these MEC members is less than 2 years. That means that the pilots have chosen their representatives, they represent the democratic will of the group and they are the legitimate leaders of our union. I expect them to work out their differences as a group, in private as much as possible, and then move on. That is how I feel about this issue at hand. Let the MEC work out their issues and then move on.

If some think that trying to tar and feather people based on rumors and gossip mongering will make us stronger, then they are sadly mistaken. We are facing a group that will always present a unified front and if we continue to play these stupid games where silly human pride wins out over supporting the team, we WILL GET RUN OVER. Like you read about.

You can take a dart and throw it at the seniority list and pick out the first three guys who the dart lands on and make them your negotiating committee. Give them some training and put a strong unified team behind them and they will succeed. Find the best three negotiators in the universe and have them work for a divided, bickering group that trashes each other when their silly human pride gets in the way and they will fail. 100% of the time. Find any negotiator in any business and they will tell you the same thing.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 07-10-2011, 10:09 AM
  #70390  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 109
Default

Alfa,
Should be keep an open mind about relaxing scope?

Should we absolutely rule out any relaxation in scope and make it public?

Reasonable people can disagree on some items, but relaxing scope any further is just not reasonable period!
Ball Breaker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices