Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2011, 11:00 AM
  #70191  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
My guess is that the current committee called Seal Team 6 to rescue them from the bunker, now the MEC needs to bring them in, dead or alive.
Why do they need to be rescued? They seem to be doing fine to me.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:07 AM
  #70192  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Default

So much BK talk I'm catching up with reading here that I need to post a commercial break.

Jesse is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:08 AM
  #70193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default



Madddog or Shuttle?

Cheers
George

Last edited by georgetg; 07-08-2011 at 11:13 AM. Reason: picture linky
georgetg is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:13 AM
  #70194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Branson wants out and that also puts VAmerica in play...

This will get very ugly.

Cheers
George
What could we possibly want with VA? If its their awesome A319/320's, couldn't we just order them on our own? We need WAY more than what they have, and please don't mention their meaningless letters of intent of their fantasy start up fleet plan where every start up claims they will order 400 jets and fly to every single city or whatever.

We will be placing a massive order soon and everyone knows this. I'm sure a global powerhouse with an improving balance sheet can more than beat the terms of a tiny egomaniac driven start up thats always down to their last 20 million when it comes to terms of aircraft orders.

In the extremely unlikely event we decide to get their planes cause RB wants out, we can take those over through the leasing companies way outside the realm of any merger.
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:41 AM
  #70195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
What could we possibly want with VA? If its their awesome A319/320's, couldn't we just order them on our own? We need WAY more than what they have, and please don't mention their meaningless letters of intent of their fantasy start up fleet plan where every start up claims they will order 400 jets and fly to every single city or whatever.

We will be placing a massive order soon and everyone knows this. I'm sure a global powerhouse with an improving balance sheet can more than beat the terms of a tiny egomaniac driven start up thats always down to their last 20 million when it comes to terms of aircraft orders.

In the extremely unlikely event we decide to get their planes cause RB wants out, we can take those over through the leasing companies way outside the realm of any merger.
I never said merger...
OTOH there is a real possibility that is Plan-C for the West Coast...

Consolidation is inevitable and marginal players will be assimilated one way or another. VA hasn't-ever-made-money...

Cheers
George
georgetg is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:43 AM
  #70196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
I have two high hopes for C2012:
That those who were hit hardest by the events of the last 10 years be made substantially whole.
That we grow as an airline by minimizing as much as feasible flying performed on behalf of Delta by non-Delta pilots.
I like both goals, george. But EVERYONE was hit by the events of the last 10 years, and there will never be enough money to make everyone whole. Having said that, we should get substantial improvements, but trying to allocate that to some group who thinks they were harmed worse than another is a recipe for a food fight of gigantic proportions.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:43 AM
  #70197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Where is Glen Hauenstein?
Finance is trying to hold the line with cost containment. The downside in their eyes to the international expansion the past few years is that it costs a lot more to maintain than the domestic operation. As a result, I would not be surprised to see a lot more international cuts this fall. As we abandon these cities we will leave UAL/CAL with exclusivity in these markets. They will get increased corporate accounts because of this.

Glen wants to dominate the world and if we don't let him, I would be worrying about his exit. The fight will be whether we follow the current US corporate mantra of controlling costs for short term gains or looking at long term success that is achieved through a higher cost structure in the near term.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:50 AM
  #70198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
It's an average of 13.464 years for all of the international fleet and here is the break out of the individual fleet from the April 1, 2011 count:

747-400 . Fleet Total: 16 . Average Age 17.6
757-200 . Fleet Total: 33 . Average Age 14.1
767-300ER . Fleet Total: 58 . Average Age 15.3
767-400ER . Fleet Total: 21 . Average Age 10.3
777-200 . Fleet Total: 8 . Average Age 11.5
777-200LR . Fleet Total: 10 . Average Age 2.3
A330-200 . Fleet Total: 11 . Average Age 6.3
A330-300 . Fleet Total: 12 . Average Age 5.9
Total 169
I think you might have transposed the A333 number (21 vice 12) That would raise the total you have listed to 178 aircraft. The management slides that I was looking at are from a the investor relations site and a presentation to Wall Street that showed 175 airplanes. The current active fleet shows 169 with only 25 757ER. I don't know if that changes the age much, so take it FWIW.
slowplay is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 12:08 PM
  #70199  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER
Finance is trying to hold the line with cost containment. The downside in their eyes to the international expansion the past few years is that it costs a lot more to maintain than the domestic operation. As a result, I would not be surprised to see a lot more international cuts this fall. As we abandon these cities we will leave UAL/CAL with exclusivity in these markets. They will get increased corporate accounts because of this.

Glen wants to dominate the world and if we don't let him, I would be worrying about his exit. The fight will be whether we follow the current US corporate mantra of controlling costs for short term gains or looking at long term success that is achieved through a higher cost structure in the near term.
Of note, Glen has been very quiet lately.

Also, the AF/DAL JV's assumption is that one stop connections will work this fall in Europe. If you look at the cuts, they are designed to keep the AF 380 and 777's full. We got ORD-CDG to keep the JV ESK's relatively equal (With in the limits of the JV) but the goal was to have more connecting traffic out of CDG.
You may also see more International Cuts announced for this fall in the next few weeks.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-08-2011, 12:11 PM
  #70200  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Carl, I acknowledge - that was a bad use of words. What I meant to say was one was at the helm right up until the time DAL entered bankruptcy; then a different MEC Chairman was elected. How those two approached the job is a function of the circumstances each found themselves in.

The entire Delta pilot group had rose colored glasses on right up until the time bankruptcy was declared. The pension was heading down the toilet for several years while thousands left yet nothing was done. We kept getting contractually negotiated pay raises, while the corporation was losing billions. Disabled pilots have their disability payments for life, and even got their benefit plussed up when the pension terminated.

Bankruptcy was a bucket of ice water thrown in our faces, and in my opinion, the true wake up call. The new MEC and MEC Admin made the most of it, despite the horrible circumstances. Labor definitely loses, and loses big in every bankruptcy, but to somehow lay the blame on where we are at the feet of the union, is also to deny that 9/11 is the real reason.
I agree with you PG, and for anyone to claim that the union was to blame for where we are is just plain wrong...except one area: Scope. The "best and brightest" lawyers at ALPA were in on the writing of Scope language that they now say had huge flaws in it, and they now refuse to even attempt to defend.

If I had told you that I wanted to be our legal wording watchdog for the Scope language back then, you would have correctly stated that I didn't have the training or expertise. You would have correctly stated that you didn't want me in charge of looking out for your interests regarding scope. Yet the results couldn't be worse if I HAD done it...and I would have charged as much as our best and brightest lawyers did.

Scope is laid direrctly at the feet of ALPA. Everything else in your post I agree with.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices