Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2011, 05:05 AM
  #69691  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
Do you have buddies at SWA?? I do and I've seen what they make and how much they work. I don't care what you or anyone from ALPA tries to sell, they make WAY more than us and work WAY less than us.

I don't know who you are, but if you have anything to do with ALPA it is people who act like you, and Salingfun, that have pushed 1/4 of the Delta pilots to support DPA and are doing a great job of helping them get even more cards on a daily basis. Good job, keep up the good work. Hopefully you can help us get a union that will take what SWA makes and fight like hell to get that plus more for Delta pilots instead of trying to tell us we don't know what we are talking about.
All right, here is a quote straight from the DPA website:

Our contract goals should consider the profitability of the company and outside financial analysis should provide us with objective opinions on how our company can function under a given proposal.
So even DPA knows that the basis of your contract is the financial condition of the company that you work for. If you are going to negotiate, then you have to start with an accurate picture. If you pull out some propaganda from a flyer that is meant to persuade other pilots to accept a bad seniority integration, then you might as well ask the negotiators to put on a clown suit. You have to have credibility both with the people you are negotiating against and with the NMB that has the power to suspend your negotiations indefinitely.

So, everyone would like more money and more time off. Get over yourself and realize that everyone has the same goal, it is just that to accomplish your goal, you can't act like an idiot and expect any results. Maybe that will give some brief moment of Zen on the internet to spout off how tough you are, but in the end I want more money. Losing your head and making a fool of yourself is not the way to get it. Period.

So I don't know who you are, but you have convinced me that I don't want you running the show. Emotional rants will get me nothing.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:11 AM
  #69692  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
SWAPA has never fought for or achieved a thing. They simply accepted sub standard contracts throughout their history. Normally about 20 percent below the rest of the industry when generally their airline was the most profitable around. It sounds like you missed the events in the industry from 2001 to 2006 so I wont get into detail on how they got to the top of the pay scale however you can google it.
They are not going to fight to stay at the top and want us to regain our historical advantage. You might review the history of their contracts and what they normally signed for.
There is one union that has been fighting hard for the last 5 years. That is APA. They have fought long and hard. They have achieved however nothing. You need to fight hard but also smart.
SWAPA contract is not good enough as I have pointed out. When you go into negotiations and try and compare yourself to some other airline they are going to use total block hour costs. I don't want that comparison. I want a lot more.
while i respect your loyalty to DAL, you are wrong about SWA,(DISCLOSURE,i have immediate family flying for them),their union is focused on their pilot group alone and has achieved great things for them,ALPA national is a contradiction ,representing groups whose interests are diametrically opposed and trying to be a fair arbiter to all,good luck with that. I have no skin in your game but i think you would be better served with a union devoted to your people and your concerns (read:SCOPE<SCOPE<SCOPE),anyway happy 4th !!! Good luck gents I have a lot of buds at DAL.
727C47 is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:14 AM
  #69693  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
No double standard... just a different standard. SWAPA has never given me any reason to doubt what they say or their intentions.
That publication also is a management kool-aid drinkers paradise. 10 pages are devoted to how wonderful the company is and how they have picnic together, etc.

I thought that an union should NOT carry the company's water?

It is a publication that 'brags' on SWA pilots, its not filled with 10-k numbers, actual bid results, end of month numbers, etc. Just one or two anecdotal trip trades....remember that the guy who "dropped" the low time trip in the example to pick up, one person is now flying one less trip that month and/or someone else had to fly the lower time trip be it a reserve or a line holder. Its an "I LUV Me....and So Should You" rag. Little more.

Again, you hold up SWA as a model.... You're shooting way too low and damaging MY chances of a better outcome on the next PWA.
shiznit is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:14 AM
  #69694  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
And you of course have proof of this, right?

The data in the SWAPA welcome document to the ValuTran pilots seems pretty straightforward to me. Read it again. I don't think you can explain it away that easily. And I highly doubt they have their facts wrong as I'm sure they have access to the actual data.

Where did your data come from? Anecdotal evidence from talking with a few of your friends? Sorry, but I think I'll go with the official numbers published by the folks who have access to the actual data... not a guy on an anonymous web board who constantly argues against any kind of restorative increases for our pilot group.
See previous post.
shiznit is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:22 AM
  #69695  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default Sky Team

The beginning of Sky Team Airlines:
Air France-KLM to Follow BA With M&A-Friendly Management Model - Bloomberg
sinca3 is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:25 AM
  #69696  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
On a completely unrelated topic, hopefully less controversial.

I'm an ex-military guy, but I've got a friend coming over for July 4th with two high schoolers interested in our profession. For the young civilian guys out there: what's the best route now a days, assuming money is no object?

Much appreciated.
Air National Guard.

Avoid active mil, too long a commitment now (wings +10), and you might end up flying a desktop computer.

Any 4 year college and go to the local flight school. Least expensive route by far, but doesn't offer the ability to create connections in the industry (See FTB's roomate), that can translate to 2-5 years of a headstart.

a 4 Year university with a flight program (Purdue, Auburn, Ariz. Stat., Ohio State., a few smaller state schools (U Minn. St. Cloud, Mid. Tenn. St. Univ., etc.) Positives are lots of accredited internship oppotunities, many industry connections, reasonable prices(state schools), and also the option to change majors into many other areas and not have to change schools, lots of extracurricular options, and a more traditional "college experience".

Private 4 year schools (ERAU?), really, really expensive, but you do get the internship opportunities and industry connections that are very helpful. If the person decides to change majors to something outside aviation, transferring is pretty much the only option.

Any 4 year anywhere and then go to a pilot academy, AllATP's, knock out all the ratings in 9 months right after graduation (can be kinda pricey, but effective in the amount of time spent) get into flight instructing and onto a 121 job soon thereafter.
shiznit is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:31 AM
  #69697  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by cni187
Just had a guy in the jumpseat today that said this exact same thing. He was a dude involved in ALPA stuff but quit cuz he got fed up. Said DPA is around 3000 now but that we shouldn't split up before a contract negotiation
Rumor. Speculation.

No "ALPA dude" will spout numbers (well anyone in a capacity to have a direct effect on neg. (LEC/MEC/NC).

Once again.....DALPA has not polled the pilots yet........It is coming this summer/early fall.....

Ask anyone who was around for the C2K contract survey when it came out!!!!!

There is almost 18 months until the Amendable date, and there are 3 Legacy airlines who are already in talks. When(if) one of those 3 inks a new deal that is above the current SWA deal, all of the people who wanted DALPA to make a public campaign of "We want SWA" will look like fools for setting the bar too low. Now you go into negotiations and have hurt the leverage of the NC when the Company goes "You just said for a year that you wanted SWA, here it is...." when AA or UCAL may have exceeded that by 5-10-15%!!!!!
shiznit is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 05:33 AM
  #69698  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
If you do not like what you are getting from your Reps, force the issue. If that does not work recall them. Once recalled, put someone in that beleives what you do, and have them change the leaders of ALPA.

If you cannot get enough support for that sort of drive, it is, because the majority of the pilots in your base do not agree with the position.

The contract survey is not out yet, but will be by early fall. It is on about the same timeline that the survey was done for C2K.
When are the next elections? Prior to the contract or opener? If not, and the opener is weak, then we have a year or two before the contract is done, which is enough time to vote in DPA. That could delay a contract, but it will more reflect what the group wants.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 06:18 AM
  #69699  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirty's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A330B
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
All right, here is a quote straight from the DPA website:



So even DPA knows that the basis of your contract is the financial condition of the company that you work for. If you are going to negotiate, then you have to start with an accurate picture. If you pull out some propaganda from a flyer that is meant to persuade other pilots to accept a bad seniority integration, then you might as well ask the negotiators to put on a clown suit. You have to have credibility both with the people you are negotiating against and with the NMB that has the power to suspend your negotiations indefinitely.

So, everyone would like more money and more time off. Get over yourself and realize that everyone has the same goal, it is just that to accomplish your goal, you can't act like an idiot and expect any results. Maybe that will give some brief moment of Zen on the internet to spout off how tough you are, but in the end I want more money. Losing your head and making a fool of yourself is not the way to get it. Period.

So I don't know who you are, but you have convinced me that I don't want you running the show. Emotional rants will get me nothing.

This kind of propaganda reminds me of being a new hire at DAL when crew scheduling comes in and shows you how the one captain is successfully doing "Rolling Thunder". They spun it in such a way that I could expect that as the norm... as a new hire on reserve.

However, I have many good friends at SWA and they certainly make more than I do with more days off.

So I guess what I'm trying to say is that while their memo to the tranny guys looks like pure propaganda the fact still remains that my buddies at SWA still make more (way more on reserve) and enjoy more days off.
Dirty is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 06:45 AM
  #69700  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
That publication also is a management kool-aid drinkers paradise. 10 pages are devoted to how wonderful the company is and how they have picnic together, etc.

I thought that an union should NOT carry the company's water?
Actually, I think under normal circumstances the union and management should work together. SWA has a management that values and respects its employees. And they back that up with the way they TREAT their employees. That's the way business is supposed to work! From what I've seen, I think SWAPA's relationship with management is appropriate. DALPA's relationship with DAL management is a completely different story, IMO.

But the bottom line on the ValuTran welcome publication (as it relates to our discussion here) is this: Is it factual or not? Does the average SWA Captain make over $230k or not? Does the average SWA F/O make over $140k or not? Do they average working 12 days per month? If this data is true, then they are being paid WAY more than Delta's domestic narrowbody pilots... and working LESS days! Any attempt to minimize the importance and relevance of that to us, is just spin and an attempt to lower our expectations.

Originally Posted by shiznit
It is a publication that 'brags' on SWA pilots, its not filled with 10-k numbers, actual bid results, end of month numbers, etc. Just one or two anecdotal trip trades....remember that the guy who "dropped" the low time trip in the example to pick up, one person is now flying one less trip that month and/or someone else had to fly the lower time trip be it a reserve or a line holder. Its an "I LUV Me....and So Should You" rag. Little more.

Again, you hold up SWA as a model.... You're shooting way too low and damaging MY chances of a better outcome on the next PWA.
I don't think you've proven anything with your "anecdotal trip trade" example. And maybe I am shooting too low. I'd like for our MD-88/90 Captains to make more than $230,000 per year. Heck, I'd like to make $1 million per year. But we have to deal in reality. To get our MD-88/90 Captains to $230k would require about a 57% increase to our current pay rates. If you want to shoot for more than that, I'm all for it. But good luck with that with ALPA as our bargaining agent. I'll be surprised if their opening position will be even a 30% pay increase.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices