Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2011, 06:49 AM
  #69341  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Why is this math so challenging?

IF we don't get an interim agreement before 2013, and
IF AirTran pilots are brought to SWA pay parity in the next 18 months, and
IF you are only looking at the 10-15% of 777 pilots on reserve...

This is more typical Carl math. Only in Carl land, is $210 greater than $217.

Having said all that, I agree 100% that we should be making SWA rates on our comparable airplane and we should be indexed up from there for the bigger equipment. But if you think the donut boys, who are trying to ensure we will be having a representational vote right in the middle of Section 6 negotiations, are the avenue to success, there's nothing more I can say.
PG, welcome back from vacation and time to go revive that thread you wanted to play with before you left, but what Hoser mentioned below is what I'm getting at, the W2 will be greater at $210 x 78 then $217 x 70 and of course I'm not counting 401K just hourly pay for the most junior pilot of equal longevity.

Sure $217 and $210 is close, but this doesn't sound close to me:
A SWA pilot on reserve will make $14,000 more than a Delta 747 or 777 pilot on reserve even though one can only be called out on short notice to fly a 122-137 seat jet domestically while the other could be called out on short notice to fly a 390+ seat or 270+ seat jet to other side of the planet which may be to the west, to the east or over the north pole; who knows where but make sure you pack your bags because you'll probably be gone for 1 to 2 weeks.
Originally Posted by hoserpilot

Don't worry Carl, I got it. The W2 is what matters and Swa/Airtran, when combined, will be higher. Even a simple Canadian can figure that out. (-:
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 06:54 AM
  #69342  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by vprMatrix
I would point out that you are a RES pilot and while you have flown a lot for a RES I would but the avg ER pilot has a lower credit ratio than you. (I have no data to back that up though) My block to credit ratio is around 1.7 for the last 12 months right now so I should not complain.

I also think that the avg NB Delta pilot flies very close to the number of actual hours that a SWA pilot does. I would guess within 5-6 hours a month or 60-72 hours per year. There is little to no credit in the domestic trips so what you fly is what you get.

I have a feeling that most would fly an extra 5-6 hours per month with an avg extra day or two "OFF" in order to make much more money.

International is a different story and skews the numbers when trying to make a good comparison.

In any event. I wholeheartedly agree that we need more soft money in the next contract. Leg-by-leg cnx pay, and 6+ hrs minimum calendar day pay for all pilots, and 75 hr min guarantee are a must for the next contract.

In fact with a 6:15 min day I could let the leg-by-leg cnx pay think go.
Correct, but I used last years numbers because I flew over guarantee almost every month. If you really want to look at the numbers of a line pilot who is filling up every month, then look at the fact that most flying 88 hrs average a month with little to no credit. That proves the point further that soft time is more important. It will also be the hardest thing to get back besides scope. Less credit means more efficiency, and that is where they are aiming. If DAL had their way all of the trip and duty rigs would go bye bye, and we would get only hard time.

I agree, a better min day, not a duty period average or duty period min is needed. Many scoff at that, but these 10.30 hr three days that guys are flying 18 hrs in a month to get to the LCW are insane.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:03 AM
  #69343  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I don't know a single rep working at Dalpa who believes we should be paid less then SWA in the next contract. When you make the comparison however the number that will count and be the number used by the NMB is total block hour costs not hourly pay rates. Pilots tend to have a focus on pay rates when there are so many other important area's in the contract that we need to make priorities.
I bet not a single pilot at this airline want's to make less than SWA but we're talking about an initial 25%-30+% raise to come up to parity if you believe a MD88 = SWA735/717.

So are reps pushing for a 25% to 30% plus raise at the outset?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:09 AM
  #69344  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by chuck416
Would a 79 hr guarantee on reserve be worth all days being short-call? Good question, but clearly, improvements are needed. 70 hr guarantee is too low. Anybody disagree?
Modification from the floor:
  • 70 hour guarantee is fine
  • Every period of short call generates same 5:15 credit as pilots flying a trip
  • Allow pilots to bid for as much short call as they can stand
  • Status Quo w/ regard to max days on (no morons working 26 days a month)
  • Allow reserves to white slip
The concept of having short call pay credit over long call is important IMHO. Short call requires a pilot to commute and prevents them from doing something else. It is like being at work, but not being paid. Further, some short call assignments seem to be manipulated to keep reserves above 50 and below 70 hours a month. When tying to pick up over 70 they always assign a short call that takes you out contention.

I'm all for working and getting paid for it. Those who don't want to commute for reserve could use the long call to their advantage too.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:15 AM
  #69345  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Superdad's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Posts: 397
Default

I recently flew with a MSP Captain who told me that he would go for a 12% pay increase, an additional 10% company contribution to 401k, and a significant reduction in health insurance premiums, all to add up to what he called a roughly 30% pay raise.

discuss...

p.s. this idea is being floated by some of the reps...
Superdad is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:21 AM
  #69346  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
I note that you left out of your tidbits that when on reserve SWA stands 15 shortcalls of 15 hours per month, with a 2 hour callout window. I believe their guarantee is 78 hours, but I'll have to double check. Are you leaving out some of the detes?
No, I did what alfa suggested and looked it up on this website. It didn't say anything about SC/month as it was a PAY RATE page. It would have taken me longer than 17 seconds to do more in-depth research.

For everyone else:

As I posted earlier, THE CURRENT SWA CA PAYRATE IS NOT $210/hr, ITS $212/hr minus a few pennies.

Its a $5/hr difference from 747/777 pay at DAL.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:21 AM
  #69347  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
SWA just negotiated the pay rate for the 800. If they did not ask for a different pay rate during that negotiation its unlikely they will on the 2012 contract. SWAPA does not actually like the result of being at the top of the pay scales. They would like nothing better then for other airlines to regain their historical advantage. Being at the top has led to stagnation and no growth for the first time in their history. They have essentially had their current pay rates since 2002 and have asked for only token raises since then. Don't look for any major push on SWAPA's part for any large raises or changes in the contract in 2012. The critical negotiations for Delta pilots are USAir, American and United. It does not appear likely that any of those airlines will reach a agreement prior to our amendable date.
Why should this contract be any different than in years past? I don't buy your argument about them not liking being on top though. But I am sure they aren't gonna set any bars.. they never have before....
tsquare is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:22 AM
  #69348  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Superdad
I recently flew with a MSP Captain who told me that he would go for a 12% pay increase, an additional 10% company contribution to 401k, and a significant reduction in health insurance premiums, all to add up to what he called a roughly 30% pay raise.

discuss...

p.s. this idea is being floated by some of the reps...
I dislike the 12%, like the 10% DC bump and would like lower premiums. I see this group voting for a SWA+8-15%, with the others as part of the deal. It would equate to about a 42% increase.

Must haves are fixing 23K. They go to the bottom of the bucked, what Bucking just wrote, the 5th and 6th weeks of vacation returning, and fixing the min day to a min day not a DPA or a DPM, and adding sick time. First and foremost is a Domestic Cabatoge clause that protects us from an end round in Sky Team, a sunset of DCI agreements, and the ability of our section on not just to bound DAL coded flying by any holding company or corporation that does a metal neutral, code share, interline, etc agreement with.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:22 AM
  #69349  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Superdad
I recently flew with a MSP Captain who told me that he would go for a 12% pay increase, an additional 10% company contribution to 401k, and a significant reduction in health insurance premiums, all to add up to what he called a roughly 30% pay raise.

discuss...

p.s. this idea is being floated by some of the reps...
Put the cash in the paycheck. If the good Captain wants to pump his 401K, he can make that selection. We are big boys and can make that decision for ourselves.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:22 AM
  #69350  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by Superdad
I recently flew with a MSP Captain who told me that he would go for a 12% pay increase, an additional 10% company contribution to 401k, and a significant reduction in health insurance premiums, all to add up to what he called a roughly 30% pay raise.

discuss...

p.s. this idea is being floated by some of the reps...
Unacceptable, no mention about Scope improvements.
Nosmo King is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices