Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2011, 07:14 PM
  #69301  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Carl, I find this laughable. What makes you think AirTran pilots will be making more than 777 Captains in 2013? SWA pilots maybe, but not AirTran....
I don't find either this statement nor your attitude about it at all laughable. It is pathetic. SWA maybe????? After we supposedly restore our contract? YGTBFKM. IF we continue with this asinine seat/equipment pay, a SWA pilot better not be making half of what a 777 pilot is making. I used to find a modicum of sympathy and agreement with some of your posts, but this is so pathetic words escape me... you must be either a management stooge or a troll from SWA, because no DAL pilot would write anything like that. Go away please.

Last edited by tsquare; 06-29-2011 at 07:29 PM.
tsquare is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:16 PM
  #69302  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
Pay rates are great, but I think we should mostly be focusing on other ways to increase compensation, like bringing back significant night pay, big nums for international pay, and a huge (x4) increase in per diem. And pay from sign in to doors open. Larger minimum calendar day, not duty period. These are all ways to make significantly more cash, some tax advantaged, with lower increases to hourly rates. That way the company gets to tell the financial community that we only gave x when the reality is much more.
Yessir... but I fixed part of your post. I hope you don't mind.
tsquare is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:19 PM
  #69303  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Yessir... but I fixed part of your post. I hope you don't mind.
Yeah, i can get on board with that
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:24 PM
  #69304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,590
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
Pay rates are great, but I think we should mostly be focusing on other ways to increase compensation, like bringing back significant night pay, big nums for international pay, and a huge (x4) increase in per diem. And pay from doors closed to open. Larger minimum calendar day, not duty period. These are all ways to make significantly more cash, some tax advantaged, with lower increases to hourly rates. That way the company gets to tell the financial community that we only gave x when the reality is much more.

Raising per diem that much would not be a smart move. There is no real tax advantage once you reach the accepted deductions for transport workers for meal expenses. The IRS is quite wise to move pay into other areas to try and avoid taxes. You will be taxed on the excess per diem. What you wont get on that money is the 13 percent DC or the ability to contribute some of it to your 401k and fill your 415C limit. Some increase in per diem to the max allowed tax free would be good. That is probably not more then 50 cents an hour more then current. The rest should be in pay.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:31 PM
  #69305  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Exactly. We have to bust the myth that Scope is somehow a seperate or niche issue. Scope is Pay. Scope is Retirement. Scope is Vacation. Scope is simply the jobs that everything else in the contract applies to.
There is a reason that Scope is Section 1 in the PWA.

Compensation is Section 3.

Been that way for awhile.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:33 PM
  #69306  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Raising per diem that much would not be a smart move. There is no real tax advantage once you reach the accepted deductions for transport workers for meal expenses. The IRS is quite wise to move pay into other areas to try and avoid taxes. You will be taxed on the excess per diem. What you wont get on that money is the 13 percent DC or the ability to contribute some of it to your 401k and fill your 415C limit. Some increase in per diem to the max allowed tax free would be good. That is probably not more then 50 cents an hour more then current. The rest should be in pay.

The minimum acceptable in C12K: If its good enough for for the FAA, then its appropriate for us.

Per Diem Rates for domestic.

U.S. Department of State | Welcome to Office of Allowances for international.
TheManager is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:36 PM
  #69307  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
No...he's just being slowplay.

Carl
Holy cow. It took me 17 seconds to look up the data on this very web site. It says $210 but I think the true rate is $212. Are you all such helpless little children you can't do research on your own? No wait, Slowplay didn't spoon feed me information so it must not exist, or he must be trying to fool me. Gaak, what can I do if I am not handed information on a silver platter? I guess I just have to sit in the corner and cry like a baby. GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:40 PM
  #69308  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

must be a slow week at dalpa
scambo1 is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:44 PM
  #69309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyingViking's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B-7ER JFK
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Holy cow. It took me 17 seconds to look up the data on this very web site. It says $210 but I think the true rate is $212. Are you all such helpless little children you can't do research on your own? No wait, Slowplay didn't spoon feed me information so it must not exist, or he must be trying to fool me. Gaak, what can I do if I am not handed information on a silver platter? I guess I just have to sit in the corner and cry like a baby. GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Watch the bloodpressure alfa.....
FlyingViking is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 07:45 PM
  #69310  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

If nothing changes in either contract and AirTran guys get
matched by 2013, every 12 yr captain at SWA will make less (per hour) than a 747 captain at DAL.

HOWEVER

The SWA Captains will make more (per hour)than all the DAL A330, 767-400, 767-300/200 captains.

I think it is fair to say that AirTran guys will be making more than DAL widebody Captains in 2013.

Straight hourly rates, not annual compensation:

DAL payrates eff 01/01/2011
SWA payrates eff 2011??


12yr DAL 747 Captain $217.07
12yr SWA 737 Captain $211.98
12yr DAL 330 Captain $205.04
12yr DAL 767 Captain $181.69
12yr DAL 737 Captain $175.13 (-900)
12yr DAL 737 Captain $174.23 (-800/700)
12yr DAL M88 Captain $161.23


More tidbits:
Reserve guarantee DAL 70 hours
Reserve guarantee SWA 79 hours
Nosmo King is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices