Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2011, 09:36 AM
  #65021  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Bar;

I'm gonna lock you, FTB and Check in $329/night hotel rooms for a week. I'm gonna serve you filets, cracked crab, twinkies and fat tire. Your budget for IT and audiovisual is $10k. Your job is to produce an entertaining video detailing the entire scope bubble for posting on the DALPA website, emailing to DALPA members and posting to youtube. The requirement is to keep the video factual without being boring. There will be no flight pay loss.

Poor form to quote myself, but if ALPA wont put the word out, someone has to.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 09:55 AM
  #65022  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by FlyZ
My question is how do we get the word out? If every DAL poster and the lurkers here influenced ten non-APC types, would that be enough to move scope up the priority list of the majority? I think more and more are becoming aware of it, but is it enough that we can throw back the juicy payrates and scope giveaway we may be handed by ALPA next year?
Well I can tell you that when I walk in the crew room, I would say that at least five pilots are looking at this board.

It is simple. We have trips together that have overnights. Educate yourself, and then talk amongst your crew when you are on the layo.

I have been very encouraged by the pilots I have talked to. All of them see scope as crucial to any long term contractual gains.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 10:41 AM
  #65023  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Lets look at how this announcement reads. Looks like the holding company is determining capacity of its branded operation.....


Republic Airways Cuts Capacity Outlook to Unchanged on Fuel
By Mary Schlangenstein - May 3, 2011 12:35 PM ET



Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (RJET), the operator of Frontier Airlines, slashed capacity growth plans this year to unchanged from an expansion of as much as 5 percent because of surging fuel costs.


The company, which also flies regional routes for larger carriers, is working to reduce Frontier expenses by $100 million to have “a sustainable business model,” Chief Executive Officer Bryan Bedford said on a conference call today.

“It’s an aggressive plan and we’ve got to get the rest of the way there,” he said. “It’s certainly necessary work to ensure we have a viable and sustainable franchise.”

Republic, based in Indianapolis, joins four of the five biggest U.S. carriers in trimming growth plans for the year in response to a 32 percent rise in fuel prices since the end of 2010. U.S. carriers also have boosted fares to help offset the increased costs.

Republic fell 8 cents, or 1.5 percent, to $5.27 at 12:34 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares declined 27 percent this year before today.

The company bought Frontier out of bankruptcy in 2009 shortly after acquiring Midwest Air Group Inc. The Frontier purchase added a new business to its traditional operation of ferrying passengers to hub airports for carriers such as Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) and United Continental Holdings Inc.

“Over the next few months we’ll be engaging all of our business partners to achieve meaningful expense savings,” Bedford said.
Quarterly Loss

Republic today also reported a first-quarter loss excluding some items of $18.6 million, or 39 cents a share. That was wider than the 36-cent average of seven analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Sales rose 8.3 percent to $659.1 million.

Republic said rising jet-fuel prices will add about $90 million to its costs this year, and forecast a second- quarter loss. The average of seven analysts’ estimates was for an adjusted profit of 29 cents.

Republic is moving six Embraer E170 aircraft to flying for Delta, joining eight of the planes already at the bigger carrier. Republic wants to move three remaining E170s into fixed-fee service by the end of this year, Bedford said.

A disruption of supplies from Japan has caused a two-month delay in planned deliveries to Frontier of six new Embraer E190s to fill the void, he said. The airline now expects to have three to four of the planes flying in 2011.

To contact the reporter on this story: Mary Schlangenstein in Dallas at [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ed Dufner at [email protected]
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 10:43 AM
  #65024  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Interesting.....

Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV)’s new acquisition, AirTran, initially will retain practices such as bag fees and seat assignments that have been shunned at the largest discount carrier.

Southwest got an initial look at proprietary AirTran data today when it closed the $1 billion purchase of the smaller airline and is deferring any shift in operations pending a more- thorough review, Chief Executive Officer Gary Kelly said.

“Today’s the beginning,” Kelly said on a flight to Atlanta from Southwest’s Dallas headquarters for a celebration with employees. “We have much we want to learn before we start to make changes. For some months, there won’t be any changes.”

Buying AirTran gives Southwest access to Atlanta, the world’s busiest airport. It also puts Southwest in the position of owning an airline that charges to check luggage and rebook flights, policies for which it has lampooned rivals in television commercials.

“We’re literally on a different system for everything,” said Bob Jordan, the Southwest executive vice president who has been appointed president of Orlando, Florida-based AirTran. “At some point, AirTran’s fees are going to go away.”

Southwest fell 14 cents, or 1.2 percent, to $11.61 at 4:02 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have declined 13 percent since Sept. 27, when Southwest agreed to buy AirTran for $3.75 cash and 0.321 Southwest share for each share of AirTran Holdings Inc. (AAI)
Debt Ratings

Including AirTran debt and capitalized aircraft operating leases, the transaction is valued at about $3.2 billion, the airlines said. Standard & Poor’s cut Southwest’s credit rating today to BBB-, the lowest investment grade, from BBB, citing the assumption of AirTran debt and leases. S&P raised AirTran to BBB- from B-.

Passengers won’t start to see many changes until late 2011 or early 2012, according to Southwest. The airlines expect to receive regulatory approval to operate as one carrier early in 2012, and the most substantive changes will occur after that.

Southwest and AirTran will continue to operate separate flight schedules, reservation systems and websites. AirTran’s planes will retain a first-class section and their current paint scheme.
‘Support That Brand’

“AirTran continues to be a brand, and we will support that brand, just as we support the Southwest brand,” Kelly said.

While Southwest and AirTran have both focused on low fares as central to their appeal to travelers, their approaches differ. Southwest jets have only one class of service, for example, and AirTran has coach and business-class cabins. AirTran also charges extra for seats on the aisle, next to a window or with extra legroom.

Southwest will examine all of AirTran’s operations, learning things such as how the airline operates a hub-and-spoke flight system and its Boeing Co. (BA) 717s. Southwest flies an all Boeing 737 fleet, which it has long described as a pivotal move in holding down maintenance expenses.

Southwest will compete directly in Atlanta with Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL), the world’s second-largest carrier. Delta controls 75 percent of passengers at Atlanta, now the biggest airport for AirTran.

The acquisition also will give Southwest more gates at New York’s LaGuardia and its first service at Washington’s Reagan National. Southwest is the fourth-largest U.S. airline by traffic, after United Continental Holdings Inc., Delta and AMR Corp. (AMR)’s American Airlines.

Buying AirTran will allow Southwest to resume growth in seating capacity for the first time since the end of 2008, and will add about $3 billion a year in revenue.

To contact the reporters on this story: Mary Schlangenstein in Dallas at [email protected]; Mary Jane Credeur in Atlanta at [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ed Dufner at [email protected]
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 10:52 AM
  #65025  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Lets look at how this announcement reads. Looks like the holding company is determining capacity of its branded operation.....
A-freaking-men. RAH was served up on a silver platter imho by the NMB in their single status ruling on 07APR and if we don't do anything about it we're giving a green light to the most blatant scope erosion to date.

If this gets tabled its absolutely egregious action by the group hired to represent us. If, however, they do as they're hinting at and ensure that all holdings companies are now considered STS, then it's... doing what your supposed to do and plugging the holes on a leaky ship called the PWA.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Republic Airways Cuts Capacity Outlook to Unchanged on Fuel
By Mary Schlangenstein - May 3, 2011 12:35 PM ET



Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (RJET), the operator of Frontier Airlines, slashed capacity growth plans this year to unchanged from an expansion of as much as 5 percent because of surging fuel costs.


The company, which also flies regional routes for larger carriers, is working to reduce Frontier expenses by $100 million to have “a sustainable business model,” Chief Executive Officer Bryan Bedford said on a conference call today.

“It’s an aggressive plan and we’ve got to get the rest of the way there,” he said. “It’s certainly necessary work to ensure we have a viable and sustainable franchise.”

Republic, based in Indianapolis, joins four of the five biggest U.S. carriers in trimming growth plans for the year in response to a 32 percent rise in fuel prices since the end of 2010. U.S. carriers also have boosted fares to help offset the increased costs.

Republic fell 8 cents, or 1.5 percent, to $5.27 at 12:34 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares declined 27 percent this year before today.

The company bought Frontier out of bankruptcy in 2009 shortly after acquiring Midwest Air Group Inc. The Frontier purchase added a new business to its traditional operation of ferrying passengers to hub airports for carriers such as Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) and United Continental Holdings Inc.

“Over the next few months we’ll be engaging all of our business partners to achieve meaningful expense savings,” Bedford said.
Quarterly Loss

Republic today also reported a first-quarter loss excluding some items of $18.6 million, or 39 cents a share. That was wider than the 36-cent average of seven analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Sales rose 8.3 percent to $659.1 million.

Republic said rising jet-fuel prices will add about $90 million to its costs this year, and forecast a second- quarter loss. The average of seven analysts’ estimates was for an adjusted profit of 29 cents.

Republic is moving six Embraer E170 aircraft to flying for Delta, joining eight of the planes already at the bigger carrier. Republic wants to move three remaining E170s into fixed-fee service by the end of this year, Bedford said.

A disruption of supplies from Japan has caused a two-month delay in planned deliveries to Frontier of six new Embraer E190s to fill the void, he said. The airline now expects to have three to four of the planes flying in 2011.

To contact the reporter on this story: Mary Schlangenstein in Dallas at [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ed Dufner at [email protected]
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 10:56 AM
  #65026  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
<DISCLAIMER: This is not intended to evolve into a North v. South debate.>

I'm just trying to get my memory straight.

At NWA, does anyone remember Alaska starting a route to one of our hubs (SEA-MSP???) then NWA retaliating by putting a 747-200 on SEA-ANC?

Did that happen, or am I "misremembering" that?
Before the merger, Delta had a limited code share with Alaska, the current expanded code share was inherited from the Northwest contract. That is how Northwest fed their A-330 base in SEA.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 11:01 AM
  #65027  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

From the Atlanta fishwrapper
Reduced options rile some travelers | ajc.com

Reduced options rile some travelers

Southwest’s lack of
business class, assigned seats has fliers on edge.

One of Southwest Airlines’ mantras really bugs business traveler Robert Scott.

“We’re not all things to all people,” Southwest Airlines chief executive Gary Kelly has been known to say.

Scott fears he’s one of the “all people” Kelly means. That’s because when Southwest fully absorbs AirTran, he’ll no longer be able to book the business class seats he loves — at least not on AirTran-turned-Southwest.

As welcome as Southwest’s arrival in Atlanta may be to many fliers, some business fliers such as Scott fear they will face reduced choices. AirTran had a hybrid service model of low fares coupled with mainstream service, including business class and traditional assigned seating. Southwest has neither.

“I’ll miss AirTran a lot,” Scott said. “I liked having an assigned seat and being able to go in business class for not a lot of money.” In the future, he added, “I’ll probably fly Delta a lot more.”

Chris McGinnis, editor of The Ticket newsletter for Atlanta business travelers, said the lack of a business-class seating option is “the biggest obstacle Southwest is going to face in Atlanta ... Everybody’s up in arms over that.”

Southwest spokesman Chris Mainz said AirTran loyalists may not be used to Southwest’s style of operating but may come to like it.

“AirTran has a very loyal following, and they’re used to the services and the style that AirTran operates,” Mainz said. “We strongly feel that once they do experience Southwest service, they’ll come to appreciate it as much as our current loyal business travelers do.”

Southwest executives often point to the airline’s overall success and steady growth in passenger counts as evidence of the wisdom of their approach.

“We’re very confident in our product,” Mainz said. “We encourage and invite them to fly Southwest Airlines, then let them decide if it’s the right choice for them.”

In selling itself to Atlanta Southwest is likely to tout is its lack of checked baggage fees. Yet that won’t benefit business travelers who travel light or got free baggage check due to elite frequent flier status.

Although AirTran started out as a no-frills carrier, over the years it added full-service perks in order to win a chunk of the business travel market, which is typically a big profit center for airlines because such travelers book less-restricted, more expensive fares.

Mainz said Southwest is listening to AirTran business travelers. “We do value their feedback,” he said. Attracting business travelers has been a big focus for Southwest recently, and “any decision that we make, we have the business traveler in mind,” Mainz said.

Kelly, the CEO, has said Southwest arguably carries more business travelers than rivals because of its sheer size as the largest U.S. carrier in the domestic market. He’s also acknowledged the airline loses out on some business travel and wants to change that.

“Whether we’ll get our ‘fair share’ eventually, I don’t know. But we’ve got a long way to go,” he told analysts recently.

McGinnis expects that the removal of AirTran’s business class will lead to some higher first class fares and less room for upgrades on Delta.

Southwest also plans to end AirTran’s assigned seating, further irking some AirTran frequent fliers.

“When you spend your entire life on a plane, you kind of get particular about what you want,” said one, Don Turner. He commutes weekly to California and said he needs a seat with space to be comfortable and to work on the plane.

“I think there are some real 
fans [of Southwest] who are used to getting on the plane in sweatpants and reading a book,” he said. “They’re not 
really expecting to work.”

Southwest is showing more flexibility in other areas with the acquisition. For instance, it has only flown 737s throughout its history, a practice that keeps fleet management simpler and less costly. But it will inherit smaller Boeing 717s in the AirTran deal. It also will take over some of AirTran’s Caribbean routes, which will be its first outside the U.S. And it is taking over a full-blown connecting hub in Atlanta after decades of eschewing the connecting hub model.

Turner and a number of other AirTran business travelers are taking a wait-and-see approach, or planning to fly carriers with a traditional approach.

“I’ve got nothing against [Southwest],” Turner said. “[Southwest] just doesn’t fit my travel requirements.”

Joe Leader organized a “Save our Seats” campaign among AirTran frequent fliers to try to persuade Southwest to keep business class and assigned seats.

“The times I flew Southwest when it was genuinely cattle call, I really disliked it,” said Leader, of Dunwoody, who is president of a trade association. “I’ve heard that it’s gotten better recently. I won’t believe it till I see it.”

Ron DiLeo, executive director of the Association of Corporate Travel Executives, takes a more measured view. “Where I think it will be positive for business travelers is Southwest has a huge network ... It’ll be easier for you to stick to one airline” than it was with AirTran.

Meanwhile, Delta has launched a campaign in Atlanta emphasizing its 70 years as “Atlanta’s hometown airline” — a message that might resonate when it goes up against the mega discounter from Texas. And Delta has been promoting the addition of first-class seats on more planes, including some regional jets.

Alan Bender, a professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, said some businesspeople, such as sales people and entrepreneurs, still will gravitate to Southwest because cost and convenience is more important to them than perks.

“What’s important on a one-hour flight is who has the next flight out,” Bender said.

Terry Sherwin, an insurance broker based in Smyrna, liked getting upgraded to business class on AirTran as an elite frequent flier, but he’s willing to give Southwest a try.

“I’m going to try them first, and if I don’t like them, I’ll probably go back to Delta,” Sherwin said.
Columbia is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 11:09 AM
  #65028  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Before the merger, Delta had a limited code share with Alaska, the current expanded code share was inherited from the Northwest contract. That is how Northwest fed their A-330 base in SEA.
Minneapolis and Atlanta are a long way from Seattle, my friend.
newKnow is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 11:10 AM
  #65029  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by TOGA LK
Buzz, this is real estate that was given up by our illustrious ATL MEC/pro-management team. In the world of land warfare it is exponentially harder to retake turf than to defend it; same principles apply here. While I would like to believe that DAL ALPA may finally get a case of nasty in their soul, management has been awarding long term 70 and 76 seat contracts as fast as they can and right up to the limit. Of course a VP will will make a base tour and tell some sheep that he "hates RJ's," the reality is that a EMB 170-195 nor a CRJ-900 is a RJ. The 737's flown by Alaska aren't RJ's either but the damage is actually much worse. Realistically, it doesn't matter what some VP in a crew lounge states, it's not an official declaration and for all practical purposes he's lying. He probably flies back to ATL and high-fives his buddies," Yeah, I told them I hate RJ's.".

Even if management were to agree on restoring scope, they would caveat it with, "Well we've negotiated ten-year contracts with these carriers and it's economically impossible to buy our way out of these contracts until then." The reality, half the pilots at this airline will more than likely be retired before we could see that reversal come to fruition; it'd be three contracts down the road.

I've run the logic every which way I can, the only two options are the status quo or mergers. The status quo will only lead to more pain (the train wreck that already began long ago).
I think you're spot on here.

Originally Posted by TOGA LK
The problem that needs to be addressed now is the mentality in ATL. Of all people, a pilot in a management position has chosen to reduce the 320 training program to "video professor-style" training. Ive flown with a multitude of great South pilots who really appreciated the 320 training program, referring to it as the old Delta way of doing busines; no more. Destroyed by one of our own, so he can save money in how we train and add the up front monetary savings to his resume. Hopefully, nothing goes wrong, if it does maybe they can pay for the damages out of his paycheck.

Similar in mentality, but an entirely different topic, scope/code shares. Seems like the crud sandwich always starts away from ATL. Management approaches DAL ALPA, requests more scope relief and code shares, ALPA negotiates a win for ATL in some other area (777 deliveries!), every base west of the Mississippi gets hosed.

Sorry, not optimistic in the least bit.
I'm not going to change the construct of your argument, just the target. ATL is mecca, but I don't think DALPA gives it whatever they want. This after all is the base that saw the 764 flying slashed in half and replaced by the 330 which isn't based here. That kind of slashing moves a lot of people down and out of a category. I flew with a lot of 88 Captains last year getting MD'd back to the right seat of whatever. The 320 and 9 are also here doing "ATL" flying and they rightfully probably hate it as MSP, MEM, DTW and CVG are better facilities.

This is also the base where it took a significant acquisition of 90s before they'd allow the 88 pilots to be qualified on it. Had it not been for the surge of 90s only CVG, MSP and probably NYC pilots would fly the quality of trips that comes with the 90 (such as what the SLC pilots had) versus slugging it out in the 88 east of the Mississippi River to those awesome hotspots like the Dayton long and short overnight.

If I was the 88 A I was talking to a week ago I'd tell you about 1996 and who I think DALPA's primary concern is. And that's senior pilots (or at least as senior as the decision makers are at ALPA). If what he talked about was correct (especially when it came to lump sum retirements) then it would similar to what we saw at Continental Express when our ALPA negotiated to end the flow to CAL but guess what, the last qualified person was just junior of the lowest ALPA pilot negotiating the end of the flow. You take care of your own in other words.

Now that might draw the ire of PG or Slow and by all means I just throw it out there for the sake of the dialogue and a retort is always encouraged here. Otherwise, the thread would die. I don't think ATL is the beneficiary of DALPA work but rather its just a pretty big facility, well not pretty, just big. If you saw a 744 base here while there is no 744 flying, that'd be a red flag for sure. But I do think LAX and the west coast don't get what they should get in terms of protection from the detrimental effects of Alaska. Let's hope New's source is right and that's being reviewed. What's good for LAX and SEA is good for ATL, MSP, MEM, NYC, DTW and CVG.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 11:26 AM
  #65030  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Dismayed
Posts: 1,598
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
I have a scheduling question. I am on NOE waiting for my OE, but this month I bid my reserve line and got the 1-13 as X days. Can they schedule me for an OE during my X Days?
Yes, they can. However, if they schedule you over an X day you'll get a PB. For May, they finally got my IOE and TOEs scheduled and looks like they tried very hard to work around my X days, but I ended up getting on PB for the last day on my last scheduled TOE.

Now having said that, the real answer will be something like "it depends". I think they finally realized their scheduling mistakes and are trying to get more of the elephant through the snake.

Good luck, when did you finish training? For reference, I finished mid-Feb.
dragon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices