Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2011, 06:20 AM
  #64941  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
OK... assuming that the manning formula is not a static document:

1) A pilot wants to drop a trip but cannot because of capped reserve days.
2) Pilot puts the trip on the swap board, where it sits..
3) Pilot from another base swoops in and picks up the trip

Repercussions of this exchange:

Because the trip was covered by a different base, it would not go down on the liability side of that bases' ledger to use an accounting motif. When the numbers are crunched, they will see that fewer reserve pilots are required since the trips are being covered. IOW, all that has been done in effect is to shift that flying to another base. I am sure that we are only talking about a little amount of time, but what boils my shrimp is that this proposal does nothing to alleviate the reserve manning issue. WE.. the pilots... help out the issue by allowing trips to be covered by other bases, and skeds has not to get it's hands dirty in the process. If this is to be allowed, we need to bring back true yellow slips without all the days of availability garbage and let a reserve pilot pick up a trip that is either in open time or on the swap board.. within his base.... first.. before any cherry pickers from outside. Then, I might be interested. Until then, the out of base WS/GS process is working fine. This issue here is the reserve system. This does nada to fix it and is little more than diversion from that.
I don't see how it creates any sort of liability in any base. If an ATL guy takes my Kiev trip, and I take his Munich trip, both trips are covered, and no time has shifted between bases. As far as denying good trips to more junior pilots in the same base, I don't think that the senior guys would be dumping their good trips in the absence of a desirable swap.

Does our reserve system need fixing? Probably. Do out-of-base trip swaps have any impact on a pilot on reserve? I don't think so--

Last edited by CVG767A; 05-02-2011 at 03:48 PM.
CVG767A is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 06:44 AM
  #64942  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,989
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
God I love our soldiers!!!!!

Carl

Yep - are Soldiers are the best. But lets not forget our Sailors, as in Navy SEALs!

Scoop

Last edited by Scoop; 05-02-2011 at 07:03 AM.
Scoop is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 06:44 AM
  #64943  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 06:48 AM
  #64944  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingSig
The trip wasn't covered by another base. The trip was owned by a pilot who then chose to give it up. There will be no "numbers crunching" when it comes to this trip in regards to staffing because it started out as a covered trip, the company never got involved with covering the trip, and the trip was flown without a hitch. One pilot was able to get rid of his trip that he didn't want to fly and another pilot was able to pick up more time without regard to the ALV+15. The flying didn't shift bases. It's still the same trip out of the same base. Just because one guy in one seat may be from a different base, he's in that base for that trip.
So then it is your contention that the pilot who dropped the original trip will not pick up anything to fill up his month... Let's say he had a 75 hour month, and dropped a 20 hour trip.. he will be satisfied to finish the month with 55 hours.. got it.. thanks for the clarification.
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 06:53 AM
  #64945  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
I don't see how it creates any sort of liability in any base. If an ATL guy takes my Kiev trip, and I take his Munich trip, both trips are covered, and no time has shifted between bases. As far as denying good trips to more junior pilots in the same base, I don't think that the senior guys would be dumping their good trips in the absence of a desirable swap.

Does our reserve system need fixing? Absolutely. Does out-of-base trip swaps have any impact on a pilot on reserve? I don't think so--
What about trips that are just picked up off of the swap board? You know.. the crap trips that nobody wants? (Except perhaps a reserve pilot who is sitting SC and not flying?) This allows that ATL pilot to fill up his month with no automatic recover of that trip by our base. There is no quid pro quo. I will shut up if they open this to reserves without regard to days of availability.. the old style yellow slips. Other than that, I am gonna make a lot of noise about this, because it is a hose job.

Oh, and I fyp above

And lastly, if you give up your KBP trip for MUC, I am going to personally remove your he-man membership.
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 07:10 AM
  #64946  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid

Bullet catching champion - May 2011.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 07:57 AM
  #64947  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
You forgot about the blonde skeleton in the closet joke.

bin Laden finished second...

I wonder if it would have been more fun to bury him in Antarctica.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 08:03 AM
  #64948  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
What about trips that are just picked up off of the swap board? You know.. the crap trips that nobody wants? (Except perhaps a reserve pilot who is sitting SC and not flying?) This allows that ATL pilot to fill up his month with no automatic recover of that trip by our base. There is no quid pro quo. I will shut up if they open this to reserves without regard to days of availability.. the old style yellow slips. Other than that, I am gonna make a lot of noise about this, because it is a hose job.

Oh, and I fyp above

And lastly, if you give up your KBP trip for MUC, I am going to personally remove your he-man membership.
If a trip is on the swap board as a pickup, I'm guessing that there are not enough reserves available. If a guy sitting SC can pick up the trip, who's going to cover that last-minute sick call? We have SC guys for a reason--

And lastly, KBP is way overrated. Sometimes a guy has to turn his back on the crummy Ukrainian beer and emaciated Kiev women, and go for good beer and healthy German women.

(That being said, I probably won't be able to hold KBP trips this summer!)

CVG767A is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 08:14 AM
  #64949  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

They should've given Osama comcrete shoes and let him go from the USS New York.

Works on so many levels.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-02-2011, 08:30 AM
  #64950  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
If a trip is on the swap board as a pickup, I'm guessing that there are not enough reserves available. If a guy sitting SC can pick up the trip, who's going to cover that last-minute sick call? We have SC guys for a reason--

And lastly, KBP is way overrated. Sometimes a guy has to turn his back on the crummy Ukrainian beer and emaciated Kiev women, and go for good beer and healthy German women.

(That being said, I probably won't be able to hold KBP trips this summer!)

Which is precisely my point that this is a reserve issue. This proposal is a bait and switch from the real problem here. Sure.. it frees up line holders from the shackles of capped reserve days, but does NOTHING for those reserve pilots. It will create stagnation there. When the math is done.. it is bad for reserves, regardless. There are only 7 days where available exceeds required for this month (I know this is a floating target, but I'll bet it won't change much). THIS is the problem that need to be addressed. All this proposal does is shift the coverage from one base to another.

One guy in my crashpad last month was sitting SC and 4 GSs went out. Somebody please 'splain that one to me. He WANTED to fly... So why couldn't he have YS'd one of those trips? I realize that I am talking about two subjects here simultaneously, but the issue is the same.. it is the reserve system. period.

I won't be able to hold KBP again for 10 years... (unless I get displaced)

so waaaaaaaaaaaaaah
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices