Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2011, 12:16 PM
  #57771  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
the question is will its opening mean a draw down in 88 or 73 flying and surpluses there?

now I think it would be a major consideration by most but we do have some that have their heads stuck in their nether regions when it comes to the Airbus. Seen it in the crewroom with such gems as:

Random Captain: "What are you doing here?"
ALPA Rep: "Listening tour. Anything you want us to work on?"
Random Captain: "Yeah, get rid of the Airbuses."

or

Loud know it all to buddy but for everyone to hear: "Yeah the dirty secret about that UsAir flight that landed in the Hudson was that it had FADECs so as soon as one engine shut off the other one went to idle. Thats how its designed."

So what does that mean? There's a chance for a good category seniority on a good plane. My hesitation is being in a new category where 50% is still reserve.

Just to minimize the good seniority on a crappy jet issue, FADEC is a part of every modern jet engine. FADEC is like saying "xerox machine" when you refer to a copier. FADEC, EEC and ECU are completely interchangeable in the jet engine design world, the term used is generally more dependant on the engine manufacturer than the function of the "black box." I should caveat this with many EECs and ECUs do allow for a certain level of manual override and authority.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 12:45 PM
  #57772  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Just to minimize the good seniority on a crappy jet issue, FADEC is a part of every modern jet engine. FADEC is like saying "xerox machine" when you refer to a copier. FADEC, EEC and ECU are completely interchangeable in the jet engine design world, the term used is generally more dependant on the engine manufacturer than the function of the "black box." I should caveat this with many EECs and ECUs do allow for a certain level of manual override and authority.
FTBs post was TIC quoting absurd things heard about Airbii

BTW the 73N EECs are even better, they kick off-line when the PSEU system (that locks the overwing doors) fails... who decided to connect those two systems?

Cheers
George

"Happy to fly *any* plane based in LA"
georgetg is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 01:14 PM
  #57773  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
question, if the ATL 320 base comes true how senior do you think it'd go?


It doesn't pay as much as the 73N, requires a long training period at Natco, and I see many people currently commuting to DTW bidding ATL if it is closer to their home. Same with the A330. A lot of A330 pilots live in FLA and do the one monthly commute to DTW to start and end a 12 day trip. I would think ATL would get very senior on those two planes, with DTW opening up.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 02:06 PM
  #57774  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Just to minimize the good seniority on a crappy jet issue, FADEC is a part of every modern jet engine. FADEC is like saying "xerox machine" when you refer to a copier. FADEC, EEC and ECU are completely interchangeable in the jet engine design world, the term used is generally more dependant on the engine manufacturer than the function of the "black box." I should caveat this with many EECs and ECUs do allow for a certain level of manual override and authority.
The irony is great isn't it?

Maybe the guy is an 88 guy but we know as 88 guys not to throw stones since we do live in a glass house... more like the crystal cathedral... blessed by God.

But he was a Captain so you'd think he'd been around.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 02:19 PM
  #57775  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
The irony is great isn't it?

Maybe the guy is an 88 guy but we know as 88 guys not to throw stones since we do live in a glass house... more like the crystal cathedral... blessed by God.

But he was a Captain so you'd think he'd been around.

I was just adding to the douchification (derivative of the french word for shower) of APC
scambo1 is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 02:24 PM
  #57776  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
the question is will its opening mean a draw down in 88 or 73 flying and surpluses there?

That is the question. My gut is the addition of the 320 will not mean a drawdown of 737 or 88 flying.
Michael70776 is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 02:29 PM
  #57777  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
It doesn't pay as much as the 73N, requires a long training period at Natco, and I see many people currently commuting to DTW bidding ATL if it is closer to their home. Same with the A330. A lot of A330 pilots live in FLA and do the one monthly commute to DTW to start and end a 12 day trip. I would think ATL would get very senior on those two planes, with DTW opening up.
DTW 330 could get more junior... or get more senior... or stay the same with fewer seats. Basically, a crap shoot there.

But I agree ATL will be super senior but it might not be because of FL commuters. I think if ATL 330 opens and the pent up demand following the 7ER transformation and 764 slaughter in Peachtree City and Dallas for a strict international category will attract a lot of seniority to it not to mention 330 guys already on the plane who chase it in either base.

As to commuters, if you live in MCO is it worth it to bid ATL and lose seniority to save an hour on your commute? If you live in JAX, maybe. But if you only do it once and a half times a month, probably not. Being closer helps really only if you're driving and not if you're hell bent on taking the last flight that lands with 30 minutes left before show. Of course there are guys who live in SAV that off mainline commute to 7ER NYC when ATL is a relatively short drive but they could only hold the 88.

I think commuters will go to the path of least resistance to the highest QOL and to me, it's DTW. Put it this way, I know ATL based and ATL residing pilots who are ready to bid off the 737 and go to DTW and fly the 320. Fly 3 5-days a month for 80+ hours beats the snot out of flying every day on reserve on super unproductive trips.

As to the 320, still curious as to whether its replacing mainline equipment in ATL or adding to it and pooping out RJs?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 02:32 PM
  #57778  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Michael70776
That is the question. My gut is the addition of the 320 will not mean a drawdown of 737 or 88 flying.
I have a feeling that's the case. But I bet if it is the base will start very small.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 03:13 PM
  #57779  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I have a feeling that's the case. But I bet if it is the base will start very small.
Look at the amount of flying the 320 and 330 do out of ATL. Go take the time to look at the bid packages, and see how many rotations DH to and from ATL. Take the DH's out and you have ATL rotations.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 03:15 PM
  #57780  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
question, if the ATL 320 base comes true how senior do you think it'd go?
There are a few very senior FO's on the 88 that have stated they would bid the right seat of it, if it arrived. All flew the Fluff (-200) and swore they did would not bid that again, so this gives them an opportunity to do different flying.
acl65pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices