Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2011, 08:36 AM
  #56001  
Everyday is a weekend!
 
UncleSam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seasonal Help
Posts: 317
Default

Originally Posted by jabwmu
Reserve question:

If you are on reserve for 9 days straight they have to give you a 24 hour rest period somewhere within 7 days (overnight or other). Lets say they assign you rest from 10pm to 10pm on the 5th - 6th day.

Are you required to acknowledge anything while on rest? Specifically short call at 6am the day after rest? I know they have to give 10 ours for conversion to short call so think 8am would be the earliest if acknowledged at 10pm the night before.

Also, since you're not on an X day you wouldn't be required to check your schedule after 3pm the day before (in this case while on rest).

Is this right? Thanks.
This is one of those very convoluted situations. Basically, if they put you on "rest" and don't assign anything in advance of starting "rest", they can't assign you anything that begins before the end of "rest" plus 5 hours. They can give you a trip or assign SC before "rest" starts and have the report immediately after the "rest". If they wait to give you an assignment within 9 hours of the end of "rest", then the report/start must be 12 hrs from the time of the assignment.

Several different contract sections control this and the schedulers don't do a very good job of abiding by it because it is confusing. If you are on "rest" and they call you with any assignment, best to wait until near the end of "rest" or after to call and ask what they are doing. Think of "rest" as your last X day and adjust the times according to when your rest ends. If they start talking about "add-on rest", call the ALPA office and ask for someone in scheduling.

This is my understanding of this issue and I am not a contract guru.
UncleSam is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:37 AM
  #56002  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Man that was grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat!
tsquare is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:42 AM
  #56003  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
In all fairness, I commented on the Mod threads on a reported post. I have asked the mods to reaffirm how we moderate reposted articles of political nature. Like I have said, we have previously allowed them until the bashing started. We will see of the consensus has changed.

I can attest to having a WSJ news article (non-opinion piece) removed from this board that was free of commentary. Just saying.

Last edited by GunshipGuy; 01-05-2011 at 08:44 AM. Reason: got my reasons
GunshipGuy is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:50 AM
  #56004  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

I'm finishing 737 training at the end of January. How do I bid febuary?
satchip is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:53 AM
  #56005  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
I'm finishing 737 training at the end of January. How do I bid febuary?

Bid like you normally would bid. They will award a line or shadow line depending on when you are projected on completing IOE.

You will see MMC on your line until that projected date.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:54 AM
  #56006  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default Mod note

Since we all seem to have problems discussing industry pertinent issues without leaning left or right I've deleted anything that brushes the political nature. Articles, posts, quotes, etc are deleted.

Politics stink, so let's talk about other things.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:55 AM
  #56007  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
I can attest to having a WSJ news article (non-opinion piece) removed from this board that was free of commentary. Just saying.
And in fairness to a unbiased opinion, I have requested that all of the mods, admins and owners chime in on the subject. I do know of one mod that removes all political posts, but that is one of 12.

When they get done with their debate, all, none or some of these posts will be removed. (Mine included) Have to admit that I was just trying to make a point prior to my morning coffee. Scheduling called and I had not gone back to sleep.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:57 AM
  #56008  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

As it is Johnso's call he can do what he just did.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 09:16 AM
  #56009  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,017
Default

Originally Posted by contrails
Here's another failure of outsourcing.

A vendor has a plane that's going to fly a leg for Mainline Airways, get to the outstation, and then fly a few legs as Vendor Independent Airlines.

The first leg gets not only fuel to get to the destination, but 45 minutes worth of taxi fuel when it's known to be a 10 minute taxi at the moment, plus fuel for an alternate when it's not needed, plus 30 minutes of holding fuel, plus 20 minutes of contingency fuel.

It lands as Mainline Express at the outstation with a few thousand pounds above what it needs. Now it's that much closer to being at release fuel for its flight as Vendor Independent Airlines, where it's competing with the parent company that just bought half of the fuel that's in the tank.
Contrails,

I hate outsourcing as much as the next guy (and twice as much as the guy next to him) but wouldn't the aircraft also have the FAR fuel minimums in it when it shows up as a DAL connection flight? Theoretically. unless it was operated under other than part 121, you would think it would all average out in the long run - of course I could be missing something here - only halfway through my first cup of coffee. I guess if they were stingy on contingency fuel there might be a difference over the long run.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 01-05-2011, 09:28 AM
  #56010  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,947
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Contrails,

I hate outsourcing as much as the next guy (and twice as much as the guy next to him) but wouldn't the aircraft also have the FAR fuel minimums in it when it shows up as a DAL connection flight? Theoretically. unless it was operated under other than part 121, you would think it would all average out in the long run - of course I could be missing something here - only halfway through my first cup of coffee. I guess if they were stingy on contingency fuel there might be a difference over the long run.

Scoop
You are correct in that ever jet is going to land with fuel in the tank.

Think about the discretion involved though, as to how much fuel is going to be loaded at departure considering the destination and overall situation.

You could have a day that's 30SM and CLR but a vendor is adding an alternate, holding fuel, lots of taxi fuel, and contingency fuel only to take all of that gas which it knew wouldn't be needed, and burn it on their own flight the next leg.
contrails is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 08:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 01:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 09:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 07:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 05:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices