Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
If you didn't know, we are currently operating under a contract which is basically a BK contract. If we are to help restore this career we need to get a contract better then SWA, not settle for what they have.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not.....regardless SWA's contract is not good enough. We need better, plus you can't just slap SWA's contract on the table and say that's what we want. We are 2 completely different airlines.
If you didn't know, we are currently operating under a contract which is basically a BK contract. If we are to help restore this career we need to get a contract better then SWA, not settle for what they have.
If you didn't know, we are currently operating under a contract which is basically a BK contract. If we are to help restore this career we need to get a contract better then SWA, not settle for what they have.
Just a couple of points....
1) the CAL pre-merger offer to CAL mgt. was roughly 10% MORE than the SWA (incl. 737-800 TA) rates.
2) The UCAL ALPA rate proposal is even more than the pre-merger rate proposal (how much more is unknown to anyone except the JMEC and JNC), plus other gains proposed.
3) CAL has a frozen but still paying AND 12.75% DC
4) UAL has a 16% DC
5) AA has a smaller but working pension AND 11% DC
6) FDX has SOLID pension AND 7% DC
7) AA is on ice, but has new leadership and is trying to find a way to get a deal (they will be forced to come off the 53% increases, but hopefully UCAL will give them a great benchmark to land on top of)
8)FDX is getting ready to start hiring and they are also about to exchange openers at a profitable company....FWIW cargo margins are a lot lower than they used to be, but still pretty solid.
9) Airtran pilots yet another LCC will be brought up to SWA levels.
ANYBODY WHO WANTS "SWA PAY" AT DAL IS SHOOTING WAY WAY WAY TOO LOW.
IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WE WILL BE AIMING AT A REALISTIC OPENER OF SWA +25-30%, 17-20%DC, PLUS OTHER CHANGES FOR THE BETTER!
**IMHO, the UCAL, AT/SWA merger contract, AA contract and FDX contract are all up for renewal and possibly getting signed BEFORE we even exchange openers........
That is why I think that the MEC has not come out with a "target/mission statement of goals for C1012" YET.....
I think they are afraid of not asking for enough at the outset and then getting blamed for being not demanding enough. I'm glad I'm not part of the upcoming MEC, its a real rock and a hard place.
1) the CAL pre-merger offer to CAL mgt. was roughly 10% MORE than the SWA (incl. 737-800 TA) rates.
2) The UCAL ALPA rate proposal is even more than the pre-merger rate proposal (how much more is unknown to anyone except the JMEC and JNC), plus other gains proposed.
3) CAL has a frozen but still paying AND 12.75% DC
4) UAL has a 16% DC
5) AA has a smaller but working pension AND 11% DC
6) FDX has SOLID pension AND 7% DC
7) AA is on ice, but has new leadership and is trying to find a way to get a deal (they will be forced to come off the 53% increases, but hopefully UCAL will give them a great benchmark to land on top of)
8)FDX is getting ready to start hiring and they are also about to exchange openers at a profitable company....FWIW cargo margins are a lot lower than they used to be, but still pretty solid.
9) Airtran pilots yet another LCC will be brought up to SWA levels.
ANYBODY WHO WANTS "SWA PAY" AT DAL IS SHOOTING WAY WAY WAY TOO LOW.
IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WE WILL BE AIMING AT A REALISTIC OPENER OF SWA +25-30%, 17-20%DC, PLUS OTHER CHANGES FOR THE BETTER!
**IMHO, the UCAL, AT/SWA merger contract, AA contract and FDX contract are all up for renewal and possibly getting signed BEFORE we even exchange openers........
That is why I think that the MEC has not come out with a "target/mission statement of goals for C1012" YET.....
I think they are afraid of not asking for enough at the outset and then getting blamed for being not demanding enough. I'm glad I'm not part of the upcoming MEC, its a real rock and a hard place.
7) AA is on ice, but has new leadership and is trying to find a way to get a deal (they will be forced to come off the 53% increases,
ANYBODY WHO WANTS "SWA PAY" AT DAL IS SHOOTING WAY WAY WAY TOO LOW.
IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WE WILL BE AIMING AT A REALISTIC OPENER OF SWA +25-30%, 17-20%DC, PLUS OTHER CHANGES FOR THE BETTER!
SWA's current 12 year Captain rate is $210. Our current 12 year 737 Captain rate is $168. SWA + 30% would yield a rate of $273. It would take a 63% increase to our current 737 Captain rate to bring it up to $273.
Last time I checked, 63 is greater (and some would say "less realistic") than 53. (And just to be clear, I totally agree that this would be an appropriate increase for us.)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Ok. Just checking.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A330 First Officer
Posts: 1,465
And at what payrate? The -400 pays about 13 bucks an hour more.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,240
YEa careful with wanting the -400 and rest of the ERs same cockpit. It would mean less people on reserve because any trained pilot could fly any of those jets. CAL is like this, but they get different pay depending on the jet you fly that trip. Imagine trying to figure out what you'd be getting paid that month, and on reserve do you get 400 or only if you fly the 400 that month?
Not sure I'm following your logic here. If you think +53% is so outrageous that AA "will be forced" to come off of it, then how do you come up with the idea that we should be aiming at a "realistic opener" of SWA +25-30%?
SWA's current 12 year Captain rate is $210. Our current 12 year 737 Captain rate is $168. SWA + 30% would yield a rate of $273. It would take a 63% increase to our current 737 Captain rate to bring it up to $273.
Last time I checked, 63 is greater (and some would say "less realistic") than 53. (And just to be clear, I totally agree that this would be an appropriate increase for us.)
SWA's current 12 year Captain rate is $210. Our current 12 year 737 Captain rate is $168. SWA + 30% would yield a rate of $273. It would take a 63% increase to our current 737 Captain rate to bring it up to $273.
Last time I checked, 63 is greater (and some would say "less realistic") than 53. (And just to be clear, I totally agree that this would be an appropriate increase for us.)
Finally it will be DAL's turn. Provided the others have signed deals that keep raising the bar, it will allow us to reach that beautiful point of "restoration" that so many are aiming for us to achieve (including me, BTW).
Follow my logic now?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post