Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2010, 01:16 PM
  #51941  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by TOGA LK
A brilliant concept and most definitely in-touch with the reality around junior pilots. With just a few hundred retirements per year until the later part of this decade, there will be many guys forced into a reserve life-style in those categories. The realities are, a SLC or LAX type may very well be a reserve on the junior most eqiupment from 2008 until 2016 or even later, depending on the negotiations concerning scope with Alaska and 70+ seat flying conducted by Skywest. (It's obvious in our network where the Trojan Horse was cut loose, the furthest most direction away from mecca.).

Now that I have complained, a possible solution.

If said pilot is living within 180 miles of a Delta pilot base in the junior most category:

Artificially beef up the staffing formulas on the bottom of said categories.

Alternate said pilots between a month of reserve and a month of holding a schedule. No one is punished as the staffing is artificially high to begin with.

or

If a currently commuting pilot maintains a bid prefence under his AE and/or VD indicating ONLY a preference to be based within 180 miles of his home of record AND maintains that top preference until he is awarded a base within 180 miles of his home of record:

a. Positive space to work for shortcall assignments

b. Positive space for the assignment of a trip

c. Paid hotel rooms and perdiem a. and b.

d. An alternating monthly schedule of reserve and block

e. Seat locks will be removed as required to enable the pilot to bid into a base within 180 miles of his home of record, in seniority order

and

For all reserve pilots:

a. 15 days of availability for 75 hour guarantee, based upon average daily credit of 5 hours per day. This can be shifted as low as 13 days for 65 hours of pay enabling the pilots to maintain a line of work outside of flying as a hedge and preparation against future economic downturns and furlough. Such pilots will be permitted to conduct outside flying under part 91, flight instructing, EMS, police, fire, etc. Such pilots must ensure that this time doesn't conflict with FARs.

b. The ability to bid short call RAP periods and/or longcall in seniority order, a maximum of six short calls per month.

c. The option of bidding all shortcalls for the entire month and being awarded the higher of 80 hours, the ALV or the actual hours or days flown based upon all the duty rigs associated with a regular line pilot and five hours per day guarantee.

d. Scheduling will maintain a ratio of long call and shortcall, with a minimum staffing for shortcall.

e. Trips in open time awarded in seniority order. If a pilot has not put a yellow slip request in, then trips for the following day must be offered by scheduling in seniority order, unless the senior pilots has indicated a preference via yellow slip.

f. Eliminate the requirement to check your schedule on a day off. However, a pilot can expect an assignment or RAP as early as 12:00 the first day and a commuting reserve pilot must anticipate a positive space flight to his base of coverage on the first mainline, codeshare or DCI flight available from his home of record.


These concepts would reward those attempting to bid into a base in which they already live within 180 miles of and rectify the pay discrepancies between those stuck each month at 70 hours and those that can hold regular line positions. In effect, everyone would have about the same pay and 15 days per month of obligation. Of course greenslips and working over the ALV with swaps and open time would still be an option.
-------------

Toga;

this matrix didn't get enough attention. I like it a lot.

Especially the positive space and hotel part.

Now if Intl shortcall would be reduced to the point of being able to back to back them.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 01:21 PM
  #51942  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
While I don't doubt you had to wait or were late in ATL, it wasn't b/c of station personnel. The power that be need to get a handle on the poor planning of dep and arr into the "busiest airport in the world!!"
In the words of Ron Burgundy.....agree to disagree.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 01:25 PM
  #51943  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
While I don't doubt you had to wait or were late in ATL, it wasn't b/c of station personnel. The power that be need to get a handle on the poor planning of dep and arr into the "busiest airport in the world!!"
Sinca,

You are taking this personally, huh?
newKnow is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 01:40 PM
  #51944  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brakechatter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
-------------

Toga;

this matrix didn't get enough attention. I like it a lot.

Especially the positive space and hotel part.

Now if Intl shortcall would be reduced to the point of being able to back to back them.
I don't. Guess we negate each other's votes.
brakechatter is online now  
Old 11-08-2010, 01:51 PM
  #51945  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL717A
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by brakechatter
I don't. Guess we negate each other's votes.
Neither do I.

Non revving is already difficult enough, so now we lose more seats to people commuting to short call?
Jughead is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:12 PM
  #51946  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Yes. I call the play the Gold Club Upgrade to First Class. I forgot to tell you guys about the passenger who tried to steal my hat in Boston a few weeks ago. That's kind of how she looked when she was trying to get away with it stuffed inside her purse. Except it was a brisk walk down the concourse, not a full blown run. She obviously knew she couldn't get away.
newKnow is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:31 PM
  #51947  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Look at 737 and 767 in LA (Los Angeles for those of you on the east coast!), you could be living there and not be able to hold a line in either category. Same goes for SEA which just has widebody cats. Now your saying I have to move/change bases/downbid to get this deal? It'll never float.

Fire Away!!

Denny
LAX73NB and SEA7ERB would be included in the deal.
Whatever is the most junior category in every base.

The incentives could even vary by base. Whatever it takes to get people to want to be on reserve at that base. Pay a bit more for NYC for example (because few live there and there are less potential reserves). A bit less for SLC or ATL.

I doubt the idea would fly. Too radical.

ACL is certainly correct. It would tend to make reserve more junior in the upper categories. But so what? People would still bid what they want and want what they bid.

What it does is shift contract negotiation "resources" away from those folks who want to spend our negotiating capital to make reserve more "commutable".
I know I'll draw flak, but in my opinion if you are going to commute you should bid a category where your seniority allows you to have a regular line. The guys who live in base can sit reserve. It is just plain dumb, not to mention inefficient and illogical, to waste our leverage going after contract terms that would allow more guys to live in Wyoming and be bidding reserve in Los Angeles. I'd much rather use that leverage to get better payrates, higher DC contributions and sick rules and all the other stuff we want.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:49 PM
  #51948  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
It is just plain dumb, not to mention inefficient and illogical, to waste our leverage going after contract terms that would allow more guys to live in Wyoming and be bidding reserve in Los Angeles. I'd much rather use that leverage to get better payrates, higher DC contributions and sick rules and all the other stuff we want.
That's why I like my idea, it gives pilots an incentive to live within 1 to 3 hours (driving ACL) of the bases closest to where they actually live. Again, there are probably a few thousand pilots on reserve at this airline, someone has to be on reserve and not everyone can hold a line.

Last edited by TOGA LK; 11-08-2010 at 03:21 PM.
TOGA LK is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:58 PM
  #51949  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
LAX73NB and SEA7ERB would be included in the deal.
Whatever is the most junior category in every base.

The incentives could even vary by base. Whatever it takes to get people to want to be on reserve at that base. Pay a bit more for NYC for example (because few live there and there are less potential reserves). A bit less for SLC or ATL.

I doubt the idea would fly. Too radical.

ACL is certainly correct. It would tend to make reserve more junior in the upper categories. But so what? People would still bid what they want and want what they bid.

What it does is shift contract negotiation "resources" away from those folks who want to spend our negotiating capital to make reserve more "commutable".
I know I'll draw flak, but in my opinion if you are going to commute you should bid a category where your seniority allows you to have a regular line. The guys who live in base can sit reserve. It is just plain dumb, not to mention inefficient and illogical, to waste our leverage going after contract terms that would allow more guys to live in Wyoming and be bidding reserve in Los Angeles. I'd much rather use that leverage to get better payrates, higher DC contributions and sick rules and all the other stuff we want.

Given the possibilities of the NPRM I do not think anyone would want to blow capital on commuting items unless it is something like NWA had. One flight then a PS. Make it a contractual item and not a policy that can be amended without mutual consent.

As you suggest that means that the same jet in different bases would have different rules.

I do not see that flying at all. It actually would make a financial incentive to create less bases because of the cost savings of more jets in a given base, meaning less jets and seats under the better rules. Wanna Ax a few East Coast and West Coast medium sized bases, go forward with this plan.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:58 PM
  #51950  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
-------------

Toga;

this matrix didn't get enough attention. I like it a lot.

Especially the positive space and hotel part.

Now if Intl shortcall would be reduced to the point of being able to back to back them.
Thanks Scambo. It's one possible solution but I have to admit, most of that came from the older NWA contract under TDY, which I used for about a year. I just modified it to apply towards pilots trying to get into a base within a few hours of home.
TOGA LK is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices