Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2010, 06:43 AM
  #50131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
that the DOT will not give them to us?


Delta presents case for London slots to Boston, Miami
October 14, 2010



Delta presented its business case to the U.S. Department of Transportation Thursday that it should be awarded takeoff and landing slots to operate service between London-Heathrow and Boston and Miami.
In a government filing, Delta said it would mount the strongest competitive challenge to American Airlines and British Airways, which are required to divest some Heathrow slots under a joint venture agreement approved earlier this year. Delta would provide a flexible alternative to the American/British Airways alliance for customers in Boston and Miami.
The filing included 93 letters of support, which included endorsements from elected and community officials in Massachusetts and Florida, including the governors of both states, members Congress and the mayors of Boston and Miami, Massport, the Miami-Dade Aviation Department and customers including Fidelity Investments, Travelers Insurance and General Motors.
If approved, Delta will begin the flights in March 2011, and operate twice-daily service between Boston and Heathrow, and daily service between Miami and Heathrow.


What other airlines applied for these routes?
firstmob is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 07:06 AM
  #50132  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by Superdad
I am not necessarily in favor of complete scope restoration. We all know that the money is in the 100 seat jet. We should ensure that DAL pilots fly that airplane, whenever it comes. As far as the 76 seat and below, whats done is done. If we go and make a huge stink during contract talks and try to get THAT flying back as well, management will only laugh their asses off as they sell it back to us knowing full well that they want to get rid of that aircraft when the 100 seater comes.

The cost to regain the 76 and smaller aircraft will be too great and ultimately worthless.
It shouldn't be about seat size scope, it should be about airframe scope. The E-175 and CRJ-900 are flying around with 76 seats in them because that is the scope limit. Both can fly with more seats in them. I've heard the optimal revenue seat arrangement for the CRJ-900 is 82 seats. I'm not sure what the E-175 is, but I'd bet it is more than 76 seats.

Both of those airframes should be at Delta because they will be around for a long time. the cost to regain the E-175's and CRJ-900's would be well worth it IMO. I'll agree with you on the 50-seaters and CRJ-700's, not worth the cost to recapture that flying at this point.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 07:37 AM
  #50133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
There's not very much that I ever imply. I state things exactly as I mean them. We at the majors sold scope due to a few reasons...all of them inexcusable. For that we are half the problem. The other half is the RJ pilots who took the bait to work for food stamp wages and hope they are one of the lucky few to get an ever diminishing slot at the majors.

Carl
I would say the majors should carry about 75% of the blame because you had to know the regionals would fly them at lower rates because part of the savings is coming from those low wages. The wages for the props should have been an indication of where the wages for 50 seat jets would be.

Now the problem is how do you stop the whipsawing because once any regional starts to get a leg up it gets kicked out by someone else and it's not always the other regionals that are doing the kicking. This isn't just a regional problem but an industry one.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:09 AM
  #50134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wingnutdal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 248
Default

I'm sure the fNWA guys remember that the Avros that Mesaba had were grandfathered by tail number. Anything happened to one of them there was no replacement.

Why can't we start to work in a defined number, each a specific ship? As those planes get older they will be replaced, maybe a long way down the road, but they will be. Get it back to any replacement aircraft will not be capable of carrying more than 50 pax.
Wingnutdal is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:15 AM
  #50135  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default oh be still my beating heart...

'Top Gun 2' Being Discussed, Report Says

Published October 15, 2010



Nearly 25 years after Tom Cruise played iconic hero "Maverick" in the action film "Top Gun," Paramount Pictures is in discussions to revive the 80's cult classic, New York Magazine reported Thursday.

Viacom's Paramount Pictures is negotiating with the film's original producer Jerry Bruckheimer and director Tony Scott to work on "Top Gun 2" and members of the original cast will reportedly take part in the project.

Cruise's starring role in the original movie as Pete "Maverick" Mitchell will be much smaller in the sequel -- perhaps as a flight instructor, a source said.

The 27-year-old son of Oracle founder Larry Ellison, avid aviator David Ellison, is thought to be key in securing financing for the film. He has been influential in co-financing many of Paramount’s films -- including "Mission: Impossible 4," which will also star the 48-year-old Cruise.

At the July 22 London premiere of his summer action flick, "Knight & Day," Cruise denied he was involved in "Top Gun 2."

When asked if there was any truth to the rumors that a "Top Gun" sequel was on its way, Cruise immediately dismissed the speculation.

"No," Cruise laughed, without hesitation. "Sorry man."

---
Okay, I'm going to put this idea of Top Gun 2 up there with seeing Faith Hill on Sunday night football intros and just say "no mas, no mas, NO MAS!" You two were both good years ago, we've moved on, don't ruin what was.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:16 AM
  #50136  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
'Top Gun 2' Being Discussed, Report Says
And why????????
tsquare is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:36 AM
  #50137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,037
Default

Iceman better hit the gym if he is going to fit into that fighter. Due to the age of the cast and the risk of broken hips, there will be no volleyball scene either.



Looks like he already started trying to slim down by having a light beer.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:42 AM
  #50138  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

obligatory post, what about Charlie?



And the Tomcat:



^^^^ that's sad ^^^^
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:51 AM
  #50139  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,037
Default

Time has not been kind to either.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:52 AM
  #50140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
interesting, I'd like to hear more about the vote.

btw, Apple closed above $300, 7 years ago it was $20/share.
Analyst says AAPL to $500.
Apple at $500?
Columbia is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices