Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
10-13-2010, 12:24 PM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
interesting, I'd like to hear more about the vote.
btw, Apple closed above $300, 7 years ago it was $20/share.
btw, Apple closed above $300, 7 years ago it was $20/share.
10-13-2010, 12:26 PM
Happy to be here
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
FtB;
You got a message.
You got a message.
10-13-2010, 12:45 PM
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Yep, now that Alfa did said it, Yep Lee won, and now they are voting for VP's.
Many many rounds of voting. Rice dropped out, It was down to three and Lee won in the last round.
I am glad to see new blood at National. There is lots of work to do.
I will be curious to see what the committee reports bring back. (Like compensation)
It will be interesting to see how we move going forward. I suspect the message will change drastically.
Many many rounds of voting. Rice dropped out, It was down to three and Lee won in the last round.
I am glad to see new blood at National. There is lots of work to do.
I will be curious to see what the committee reports bring back. (Like compensation)
It will be interesting to see how we move going forward. I suspect the message will change drastically.
It's a good thing Lee had no plans in running for ALPA prez.
10-13-2010, 12:47 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Yep, now that Alfa did said it, Yep Lee won, and now they are voting for VP's.
Many many rounds of voting. Rice dropped out, It was down to three and Lee won in the last round.
I am glad to see new blood at National. There is lots of work to do.
I will be curious to see what the committee reports bring back. (Like compensation)
It will be interesting to see how we move going forward. I suspect the message will change drastically.
Many many rounds of voting. Rice dropped out, It was down to three and Lee won in the last round.
I am glad to see new blood at National. There is lots of work to do.
I will be curious to see what the committee reports bring back. (Like compensation)
It will be interesting to see how we move going forward. I suspect the message will change drastically.
10-13-2010, 01:09 PM
At home on the maddog!
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
10-13-2010, 01:16 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,325
I agree 100%. He brought that conflict of interest in-house to buy votes. I expect more of the same and worse now that he serves two masters. No reason to expect that duck to start mooing.
10-13-2010, 01:17 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Well, the die is cast. I just hope that he takes Kingsley and Cannoll with him. Afterall, they hitched their stars to his wagon. Now is the time for them to reap the rewards.
10-13-2010, 01:30 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
We should apply for LAX-PVG flights and see how long it will take the DOT to DISAPPROVE our request
10-13-2010, 01:37 PM
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
OK. The man who wrote a lengthy campaign letter and NEVER ONCE MENTIONED SCOPE has just been elected as ALPA's new President.
To the crowd who want to reform ALPA from within...any new thoughts on the subject? Or are we sticking with the vision?
Carl
To the crowd who want to reform ALPA from within...any new thoughts on the subject? Or are we sticking with the vision?
Carl
10-13-2010, 01:38 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 777 Sim Instructor
Posts: 745
Finis,
From what I have read of the proposed rules, my question is this...........What happens if the company decides to have 48 hour layovers instead of 24? My take from reading the proposed rules is that a 48 hour layover would reset your "base" time to where you are laying over and you could now do a 2 man 9 or 10 hour leg each way based on your "local" departure time.
The proposed rules allow 9 hour legs for a "local" base departure between 0500 and 1959 with a 10 hour leg from 0700 to 1259.
Some one please correct me if I'm reading the proposed rules wrong.The following is from the NPRM:
Denny
Edit: You could fly a 9 hour leg over and 10 hour leg back.
From what I have read of the proposed rules, my question is this...........What happens if the company decides to have 48 hour layovers instead of 24? My take from reading the proposed rules is that a 48 hour layover would reset your "base" time to where you are laying over and you could now do a 2 man 9 or 10 hour leg each way based on your "local" departure time.
The proposed rules allow 9 hour legs for a "local" base departure between 0500 and 1959 with a 10 hour leg from 0700 to 1259.
Some one please correct me if I'm reading the proposed rules wrong.The following is from the NPRM:
The FAA proposes to permit a carrier to adjust where the flightcrew member
enters the FDP as an acclimated crew member if the individual has been in a new theater
of operations for 72 hours or has been given at least 36 consecutive hours free from duty.enters the FDP as an acclimated crew member if the individual has been in a new theater
Denny
Edit: You could fly a 9 hour leg over and 10 hour leg back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
