Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
10-13-2010, 10:01 AM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Pilot Negotiator: "I'm confused."
Management: "We know that."
I sure would like to see someone to make one of those with nothing but our conversations on this forum! Just straight copy and paste. Start with SWA buys AAI.
This site will be a big hit as 2012 approaches.
10-13-2010, 10:19 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Posts: 397
6 rounds of roll call voting and no new ALPA prez. Next round Lee Moak wins, Prater was just seen wearing a Moak pin.
10-13-2010, 10:31 AM
Happy to be here
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
If he gave his votes to Lee, Lee would have the votes to win.
10-13-2010, 10:41 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Top
Posts: 472
Would someone mind PMing me the name of the long-layover crew hotel in New Orleans? I'm thinking of doing a weekend there w/my wife.
10-13-2010, 10:56 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
From what I have read of the proposed rules, my question is this...........What happens if the company decides to have 48 hour layovers instead of 24? My take from reading the proposed rules is that a 48 hour layover would reset your "base" time to where you are laying over and you could now do a 2 man 9 or 10 hour leg each way based on your "local" departure time.
The proposed rules allow 9 hour legs for a "local" base departure between 0500 and 1959 with a 10 hour leg from 0700 to 1259.
Some one please correct me if I'm reading the proposed rules wrong.The following is from the NPRM:
The FAA proposes to permit a carrier to adjust where the flightcrew member
enters the FDP as an acclimated crew member if the individual has been in a new theater
of operations for 72 hours or has been given at least 36 consecutive hours free from duty.enters the FDP as an acclimated crew member if the individual has been in a new theater
Denny
Edit: You could fly a 9 hour leg over and 10 hour leg back.
Last edited by Denny Crane; 10-13-2010 at 11:01 AM. Reason: added text
10-13-2010, 10:59 AM
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
The 22.d came out when the AE came out. The Projected Category List and Projected Training List came out on Monday. Check on the Crew Resources & Scheduling page under Category Lists. It's on the far right side about mid way down.
10-13-2010, 11:08 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 134
Thank you johnso, last time I checked was Monday before a trip. I guess they posted it right after I logged off. Fly2002
10-13-2010, 11:11 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,231
10-13-2010, 11:15 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Posts: 397
That is exactly the attitude that has led ALPA down the path it is on now.
The best thing about ALPA is that it is a Democracy, and the worst thing about ALPA is that it is a Democracy. Get off your ass and get involved or at the very least stay informed and provide your input.
10-13-2010, 11:27 AM
Happy to be here
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Finis,
From what I have read of the proposed rules, my question is this...........What happens if the company decides to have 48 hour layovers instead of 24? My take from reading the proposed rules is that a 48 hour layover would reset your "base" time to where you are laying over and you could now do a 2 man 9 or 10 hour leg each way based on your "local" departure time.
The proposed rules allow 9 hour legs for a "local" base departure between 0500 and 1959 with a 10 hour leg from 0700 to 1259.
Some one please correct me if I'm reading the proposed rules wrong.The following is from the NPRM:
Denny
Edit: You could fly a 9 hour leg over and 10 hour leg back.
From what I have read of the proposed rules, my question is this...........What happens if the company decides to have 48 hour layovers instead of 24? My take from reading the proposed rules is that a 48 hour layover would reset your "base" time to where you are laying over and you could now do a 2 man 9 or 10 hour leg each way based on your "local" departure time.
The proposed rules allow 9 hour legs for a "local" base departure between 0500 and 1959 with a 10 hour leg from 0700 to 1259.
Some one please correct me if I'm reading the proposed rules wrong.The following is from the NPRM:
The FAA proposes to permit a carrier to adjust where the flightcrew member
enters the FDP as an acclimated crew member if the individual has been in a new theater
of operations for 72 hours or has been given at least 36 consecutive hours free from duty.enters the FDP as an acclimated crew member if the individual has been in a new theater
Denny
Edit: You could fly a 9 hour leg over and 10 hour leg back.
Luck for us our PWA states that any flight over eight hrs will have a RP.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
