Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2010, 07:36 AM
  #47051  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I had it happen twice Dirty, and I was darn glad I was in position because I would have not made report.

Just sayin....
If it's a weekend I have to go into base. Weekdays there is FedEx/UPS. Not my favorite option, but they've saved my bacon a couple times.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 07:39 AM
  #47052  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by rvr350
Even the very senior check airman i've flown with couldn't tell me where the flying is coming from. FWIW, with the whole system eventually MD90 qualified, They can pull down MSPM88 overnight just as "slowly" as they're building it right now.

I think a good barometer is December, when new hires start to hit the line, and it is also the end of last AE's conversion window. If the reserve coverage situation doesn't improve, i'm outta here!
Anybody know if crew planning could provide the info? Guess I'm just hesitant to bid MSP M88 only to end up on reserve again. If I'm going to be on reserve I might as well jet stay on the 320.

I guess the safe thing to do is protect myself with % qualifiers?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 07:54 AM
  #47053  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,763
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Anybody know if crew planning could provide the info? Guess I'm just hesitant to bid MSP M88 only to end up on reserve again. If I'm going to be on reserve I might as well jet stay on the 320.

I guess the safe thing to do is protect myself with % qualifiers?
I'm not in the know, but I think that these days, anything is possible. Flight Ops leadership does seem to be more proactive about not responding to every twitch from Marketing/network and move the airplanes - I think they got burned on the CVG 7ER and NYC 777 bases. In fact, in the last message from Dickson, he said they were going to hold off on A330 movement until network has a better idea of long term plans for the airplane.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 08:07 AM
  #47054  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

The 787 was originally purchased to do city pairs like IND-FCO, EWR-AMS. Open skies in Asia was also planned on happening. The 787 was/is to do international flights that branched away from the hubs. It's domestic CASM is low enough to do this type of flying. There's more revenue potential in say 36 787s rather than 18 747's.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 08:11 AM
  #47055  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
I'm not in the know, but I think that these days, anything is possible. Flight Ops leadership does seem to be more proactive about not responding to every twitch from Marketing/network and move the airplanes - I think they got burned on the CVG 7ER and NYC 777 bases. In fact, in the last message from Dickson, he said they were going to hold off on A330 movement until network has a better idea of long term plans for the airplane.
Yep network does not like to commit. The trade off is longer trips and more DH's
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 08:45 AM
  #47056  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: west coast wannabe
Posts: 815
Default 68% for me...

Originally Posted by johnso29
Anybody know if crew planning could provide the info? Guess I'm just hesitant to bid MSP M88 only to end up on reserve again. If I'm going to be on reserve I might as well jet stay on the 320.

I guess the safe thing to do is protect myself with % qualifiers?
I think i've put in a 68% qualifiers when i was displaced from SLC, and guess what? I've been on reserve since May! When I inquire crew planning, they said that's where i'm projected to be at the end of the conversion. But by then, new AE would have come out, and it's all a floating number. The only protection we have to holding a line is an increase in flying, which we know is as unpredictable as (add in your funny comments)...

As a commuting reservist, if i were you, i'd hold off on this AE, and see if there's increase in flying in Dec or Jan. i'm staying put at 68%.
rvr350 is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 09:12 AM
  #47057  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
The 787 was originally purchased to do city pairs like IND-FCO, EWR-AMS. Open skies in Asia was also planned on happening. The 787 was/is to do international flights that branched away from the hubs. It's domestic CASM is low enough to do this type of flying. There's more revenue potential in say 36 787s rather than 18 747's.
BUT, there is no 787... delayed AGAIN!

Remember its not all CASM, its RASM-CASM. If the 787s CASM is better than the 747s but it can't carry the cargo, then 747s are the way to go. Especially if you can get good deals on them on the used market. Also, too many planes equals higher CASM in the network/route and then too much capacity brings a lower RASM and you're making less and committed too much. The tight rope between too much and too little has to be managed 26/8, 366.

So,
FLY DELTA JETS!, (the sign is at the ATL TOC)
FLY DC JETS! (the sign is in LGB)
FLY OLD JETS! (the sign is all over the place at a Delta hub )
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 09:17 AM
  #47058  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

FtB;
True, true true.

CASM is very important for downturns and oil spikes. RASM is important for a jets staying power.

I would like to see a 7-9% margin from here on out. That is very possible with jets that can carry the cargo.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 09:20 AM
  #47059  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,913
Default

Heyas,

We've heard all these rumors before. The DC-9-30s still got parked, despite the rumor otherwise, we still don't have E-195s or C-Series at the mainline to replace them. Still no "white tail" 330s, or new whales.

Just a few more aircraft dribbling out of storage. Same old union people who tell us we should be damn happy with what we have, and don't expect much in the future.

God damn it, it's 2010 already. I want my flying car.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 09:25 AM
  #47060  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Heyas,

We've heard all these rumors before. The DC-9-30s still got parked, despite the rumor otherwise, we still don't have E-195s or C-Series at the mainline to replace them. Still no "white tail" 330s, or new whales.

Just a few more aircraft dribbling out of storage. Same old union people who tell us we should be damn happy with what we have, and don't expect much in the future.

God damn it, it's 2010 already. I want my flying car.

Nu
Did you not get you're new car Nu?!?

or was that a DALS only thing?




forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 08:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 01:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 09:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 07:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 05:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices