Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2010, 11:53 AM
  #46051  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jiminmem's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: A320 B Side
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by 1234
FWIW, there are far more times than I can remember where I went down to get a stroller, bag, etc for passengers waiting in the jetway. I have also carried some down prior to departure and have NEVER had any response other than "thanks for the help" from my fellow co-workers (fNWA).
I've also never had an issue helping out with strollers or wheel chairs. I'm not sure if this is a recent change, but I've never heard of this 6 hour pay slip or to not touch a bag.
jiminmem is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 11:58 AM
  #46052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Totally agree that the situation about dragging their heels and taking their time, let alone not doing the job, needs to be fixed pronto.

On the other hand I admire their scope clause... That pay provision in their contract prevents having some of their job duties outsourced to a 3rd party (aka DGS) and provides for a poison pill should that occur. Perhaps we can learn something about scope and contract language.

It's all a matter of how you chose to look at it...

Cheers
George
Scope shouldn't protect people who routinely fail to perform or, more egregious in my book, intentionally don't do their job in attempts to prove a point to the company. I'm all for scope, I'm not for consistent refusal to perform required tasks. I really haven't had many problems at MSP or MEM. My ***** is with what is an obvious work slowdown in DTW. Can you imagine what would happen to pilots or FAs if we routinely chose not to perform our duties? Scope or no scope, we'd be on the street.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:00 PM
  #46053  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by jiminmem
I've also never had an issue helping out with strollers or wheel chairs. I'm not sure if this is a recent change, but I've never heard of this 6 hour pay slip or to not touch a bag.
Ditto, and I'll keep "helping out" where I can especially where I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.

We talked about this same issue several hundred pages ago, and I've been mindful that my help might not be appreciated in some places...YMMV


Cheers
George
georgetg is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:06 PM
  #46054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
Scope shouldn't protect people who routinely fail to perform or, more egregious in my book, intentionally don't do their job in attempts to prove a point to the company. I'm all for scope, I'm not for consistent refusal to perform required tasks. I really haven't had many problems at MSP or MEM. My ***** is with what is an obvious work slowdown in DTW. Can you imagine what would happen to pilots or FAs if we routinely chose not to perform our duties? Scope or no scope, we'd be on the street.
Buzz, you're not getting me.

2 issues:

1) Not doing one's work: unacceptable.

2) Protecting one's work duties from having said duties performed by someone else: scope

The fact that their scope clause happens to also protect them when not doing their job is an unfortunate side effect and I find that sad.

Having contract language defining scope so well it can be used even in situation where people aren't doing their job makes me want to hire their contract writers to work for us...Whoever wrote that clause is good.

Cheers
George
georgetg is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:10 PM
  #46055  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: west coast wannabe
Posts: 815
Default

I'd say we fire all of them, replace them with Mesaba/Skywest/DGS. Heck, even the taxi drivers in MSP works harder than them!
rvr350 is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:11 PM
  #46056  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,218
Default

Originally Posted by Kingbird87
I used to have a document that had everything I needed to reference in my grubby hands, and the other pilot had the same thing. Can that somehow be a bad thing?
Do you really look at the flight plan so much that there needs to be two of them? I don't know what you can be looking at so in depth that one flight plan can't work for both pilots. Especially on a domestic leg.
Xray678 is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:30 PM
  #46057  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL717A
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Do you really look at the flight plan so much that there needs to be two of them? I don't know what you can be looking at so in depth that one flight plan can't work for both pilots. Especially on a domestic leg.
OK I'm glad someone else said this, because I thought the same thing about 700 pages ago when this surfaced as an issue. There it is: the flight plan, neatly folded and tucked on the dashboard, under the rear-view mirror. Weather sheet ripped off and smartly stowed in the fold of the jumpseat. I looked at it for MEL items, entered the flight plan, checked fixes with the FMS, required fuel on board, and perused dispatcher remarks/NOTAMS. What else makes this worthy of two copies? Do we each need our own?

I'm not fNWA...I get that...but what am I missing?
Jughead is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:31 PM
  #46058  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Kingbird87's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330B
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Do you really look at the flight plan so much that there needs to be two of them? I don't know what you can be looking at so in depth that one flight plan can't work for both pilots. Especially on a domestic leg.
No, I don't look at the flight plan that much, it is the Flight Release only that I am talking about. And while marginally adequate to have one, two is optimal. All items regarding routing, MEL's, alternates, Dispatcher and phone numbers, fuel mins were right in my hand, or on the clip on the side window. I think that is a great way to do things. To quote Mr. Lund, the Radio Station owner from 'Oh Brother, Where Art Thou', "I Predict you're gonna enjoy it entirely!"
Kingbird87 is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:36 PM
  #46059  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DAL Pilot
Posts: 1,133
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead
OK I'm glad someone else said this, because I thought the same thing about 700 pages ago when this surfaced as an issue. There it is: the flight plan, neatly folded and tucked on the dashboard, under the rear-view mirror. Weather sheet ripped off and smartly stowed in the fold of the jumpseat. I looked at it for MEL items, entered the flight plan, checked fixes with the FMS, required fuel on board, and perused dispatcher remarks/NOTAMS. What else makes this worthy of two copies? Do we each need our own?

I'm not fNWA...I get that...but what am I missing?
I'm on the same page. I'm sure the way NWA used to do some things would be very useful to us all and I hope they get implemented if they're the best practice. I sure know that Delta does a lot of strange things (having a whole bunch of different manuals is one of those). I don't understand the "two release" thing, though. At my previous airline, we only had one release which we put in the middle console where both pilots could access it. Delta does the same. If I want to look at the release and flight plan, I just grab it and look. Sounds easy enough to me!

That being said... if we do adopt the "two release" fNWA method... I can manage!
Cycle Pilot is offline  
Old 08-25-2010, 12:46 PM
  #46060  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Simple, when a NWA Ramp crew is working your jet do not touch any of the bags or strollers. They get quite upset.

The DAL ramp personnel cannot even tough a bag until they have put in on the ground. Crazy I know.
Not true..... I have removed or carried hundreds of strollers/bags up to folks in the jetway.
NWA320pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices