Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2010, 01:25 PM
  #45591  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
-------
FTB;

Big fan of your posts, but this is a 10 second no vote. Thanks for playing.
But, but, but, but... those are current pay rates, you mean no go on tiers right? Fair enough.
---
Btw, can I post an article from aviation week, which lately resembles a remote control enthusiast magazine, on the latest with our slot swap?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 01:36 PM
  #45592  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
---------------
I could conceivably get on board with Mem9guy's methodology. There is afterall no FAE race anymore. That said though, the 747-400 should be in a league of its own (or should it?). 777, 330, 764, in one lump. Pay rates should be much much higher than FTB's table. And NewK definitely needs a raise.

I am sick of chasing the coin - I get that. Schools suck. I was super happy on the -er, but there is too big of a pay gap between it and the 777 to stay put. Now I'm super happy on the 777 and would happily save the company training costs if it made money and lifestyle sense to not bid off. Do not read this as the 777 needs a paycut.

Any scope concession (short of stapling little jets to the seniority list) is a NO vote for me too...Anyone who bids yes for a scope concession won't get the money either, ask Midwest.

Glad to hear you're clamping down on scope. I do think the 747 should be on its own, and it's not because its Super Premium.

I certainly think MEM9Guy's idea could save the company some $$$$, which they can put directly in our pockets.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 02:07 PM
  #45593  
ATL A320 B
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: No longer MEM or 9, but still a guy.
Posts: 238
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Glad to hear you're clamping down on scope. I do think the 747 should be on its own, and it's not because its Super Premium.

I certainly think MEM9Guy's idea could save the company some $$$$, which they can put directly in our pockets.
I agree that the 747 "should" pay more than the 777, but we already gave that up on our current PWA. Rather than spend negotiating capital on separating them back out, I felt that the 747 as the benchmark for all widebody rates helps to bring all of the others in its category up.
Mem9guy is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 02:23 PM
  #45594  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JABDIP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: bartender
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid


Anybody want to come up with some tiers?

NB and WB's by range then seating? And why do you get paid more for cruising? Huh? Huh? Some of us 5-leggers per day would like to know!?
Us cruisers all put in our time 5 legging it to get to the cruising, kinda like paying your dues.
JABDIP is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 02:38 PM
  #45595  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,858
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
I understand your guys wanting to save some fuel..... I just don't agree that whining about how another pilot operates an aircraft is our place.
Boy, no kidding.

Judging by the level and nature of complaining about this, it looks like they must have run out of short sleeve shirts at the pilot shop.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 02:41 PM
  #45596  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DAL Pilot
Posts: 1,133
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Is single engine taxi really that important to you? I never suggest it. I just do what the captain tells me to. These posts *****ing about the 320 not single engine taxiing are really starting to bother me. SINGLE ENGINE TAXI IS NEVER REQUIRED!!!! It these captains do not want to single engine taxi, that is their right. Most 320 captains never come on this board. *****ing about it on here will not change anything anyway. I'm not going to tell my captain we should single engine taxi because some anonymous poster on a message board told me we should. I know we're not all anonymous as I know a bunch of you, but there are a bunch of you that I still can't put names or faces to.
Last time I checked, these Captains don't own the airplane... Delta does. If Delta is encouraging single engine taxiing and has a safe procedure for accomplishing single engine taxi, then the Captains should be doing it. It's their job and what they're paid to do. It's part of being a professional pilot.
Cycle Pilot is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 02:58 PM
  #45597  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: MadDog FO
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by JABDIP
Us cruisers all put in our time 5 legging it to get to the cruising, kinda like paying your dues.
Nice justification. You should lobby for age 70 next.
opie1 is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 03:00 PM
  #45598  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Mem9guy
I agree that the 747 "should" pay more than the 777, but we already gave that up on our current PWA. Rather than spend negotiating capital on separating them back out, I felt that the 747 as the benchmark for all widebody rates helps to bring all of the others in its category up.

Yes but that is still thinking like it's 1955 in this industry.. Same ol same ol...
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 03:02 PM
  #45599  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Boy, no kidding.

Judging by the level and nature of complaining about this, it looks like they must have run out of short sleeve shirts at the pilot shop.

Nu

I'd hardly call it complaining. Frustrated seeing people **** gas away and run engines that don't need to be turning, yes.

Why so defensive of waste?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 08-19-2010, 03:10 PM
  #45600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by opie1
Nice justification. You should lobby for age 70 next.

Lighten' up Francis. Did you not see the smiley face at the end of his post? If you didn't know, different aircraft have different missions that preclude them from doing 5 legs a day.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices