Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2009, 04:44 PM
  #4551  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,597
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I think the 5 days are a actually a product of pilot group surveys. Many prefer the larger trips in order to minimize their commutes.
Once NWA switches to 1 for 3.5 you will no longer see many if any domestic 5 day trips. It becomes almost impossible for the company to avoid credit time when the trip exceeds 4 days. A typical 3 day trip actually is usually 48 to 50 hours TAFB. A 4 day trip is 72 to 74. A 5 day trip is 94 to 96 hours TAFB or almost double a 3 day trip so the credit really starts to kick in.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 05:16 PM
  #4552  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

We had alot of 5 day trips on the 9 back before 9/11 when our rig was 1:3.5. They always went very senior because of the numbers of commuters.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:48 PM
  #4553  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
You may in fact be correct that we furlough, but what I was hinting at was an early out for some FNWA folks.
So, do you think something that gets added into this furlough ROI matrix is the fear that they furlough and then senior FNWA retire quicker than planned thus negating the cost benefit of the furlough as you would have to bring pilots back sooner than desired?

Plus what about fuel prices finally getting lower by spring or summer?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 08:08 PM
  #4554  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
You may in fact be correct that we furlough, but what I was hinting at was an early out for some FNWA folks.

I'd be surprised if they offer an early out on the FNWA side of things. We will be short before we will be over. Its the DAL side that has the "weight" issue, at least for now. Lets hope that the economy stabilizes and neither side get to heavy! We'll see

Last edited by Superpilot92; 01-31-2009 at 08:33 PM.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 01-31-2009, 10:21 PM
  #4555  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

I agree Super, and its probably a "moo" point to wonder why they haven't furloughed because, well, they just haven't. Period. And if the bookings don't pick up they probably will.

I was just wondering how retirements might play into DAL's furlough thinking. It'd be one thing if DAL's side of the fence had the most senior pilots, but its the side thin on staffing with the most senior pilots.

This is what I'm thinking, we could still have a further SMALL fleet reduction and still not see furloughs pre SOC but at SOC we see furloughs without the economy getting any worse or any more fleet reductions.

I think this because right now I am hearing DAL is planning on surpluses at SOC despite NWA coming in "short". Could be bad sources though. And while they want to offer packages (to off load senior senior pilots) right now they obviously can't, the prime candidates are FNWA. So they have to wait to SOC to see what their staffing is, if its slightly over then see if packages can take care of it.

But why I think they won't furlough with a fleet reduction pre SOC is because it'd be on the DAL side to correct our supluses but what if at SOC you get a bunch of FNWA pilots retiring unexpectedly, then you are short on that side and you have to recall which would probably be before you hit your ROFI (return on furlough investment which we've heard is about 2 years). You're better off waiting till one list, offering packages, calculating and then reacting to your needs at that time than you are to furloughing now.

So, they wait.

And its hard to type when you're bouncing a newborn in your arms.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 02-01-2009 at 06:42 AM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 03:24 AM
  #4556  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I agree Super, and its probably a "moo" point to wonder why they haven't furloughed because, well, they just haven't. Period. And if the bookings don't pick up they probably will.

I was just wondering how retirements might play into DAL's furlough thinking. It'd be one thing if DAL's side of the fence had the most senior pilots, but its the side thin on staffing with the most senior pilots.

This is what I'm thinking, we could still have a further SMALL fleet reduction and still not see furloughs pre SOC but at SOC we see furloughs without the economy getting any worse or any more fleet reductions.

I think this because right now I am hearing DAL is planning on surpluses at SOC despite NWA coming in "short". Could be bad sources though. And while they want to offer packages (to off load senior senior pilots) right now they obviously can't, the prime candidates are FNWA. So they have to wait to SOC to see what their staffing is, if its slightly over then see if packages can take care of it.

But why I think they won't furlough with a fleet reduction pre SOC is because it'd be on the DAL side to correct our supluses but what if at SOC you get a bunch of FNWA pilots retiring unexpectedly, then you are short on that side and you have to recall which would probably be before you hit your ROFI (return on furlough investment which we've heard is about 2 years). You're better off waiting till one list, offering packages, calculating and then reacting then you are to furloughing now.

So, they wait.

And its hard to type when you're bouncing a newborn in your arms.


You have a fairly good grasp of what the issues are surrounding this issue.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 08:48 AM
  #4557  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I agree Super, and its probably a "moo" point to wonder why they haven't furloughed because, well, they just haven't. Period. And if the bookings don't pick up they probably will.

I was just wondering how retirements might play into DAL's furlough thinking. It'd be one thing if DAL's side of the fence had the most senior pilots, but its the side thin on staffing with the most senior pilots.

This is what I'm thinking, we could still have a further SMALL fleet reduction and still not see furloughs pre SOC but at SOC we see furloughs without the economy getting any worse or any more fleet reductions.

I think this because right now I am hearing DAL is planning on surpluses at SOC despite NWA coming in "short". Could be bad sources though. And while they want to offer packages (to off load senior senior pilots) right now they obviously can't, the prime candidates are FNWA. So they have to wait to SOC to see what their staffing is, if its slightly over then see if packages can take care of it.

But why I think they won't furlough with a fleet reduction pre SOC is because it'd be on the DAL side to correct our supluses but what if at SOC you get a bunch of FNWA pilots retiring unexpectedly, then you are short on that side and you have to recall which would probably be before you hit your ROFI (return on furlough investment which we've heard is about 2 years). You're better off waiting till one list, offering packages, calculating and then reacting to your needs at that time than you are to furloughing now.

So, they wait.

And its hard to type when you're bouncing a newborn in your arms.
I think another variable to consider is that furloughing prior to SOC could result in great headaches. If you downsize the MD88 flying for instance, you would furlough DAL pilots. Upon SOC, lets say some of those pilots are senior to FNWA guys. They would need to recall the furloughees and then furlough the NWA guys. You are in essence robbing Peter to pay Paul. By waiting until the SOC you will have a much better picture as to what, if any, retirements will take place and also a furlough will be strictly DOH for the combined list. Much easier to figure out when you have the Compass flow through to deal with.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 09:24 AM
  #4558  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

yes, but you do not have to recall FDL or FNWA guys that were furloughed prior to SOC until there is a need. Even if it is out of order.

My understanding is that is how it is legally looked at.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 09:27 AM
  #4559  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
yes, but you do not have to recall FDL or FNWA guys that were furloughed prior to SOC until there is a need. Even if it is out of order.

My understanding is that is how it is legally looked at.
That could be a real saving grace to some who might otherwise be getting the door. It will be very interesting to see how this is played out.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 02-01-2009, 09:45 AM
  #4560  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

That it will. It is part but not all of the reason that even though we are overstaffed we have not done anything about it.
One of the other aspects is that we will have a lot of training that will need to be done in the next two to three years.
acl65pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices