Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2010, 06:43 PM
  #44661  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
No, not a yellow, because I'll be on call for those days. But you can't put in recovery preferences which, I think, means I can show trips that are open in priority order. I've only been doing the reserve thing for about 7 months now and haven't done it before. Just wondering if it actually works or not, and how it's done if it does.
---------------
Call Nancy on day shift and tell her what you want.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 06:56 PM
  #44662  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Link to WSJ article on JFK:
Delta Air Nears Deal For $1.2B Terminal Overhaul At NY's JFK Airport - WSJ.com
sinca3 is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:05 PM
  #44663  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

$1.2B to just tear down Term 3 and fix up 2?

Why in the hell didn't I take a job driving bull dozers for a living? That seems like where the billions are? I know, there is more to this but how much more really needs to be done? We need ramp space so tear down 3, fix the saucer up and connect to 4.

AND PUT WINDOWS IN THE BUILDING. For the sunbathers. I was walking from 3 to 2 one day and a very attractive girl was sun bathing where those moving sidewalks are. I wanted to take a picture and post it. You guys would've enjoyed it.

Kind of like this but so much better:

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:08 PM
  #44664  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Now that's funny! Well played sir. You are hereby named: "Swiftus Counterpunchus"

Carl
--------------
Carl;

I know we've beaten the flaps to death and realize you are on a fenced aircraft, but I was wondering how the FNW SOP would handle something like this:
YouTube - ‪The greatest movie scene ever? - Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus!‬‎
scambo1 is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:11 PM
  #44665  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

By the way, saw the greatest picture today from a FA, a passenger (not on my flight) who was sitting in a seat with a life jacket on. She thought he had opened one of ours and inflated it. He said no, its his own. He just wanted to be ready, ever since the UsAir in the Hudson river incident. I asked, they were flying somewhere that didn't approach a body of water of any type. As long as the guy isn't nuts, I think its funny.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:14 PM
  #44666  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
Default

Originally Posted by DAL73n
Also, I've been told the 737-700 doesn't make money domestically - we only have it for high altitude (Quito) South America Flying. Remember,without the DC-9, A-319 and 737-700 the smallest a/c on property is the MD-88 - which I believe holds 144? and the -90 which holds 150. Long way from these down to a 76 seat RJ to right size for various markets - SCOPE, SCOPE, SCOPE!!!!!!!!!

I heard the same thing but I think its just BS. Just like management hates RJs (as they order more). They can make money on RJs (including a profit margin for the DCI operator) yet the 737-700 and Airbus lose money. Color me skeptical.

Think about the big picture - Alaska, Airtran, Southwest, Frontier, Jetblu, and others can all make money on '700s and the Airbus, but poor old Delta can't. Really? You guys believe this crap?

Wait a minute, I thought the synergies of the merger would make us unstoppable. I thought being the largest carrier in the world would enable us to lock down a lot of high yield corporate accounts. Yet all these other companies can make money on smaller narrow-bodies and we can't - I don't believe it for a second.

Scoop - Who in a previous life, early in the Dark Ages was known as Scoop the Skeptical.
Scoop is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:38 PM
  #44667  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The CRJ900 is very uncomfortable. The exit seats are the worst. I'm only 5'10 and the seat must be 5 inches from the back of my knees. The headrests don't even stay, they just slide right back down. The tray tables in 1st class unfold out of the armrest, & they're such pieces of crap they droop in your lap like a v so your drink constantly slides to the center and tries to spill. The whole thing reminds me of a tyco toy.
The CRJ900 and 700s are good looking planes and look like a lot of fun to fly. However, as a pax, not crazy about the 700 and I've never flown on the CRJ900 to compare. I just think they're very narrow planes and I think the seat pitch must have shrunk at they installed the FC. And one bathroom on a 70-seater is pushing it, and the FA jump seat making 5 across is chintzy. The airplane seems to be a solid machine but 1x2 seating would be better. Its not a big deal on short flights, but about an hour is all I want on one.

The E-jet felt or is wider and the windows are big and it just had a big jet feel and I liked riding in it a lot. But if we can get 3 MD90s for the price of 1, I can see why we're not making a move to have E190s here.

From a pax standpoint, and comparing coach seats (excluding exit rows), I would take the E-jet or the 2-seat side of the 88 over everything we had in the PMDAL fleet. Sad to say. I'll take the CRJ over a middle seat any day though. Of course I've heard the Bus' are comfortable, I'd like to try one some day.

Did I mention I'm 6'5"? I kind of don't fit in anything we have and I cannot lean my head back in any mainline airplane as the seat backs only come to my shoulders. But thats just my observation and something that is all very low on my complaint totem poll this evening.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:43 PM
  #44668  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
I heard the same thing but I think its just BS. Just like management hates RJs (as they order more). They can make money on RJs (including a profit margin for the DCI operator) yet the 737-700 and Airbus lose money. Color me skeptical.

Think about the big picture - Alaska, Airtran, Southwest, Frontier, Jetblu, and others can all make money on '700s and the Airbus, but poor old Delta can't. Really? You guys believe this crap?

Wait a minute, I thought the synergies of the merger would make us unstoppable. I thought being the largest carrier in the world would enable us to lock down a lot of high yield corporate accounts. Yet all these other companies can make money on smaller narrow-bodies and we can't - I don't believe it for a second.

Scoop - Who in a previous life, early in the Dark Ages was known as Scoop the Skeptical.
Dear Scoop the Skeptical,
I think you missed what was actually said about the profitability of the 737-700 in the fleet. The problem is the 737-700 is not a profitable airplane, which moves it into the same category as the DC9-30, DC9-40, DC9-50, MD88, MD90, 757-200, 757-300, 767-300, 767-400, 777-200, 747-200, 747-400, CRJ200, CRJ900, CRJ700, E145, E175, 737-800, A330, A320, A319.

Those airplanes are evidently all unprofitable as long as we're flying them.



I kid. But actually, its probably more true than we know. If you owned just one of those airplanes you wouldn't probably make a profit, if you owned a fleet of just one of them you'd struggle to remain profitable once you grew to full capacity. As a group they fill a niche and feed each other while we aim to make them as cheap as possible by buying whats the most mission appropriate and cost effective (new 777s or used MD90s). Its a collective, we all need each other really, Carl needs Buzz, Buzz needs Carl, Nu needs Bar, Bar needs Nu, Newk needs nobody, its just a happy place.



Where is 80 btw? Got his ipad and we hear less from him?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:52 PM
  #44669  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Dear Scoop the Skeptical,
I think you missed what was actually said about the profitability of the 737-700 in the fleet. The problem is the 737-700 is not a profitable airplane, which moves it into the same category as the DC9-30, DC9-40, DC9-50, MD88, MD90, 757-200, 757-300, 767-300, 767-400, 777-200, 747-200, 747-400, CRJ200, CRJ900, CRJ700, E145, E175, 737-800, A330, A320, A319.

Those airplanes are evidently all unprofitable as long as we're flying them.



I kid. But actually, its probably more true than we know. If you owned just one of those airplanes you wouldn't probably make a profit, if you owned a fleet of just one of them you'd struggle to remain profitable once you grew to full capacity. As a group they fill a niche and feed each other while we aim to make them as cheap as possible by buying whats the most mission appropriate and cost effective (new 777s or used MD90s). Its a collective, we all need each other really, Carl needs Buzz, Buzz needs Carl, Nu needs Bar, Bar needs Nu, Newk needs nobody, its just a happy place.

Where is 80 btw? Got his ipad and we hear less from him?

I'm here! Still pouting that Carl didn't go all Latin on me.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:54 PM
  #44670  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Carl can you go all latin on 80, stat?

Don't go all medeval, just all latin.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 08-04-2010 at 07:55 PM. Reason: FTB, 4 years of latin because I didn't have to speak it.
forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices