Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2010, 07:45 AM
  #42911  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Heyas NewK,

I think people underestimate the value of the flowdown as furlough prevention.

You're not only paying to train a DAL guy to fly a E175. You force a fully trained captain back to FO, and a fully trained FO out onto the street, wasting 2 full training events in addition to the one you use to get qualified.

Now multiply that by 20 a month.

Now work it in reverse when training starts back up.

You are causing a MAJOR logistical nightmare and training dollar sinkhole for the company..

And that's why it was so effective. A real financial incentive NOT to do it with real dollars attached to it.

Far more incentive than having to poke your on-staff labor attorney and telling him "we're going to furlough...come up with some force majure excuse and make it stick".

If I were a contract operator, no way...NO WAY would I want to be involved with a flow. It's a ticket to bankruptcy, and we've already seen what happened to Mesa.

Nu
I agree. The flow program is very important and a great cushion for us. If we lose it, IMO, the only way to provide furlough protection is if we are flying the 70 seaters. It doesn't have to be all of them. We just need an inroads into the flying again.
newKnow is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 07:48 AM
  #42912  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,902
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Yes, and I agree the flow kept us from a post merger furlough. But Nu, how comfortable should we be flowing down to a NON wholly owned?

I don't know, honest.

Ferd
Hi Ferd,

It's not matter if WE would be comfortable.

Any smart managament wouldn't allow it. You could burn millions in training expenses in a heartbeat. You'd have all your captain seats filled with disgrutled pilots who KNEW how to game the system. Plus you'd **** off all the 23 year old newbies that you hired for peanuts when they saw their quick upgrades disappear.

It'd be UGLY.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 07:55 AM
  #42913  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Yes, and I agree the flow kept us from a post merger furlough. But Nu, how comfortable should we be flowing down to a NON wholly owned?

I don't know, honest.

Ferd
Just a few points:

1) The value of the flow we agreed to has materially changed for the worse. (Think how that effects our PWA language and the protection we had versus what we now have)

2) Just because the flow not is less appealing to some does not mean that you just give it away. It has value, and the value is what we had for it prior to the sale.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 07:57 AM
  #42914  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Nu

Yup it sure would be.

I sure doubt it will happen, (remember "Mainline Creep" from the BK court transcripts) but like NewK says, have us fly the EMB family till something else comes along.

But, how does that happen? We sold the company. But, I keep reading we still own the airplanes?

Interesting for sure.

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 08:02 AM
  #42915  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Just a few points:

2) Just because the flow not is less appealing to some does not mean that you just give it away. It has value, and the value is what we had for it prior to the sale.
Good point. But, are you saying we could get a non wholly owned to accept a flow down without a flow up.........which I doubt Delta would agree to.

It's the "value" that we are giving up that will be dangled. What will be offered?

Don't get me wrong..........no scope deals.

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 08:35 AM
  #42916  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Ferd;
Read the PWA, read the LOA's and realize the the PWA states if the FLOW, not up or down being canceled invokes said trigger and the LOA's state that the flow UP can be canceled and the flow down can remain. Two layers of protection there.

CPS and or Mesaba can cancel their flow up per the LOA's, but to cancel the flow down would require all parties to agree to this. So if they cancel the flow up, it does not mean that the flow down is gone. Degraded, yes, but still there.
The PWA states if the flow, and as I read it, that is up or down. So in effect these regionals have control over the 76 seat setback trigger.

Also of note, I have not seen an 8K on from TSH on the acquisition of CPS. So they probably have a condition of sale in the purchase agreement about this flow. The devil is in the detail, and I would assume that there are quite a few in the ASA as well has the purchase agreements of both of these carriers.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 08:58 AM
  #42917  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Hey Check and FTB,

Which is the expensive side?

Riu Palace or Riu Palace Macao in Punta Cana?

I've looked at both. Palace Macao is a little cheaper right now, but more expensive in Sept. Palace looks nicer to me, with access to the sister resorts. I don't think you get that with Palace Macao.

So which is the nicer of the two? It sounds like Check did one and FTB did the other, so I'm trying to get a review from you both. I'm leaning towards the Riu Palace.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 09:12 AM
  #42918  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Johnso


check your PM's
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 09:27 AM
  #42919  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
NewK

I'll let Bar or ACL chime in, but it sure doesn't like any of us would want to work there.
I would not. But, ACL is absolutely correct. If we all agree to mutually waive a detested the flow, management will respond "fine, it's gone."
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 07-08-2010, 09:33 AM
  #42920  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
. We just need an inroads into the flying again.
Agreed! newKnow
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices