Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
ATL A320 B
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: No longer MEM or 9, but still a guy.
Posts: 238
Now that same website has changed the name of the Captain, and he IS a former DAL pilot. I agree with the others that this is legitimate info, and I can almost certainly guarantee that his beef is due to the terminated pension. This is his way of sticking it to ALPA (at least in his mind), which I'm sure is the source of his angst.
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.
Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
hockeypilot, the reason for my previous request to pull the posts is you had indicated you were not 100% sure AND the Spirit Airlines SCABS, Spirit Airlines Strike listed the names of both pilots, neither of which were former DAL pilots. Thus, based on that, I believed your info to obviously be in error.
Now that same website has changed the name of the Captain, and he IS a former DAL pilot. I agree with the others that this is legitimate info, and I can almost certainly guarantee that his beef is due to the terminated pension. This is his way of sticking it to ALPA (at least in his mind), which I'm sure is the source of his angst.
Now that same website has changed the name of the Captain, and he IS a former DAL pilot. I agree with the others that this is legitimate info, and I can almost certainly guarantee that his beef is due to the terminated pension. This is his way of sticking it to ALPA (at least in his mind), which I'm sure is the source of his angst.
Hockey- This is what I was referencing, the name was originally different, and did not match up with a retired DL pilot.
Now that the spelling has been corrected, I most sincerely apologize for calling you out on this. I was wrong, and I am sorry for what I said.
That being said, that scum sucking scab needs his kneecaps taken out Teamster-style.
The company and the FAA divided your group when they opted to back the check airman of DAL that landed on the wrong runway in ATL in the same time frame that the NWA pilots overflew MSP.
Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.
Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.
Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
Remember that the 188 crew agreed to the revocation so that they could re-certify in 12 months. Look at what has been published and then look at how carefully worded the responses are. I am not going to state which I would have chosen, that is just ignorant.
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
The company and the FAA divided your group when they opted to back the check airman of DAL that landed on the wrong runway in ATL in the same time frame that the NWA pilots overflew MSP.
Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.
Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.
Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,423
The company and the FAA divided your group when they opted to back the check airman of DAL that landed on the wrong runway in ATL in the same time frame that the NWA pilots overflew MSP.
Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.
Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.
Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
You have some really bad facts in your statement.
First the check airman had become sick and was not at the controls. He was in the back of the aircraft. The flight arrived at about 5:30AM trying to expedite the arrival because his condition was getting worse. They were given multiple runway changes in the last 15 minutes including a switch from 27L to 27R at 1500 feet. The taxiway in question had been written up multiple times as appearing to be a runway from the air because of the new LED lighting which appeared white not blue. The reports were spread out over a year. Tower failed to turn on the approach lights or ILS for 27R. There were several violations of procedures on the ATC side.
The final savings grace for the pilots was when the FAA duplicated the approach in the air and also lined up on the taxiway. The incident while serious without question had so many mitigating circumstances the FAA took no certificate action against either pilot. There was also minimal press coverage. The MSP overflight had extreme political and press issues and the FAA took very strong certificate action against both crew members. The issue by the way is still not over and I believe the FO will be back to work. The Captain made a choice to retire so in his case the issue may be over.
Sailing, that about sums it up.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,959
Hockey- This is what I was referencing, the name was originally different, and did not match up with a retired DL pilot.
Now that the spelling has been corrected, I most sincerely apologize for calling you out on this. I was wrong, and I am sorry for what I said.
That being said, that scum sucking scab needs his kneecaps taken out Teamster-style.
Now that the spelling has been corrected, I most sincerely apologize for calling you out on this. I was wrong, and I am sorry for what I said.
That being said, that scum sucking scab needs his kneecaps taken out Teamster-style.
I will say that landing on the taxiway could have happened to anyone based on the environmental factors. I would also argue that it would have been better if there HAD been traffic on the taxiway, as that would have made it easier to see (lights from aircraft) that it was in fact a taxiway.
Needless to say, we all need to say "by the grace of god go I" in both cases and bite thy tongue.
Just my opinion,
Ferd
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post