Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2010, 11:22 AM
  #40581  
ATL A320 B
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: No longer MEM or 9, but still a guy.
Posts: 238
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Now that same website has changed the name of the Captain, and he IS a former DAL pilot. I agree with the others that this is legitimate info, and I can almost certainly guarantee that his beef is due to the terminated pension. This is his way of sticking it to ALPA (at least in his mind), which I'm sure is the source of his angst.
So, how many do we have that are still on the property with this same mindset?
Mem9guy is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:29 AM
  #40582  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
MSP 320A. 1 automated call for IA, and 2 calls from a 404 area code all by 1030am central. Me thinks some locals maybe getting a green slip..
DTW 320B called @ 0305 for an IA 2 day. As usual, they ran out of reserves.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:37 AM
  #40583  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
All;
This type of back and forth of issues that are being dealt with by ALP, D-ALPA, the company and the FAA only serves to divide our group.

I honestly believe that DAL and ALPA will do everything within their power in regard to this issue.
The company and the FAA divided your group when they opted to back the check airman of DAL that landed on the wrong runway in ATL in the same time frame that the NWA pilots overflew MSP.

Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.

Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
all4114all is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:42 AM
  #40584  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
hockeypilot, the reason for my previous request to pull the posts is you had indicated you were not 100% sure AND the Spirit Airlines SCABS, Spirit Airlines Strike listed the names of both pilots, neither of which were former DAL pilots. Thus, based on that, I believed your info to obviously be in error.

Now that same website has changed the name of the Captain, and he IS a former DAL pilot. I agree with the others that this is legitimate info, and I can almost certainly guarantee that his beef is due to the terminated pension. This is his way of sticking it to ALPA (at least in his mind), which I'm sure is the source of his angst.

Hockey- This is what I was referencing, the name was originally different, and did not match up with a retired DL pilot.

Now that the spelling has been corrected, I most sincerely apologize for calling you out on this. I was wrong, and I am sorry for what I said.



That being said, that scum sucking scab needs his kneecaps taken out Teamster-style.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:47 AM
  #40585  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by all4114all
The company and the FAA divided your group when they opted to back the check airman of DAL that landed on the wrong runway in ATL in the same time frame that the NWA pilots overflew MSP.

Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.

Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
Your facts are wrong on what you think occurred. I will not correct them, but some of what you just stated is incorrect. Also, who says the company and alpa did not back the 188 crew? There is little leverage with emergency revocation (of any kind), and then the inability to perform said job.

Remember that the 188 crew agreed to the revocation so that they could re-certify in 12 months. Look at what has been published and then look at how carefully worded the responses are. I am not going to state which I would have chosen, that is just ignorant.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:55 AM
  #40586  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by all4114all
The company and the FAA divided your group when they opted to back the check airman of DAL that landed on the wrong runway in ATL in the same time frame that the NWA pilots overflew MSP.

Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.

Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)
You can thank the media for that response. If 60 minutes did a story about you extorting biscoffs from the flights, you'd be fired.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:57 AM
  #40587  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,423
Default

Originally Posted by all4114all
The company and the FAA divided your group when they opted to back the check airman of DAL that landed on the wrong runway in ATL in the same time frame that the NWA pilots overflew MSP.

Landing on the wrong runway is a (remote) possibility for any pilot, but so is the overfly.

Any pilot or knowledgeable aviation professional, would have gladly picked the MSP EAU tour, if they were sitting in back any day, vs the DAL check airman in control landing on the wrong runway. This is why it does not pass the smell test. (IMHO)

You have some really bad facts in your statement.
First the check airman had become sick and was not at the controls. He was in the back of the aircraft. The flight arrived at about 5:30AM trying to expedite the arrival because his condition was getting worse. They were given multiple runway changes in the last 15 minutes including a switch from 27L to 27R at 1500 feet. The taxiway in question had been written up multiple times as appearing to be a runway from the air because of the new LED lighting which appeared white not blue. The reports were spread out over a year. Tower failed to turn on the approach lights or ILS for 27R. There were several violations of procedures on the ATC side.
The final savings grace for the pilots was when the FAA duplicated the approach in the air and also lined up on the taxiway. The incident while serious without question had so many mitigating circumstances the FAA took no certificate action against either pilot. There was also minimal press coverage. The MSP overflight had extreme political and press issues and the FAA took very strong certificate action against both crew members. The issue by the way is still not over and I believe the FO will be back to work. The Captain made a choice to retire so in his case the issue may be over.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 12:01 PM
  #40588  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Sailing, that about sums it up.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 12:05 PM
  #40589  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,959
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
DTW 320B called @ 0305 for an IA 2 day. As usual, they ran out of reserves.
I got the same call. I didn't really appreciate it given the fact that I just finished a 4-day yesterday. I'm going to have to start turning my phone off at night. 3am phone calls are ridiculous. I think it's worse in DTW than other bases due to the high amount of commuters that won't put green slips in.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Hockey- This is what I was referencing, the name was originally different, and did not match up with a retired DL pilot.

Now that the spelling has been corrected, I most sincerely apologize for calling you out on this. I was wrong, and I am sorry for what I said.



That being said, that scum sucking scab needs his kneecaps taken out Teamster-style.
No big deal. Apology accepted. Like I said, I had some pretty reliable sources. I was confused when no one could find any record of him ever working at Delta. I was never told his name, just that he used to work at Delta so I didn't realize his name was spelled wrong either.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 12:06 PM
  #40590  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I am not going to state which I would have chosen, that is just ignorant.
Exactly, like being asked which is worse.......being hit by a car or drowned.

I will say that landing on the taxiway could have happened to anyone based on the environmental factors. I would also argue that it would have been better if there HAD been traffic on the taxiway, as that would have made it easier to see (lights from aircraft) that it was in fact a taxiway.

Needless to say, we all need to say "by the grace of god go I" in both cases and bite thy tongue.

Just my opinion,
Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices