Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1647259)
Two things that I can think of. First if they DH you back from SAV they have to DH a crew over to cover the return flight. The second thing is would not the rotation you describe pay about 7:15 under the current contract. 5:15 for the leg over and 2 hours on the DH only day?
I agree with your last statement. It would eliminate any issue. 4:30 guarantee for each day will govern. |
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1647265)
How about this scenario under the FAR 117 rules?
Pilot signs in at 1957 for a ATL-PHX-ATL turn, landing back here at 0627. These flights are currently in our Delta timetable: DL 1915 departs ATL 2057 arrives PHX 2200 (3+57 block) DL 1646 departs PHX 2355 arrives ATL 0627 (3+32 block) Total FDP = 10+30 Total block = 7+29 Legal under the old PWA? No - The 12. D. 1. table would limit duty day to approximately 9:30. Legal under FAR 117? It seems so. The good news is it would pay 10:30. The bad news is that seems like a killer trip to me, unless you can really reverse your body clock somehow. I suspect there are many more city pairs that could end up doing this, without calling them SDPs. Am I missing something? |
Do white slips or swap with the pot run first in PCS?
|
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1647286)
It pays 9:00.
4:30 guarantee for each day will govern. |
Originally Posted by daldude
(Post 1647289)
Do white slips or swap with the pot run first in PCS?
|
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1647265)
How about this scenario under the FAR 117 rules?
Pilot signs in at 1957 for a ATL-PHX-ATL turn, landing back here at 0627. These flights are currently in our Delta timetable: DL 1915 departs ATL 2057 arrives PHX 2200 (3+57 block) DL 1646 departs PHX 2355 arrives ATL 0627 (3+32 block) Total FDP = 10+30 Total block = 7+29 Legal under the old PWA? No - The 12. D. 1. table would limit duty day to approximately 9:30. Legal under FAR 117? It seems so. The good news is it would pay 10:30. The bad news is that seems like a killer trip to me, unless you can really reverse your body clock somehow. I suspect there are many more city pairs that could end up doing this, without calling them SDPs. Am I missing something? |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1647291)
I don't think so. There is a 10pm to midnight cutout on the 4:30 per day. This flight would be leaving well beyond that time in the situation you describe.
Did one recently just like this but left before 10 and it paid 9:00. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647009)
Ahhhh the mythical staffing formula. Is that the same one that allows categories to be woefully understaffed year after year?
I don't believe it really exists. It is merely cocaine to placate the masses. (us) Those new CA's with 3 week to 2 month long vacations pretty much LOVE that PWA provision now!! (But yes, the staffing formula is on the very bottom edge of what it takes to truly staff the airline, hence the need to keep improving it!) |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1647168)
Rumor has it that it will be SSP extended to all currently on property and newhires will be interviewed by DL and given a flow position.
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1647306)
Ahhh, yes.. The staffing formula, the one that forced the Company to publish the "mini-emergency AE" a couple months ago for 35 A320 CA's. Then the Company had to convert and park a solid number of those awards because DAL would have violated said formula otherwise..
Those new CA's with 3 week to 2 month long vacations pretty much LOVE that PWA provision now!! (But yes, the staffing formula is on the very bottom edge of what it takes to truly staff the airline, hence the need to keep improving it!) |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1647300)
OK, after 10 you're probably correct. Just don't know.
Did one recently just like this but left before 10 and it paid 9:00. |
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1647265)
How about this scenario under the FAR 117 rules?
Pilot signs in at 1957 for a ATL-PHX-ATL turn, landing back here at 0627. These flights are currently in our Delta timetable: DL 1915 departs ATL 2057 arrives PHX 2200 (3+57 block) DL 1646 departs PHX 2355 arrives ATL 0627 (3+32 block) Total FDP = 10+30 Total block = 7+29 Legal under the old PWA? No - The 12. D. 1. table would limit duty day to approximately 9:30. Legal under FAR 117? It seems so. The good news is it would pay 10:30. The bad news is that seems like a killer trip to me, unless you can really reverse your body clock somehow. I suspect there are many more city pairs that could end up doing this, without calling them SDPs. Am I missing something? The mysterious item in the Chairman's Letter "Adopts FAR FDP limits for actual operations" could be very bad for us. The 12.D.1 table is the reason we don't have CDOs right now. If we change that without some serious limitations we will have a lot more trips like the above. As a RES pilot I have done a CDO here at Delta but it complied with the 12.D.1 table. It wasn't fun but it was legal. It also wasn't practical for the company since the PWA duty limit had us duty in at 0300 to comply with the duty limit. I've said it twice before, CDOs and SDP are two separate things and with the changes to our contract being discussed BOTH would be possible. It's one thing to have a 6 hour break between flights it's entirely another to just fly a 12 hour FDP turn, with no beak, in the middle of the night. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1647312)
I don't see how a broken rotation on a CDO would ever leave before midnight let alone 10 pm.
Maybe it's restricted, but 9E is currently flying plenty of CDOs which depart between 9pm and 10pm. I know because I regularly commute on them. BTW, the vast majority of crews I talk to when stuck in the JS hate them. I honestly didn't get too deep in the conversation because I never thought we'd see them here. |
Maybe we can fly all these CDOs out of Memphis and Louisville.
Carry boxes instead of pax. Is there any money in that? |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1647291)
I don't think so. There is a 10pm to midnight cutout on the 4:30 per day. This flight would be leaving well beyond that time in the situation you describe.
Picked up one of these the other night. 1 leg to layover, DH back the next day. Sign-in 2153 depart 2253. Paid 9:00. So I'm guessing that it made it just under the cutoff of 2200 and that it's based on sign-in, not departure. |
Sky Club.
Anybody else a little ticked off about the new guest policy at SkyClub?
|
Will all these questions a about what is and is not legal be openly addressed by Dalpa?
Or will it be one-sided cherry picking with only best-case scenarios? And when do we get to see the TA?? To a much greater extent than the rushed, inadequate C12...this TA seems, for lack of a better term... off. |
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1647265)
How about this scenario under the FAR 117 rules?
Pilot signs in at 1957 for a ATL-PHX-ATL turn, landing back here at 0627. These flights are currently in our Delta timetable: DL 1915 departs ATL 2057 arrives PHX 2200 (3+57 block) DL 1646 departs PHX 2355 arrives ATL 0627 (3+32 block) Total FDP = 10+30 Total block = 7+29 Legal under the old PWA? No - The 12. D. 1. table would limit duty day to approximately 9:30. Legal under FAR 117? It seems so. The good news is it would pay 10:30. The bad news is that seems like a killer trip to me, unless you can really reverse your body clock somehow. I suspect there are many more city pairs that could end up doing this, without calling them SDPs. Am I missing something? Missing something? Yeah, I think you're missing where you call in fatigued in PHX. :eek: |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647346)
Anybody else a little ticked off about the new guest policy at SkyClub?
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 1647370)
What is the new policy? No backpacks or heelies?
|
Have they announced the time and place for the MEC meeting?
|
Sailing you are correct they do need to cover the next days flight. But I have seen pairings that do dead head home leg. If they are stand up pairings r that negates the 515 we just got
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647379)
When I purchased my membership, you were allowed 2 guests. It was nice to be able to take the spousal unit with me on the rare occasion when we travel anymore. Now, that is not allowed.
|
It's times like these I wish we had the old alpa board back. Guys have good points that get missed by many pilots
|
Originally Posted by ilinipilot
(Post 1647393)
It's times like these I wish we had the old alpa board back. Guys have good points that get missed by many pilots
Especially when something is happening. (like a new TA) |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1647335)
Maybe we can fly all these CDOs out of Memphis and Louisville.
Carry boxes instead of pax. Is there any money in that? wind the clock. |
All right, I've been catching up on the last several pages, and here's my two cents. One, this has to go to MEMRAT. Two, anyone who thinks we're going to get 6 hours rest on a CDO hasn't done them before. The whole point is that it's continuous duty; the company wants these so they can handle late night or early morning IROPs without extra pilots. Do three in a row and you'll be more tired than you ever were doing an all nighter or an international trip. I've done plenty at a regional, and they suck. Plus, this will set up precedent for C2015, and why would we consider concessions like this given the company's financial stability? An absolute no vote, period.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647379)
When I purchased my membership, you were allowed 2 guests. It was nice to be able to take the spousal unit with me on the rare occasion when we travel anymore. Now, that is not allowed.
If it makes you feel any better, the people who pay your bills (read: customers), are also quite upset at this development. Googled this instead of reviewing DeltaNet: Delta SkyClub Access Policy Updated -- No More Guests! - One Mile at a Time Effective immediately, membership price is $695 annually. This Executive Membership will continue to allow two complimentary guests. For those customers who rarely need guest access, an Individual Membership at the current rate of $450 will be introduced Spring 2014. This membership will allow guest access for $29 per visit. |
I cannot believe they are gonna try and shove these CDO's down our throats!
A significant change to our PWA, with no survey or polling. They are just starting to put the spin and sugar coating on this one folks. This is complete BS !!!!! Write your Reps!!!! Dont let the camel's nose under the tent and tell our Reps to stop horse trading during the biggest boom for the airline in decades!!!!! |
Why do you think this sets a bad precedent?
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1646979)
They will be partially pay no credit. A typical standup will have 6 hours pay and credit and 1.5 hours pay no credit. A typical all standup line would work 13 stand ups for 78 hours pay and credit plus 20 hours or so of pay no credit for a total of 98 hours. The pay no credit is a very bad precedent to set and I don't think we should go there. Having said that they will not go junior.
As a longtime in base senior reserve I find the 1.5 pay no credit attractive. I would like to hear your concerns. Thanks |
Originally Posted by fartboxflyer
(Post 1647430)
I cannot believe they are gonna try and shove these CDO's down our throats!
A significant change to our PWA, with no survey or polling. They are just starting to put the spin and sugar coating on this one folks. This is complete BS !!!!! Write your Reps!!!! Dont let the camel's nose under the tent and tell our Reps to stop horse trading during the biggest boom for the airline in decades!!!!! My rep told me they are just responding to guys complaining in the lounge about "unproductive" 30 hr layovers..I told him I'm plenty productive with an IPA and wings at TacoMac in CLT..he wasn't impressed. I get the feeling this is a done deal. Without MEMRAT, they're gonna pretty much guarantee the resurrection of DPA..IMHO. |
Is a same day/next day WS supposed to be a proffer? I just checked my schedule at noon and there's a WS on there for tomorrow. Placed on there at 1100.
|
Exactly!^^^
My rep told me they are just responding to guys complaining in the lounge about "unproductive" 30 hr layovers..I told him I'm plenty productive with an IPA and wings at TacoMac in CLT..he wasn't impressed. I get the feeling this is a done deal. Without MEMRAT, they're gonna pretty much guarantee the resurrection of DPA..IMHO. ^^^^^^^ I agree completely, all this TA does is fix one problem by introducing another problem. A simple survey that asks.... "would you consider CDO's" would be decisive and give direction. The spin of.... "well they will go super senior" can be countered with "ok then it would be free to put an opt-out clause for every pilot that knows better" This is garbage, what are they trying to do here....give DPA the keys on a silver platter? |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1646756)
Given the fact that the current 5:15 DPA does not apply to reserves, I'd say a 5:15 ADG will be a big deal to them by getting them into the next RAW bucket or totally full that much sooner and by having GS/IA trips worth that much more.
Shouldn't we wait for the details on this before we make such an assumption? I fully agree that a 3-hour call back leash would be totally unacceptable -- so much so, in fact, that I have a hard time believing that our reps would have agreed to it. The jury is very much out on that one. The 3 hour leash is the only possible interpretation I can see from the information we've gotten so far. The only other way I can read it is we will have a 13 hour call back leash…and then need 10 hours of rest, making long call effectively 23 hours. But we all know there is NO WAY that is happening. We still need 10 hours prospective rest per the FAR's, so with LC being 13 hours that leaves 3 hours (or less if we were to for some reason agree to it) to call back. It really seems this is what was agreed to. |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 1647456)
Is a same day/next day WS supposed to be a proffer? I just checked my schedule at noon and there's a WS on there for tomorrow. Placed on there at 1100.
|
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1647471)
If it's > 12 hours out it is not a proffer.
|
Originally Posted by Spudhauler
(Post 1647422)
All right, I've been catching up on the last several pages, and here's my two cents. One, this has to go to MEMRAT. Two, anyone who thinks we're going to get 6 hours rest on a CDO hasn't done them before. The whole point is that it's continuous duty; the company wants these so they can handle late night or early morning IROPs without extra pilots. Do three in a row and you'll be more tired than you ever were doing an all nighter or an international trip. I've done plenty at a regional, and they suck. Plus, this will set up precedent for C2015, and why would we consider concessions like this given the company's financial stability? An absolute no vote, period.
True. I've had a lot of experience with these at the regionals. They are completely exhausting and absolutely unsafe. |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1647134)
Well, if the turtle heading starts at altitude, don't forget to do the magic carpet ride :D
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1647335)
Maybe we can fly all these CDOs out of Memphis and Louisville.
Carry boxes instead of pax. Is there any money in that? "There's no money in freight." Tr |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 1647456)
Is a same day/next day WS supposed to be a proffer? I just checked my schedule at noon and there's a WS on there for tomorrow. Placed on there at 1100.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:20 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands