Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
And then there's all those bag fees they've been able to push onto our customers. Way more than what pilots cost. And people are still flying. How is that? Maybe we need a "pilot fee". I don't know... but I think our stance should be that pilot costs are not a variable expense. We cost what we cost, and it's management's job to figure out how to pay for it, just like they figure out how to pay for every other fixed expense.
But no one ever wants to go there...
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 269
Funny thing is that most of the pilots that fall in to the first group, want the pay back. I have not ran in to one 07-08 hire that says they are happy with making 80 something a year.
I will not argue the second.
Actually, many of the workrules we have have been surpassed by those of the Delta Connection counterparts. Our once saving grace is ALV, and the max pickup window. Get rid of that and go to just a random money assignment of block hrs and you would see a workrule section that many regionals easily beat.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 269
Pineapple;
Partially true, but the with the industry consolidation you will see the Lion's share of pricing power among four carriers. All of which will look similar, except for the debt burden of LUV.
Partially true, but the with the industry consolidation you will see the Lion's share of pricing power among four carriers. All of which will look similar, except for the debt burden of LUV.
Not sure what you are trying to find out but here are some good raw numbers. Scroll to the bottom of the page to get the Form41 data.
LINK.
LINK.
Training costs are a corporate cost. That number has been reduced greatly in the last five years.
Payroll taxes will go up as we pay more taxes, and I am sure that corporate will bring that to our attention.
Payroll taxes will go up as we pay more taxes, and I am sure that corporate will bring that to our attention.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
The problem is we are NOT a fixed expense. Because different pilot groups are willing to fly for dramatically different rates. And that will always be the case until we come up with a national pay scale. And THAT will never happen until we provide a safety net for those who demand the national rate, and their company liquidates...
But no one ever wants to go there...
But no one ever wants to go there...
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
We can only hope so. Their product and service is horrible. We have started calling AMS Atlanta East since it seems to be trying to be just like Atlanta. I have waited to be parked for extended periods of time. Waited for ground power, waited up to 45 minutes for wheelchairs and watched the staff abuse our passengers. The switch to KLM there has been a disaster. The only good thing is that management is well aware of it.
sailingfun, not sure where you got this info but I can say it is absolutely not true. Send me a PM if you want the proof.
The problem is we are NOT a fixed expense. Because different pilot groups are willing to fly for dramatically different rates. And that will always be the case until we come up with a national pay scale. And THAT will never happen until we provide a safety net for those who demand the national rate, and their company liquidates...
But no one ever wants to go there...
But no one ever wants to go there...
There have always been pilot groups willing to fly for dramatically different rates. It never required 40%+ pay cuts for the majors before. I don't see anything different now, except that management took advantage of a unique opportunity with the post 9/11 environment. And they took it to us hard. And we let them.
So what do we do now? Are we going to just resign to the idea that our profession will never again provide the standard of living that it historically has? Do we really put that little value on what we do? Are we going to bury our heads in the sand and hope that... somehow... magically... while inflation continues to march on... small incremental increases are going to restore our profession?
I don't pretend to have all the answers. It's certainly not going to be easy. But I don't see how LM's strategy could come anywhere close to achieving restoration. Best I can tell... it doesn't even appear to be the objective.
Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Give or take isn't it roughly $1.6-1.8B a year for all of us?
That's my bet. Anyone in the know what to tell me if that's close? You can divide that by the available seat miles and multiply it by a given distance. Just rough idea.
Use these numbers if anyone has a excel spreadsheet out:
http://www.airlinefinancials.com/upl...AL_Q2_2010.pdf
So, if we cost $1,800,000,000.00 and we have 194,000,000,000 available seat miles. If you divide that out its $0.0093/mile or on a 500 mile trip $4.84. That seems off though. I'm beat, sorry.
The number you come up with is for 1 seat. Assume a 737-800 and you need to mutliply by 160 which yields:
$744 for a 500 mile flight - which seems in the ballpark.
Scoop
Give or take isn't it roughly $1.6-1.8B a year for all of us?
That's my bet. Anyone in the know what to tell me if that's close? You can divide that by the available seat miles and multiply it by a given distance. Just rough idea.
Use these numbers if anyone has a excel spreadsheet out:
http://www.airlinefinancials.com/upl...AL_Q2_2010.pdf
So, if we cost $1,800,000,000.00 and we have 194,000,000,000 available seat miles. If you divide that out its $0.0093/mile or on a 500 mile trip $4.84. That seems off though. I'm beat, sorry.
The number you come up with is for 1 seat. Assume a 737-800 and you need to mutliply by 160 which yields:
$744 for a 500 mile flight - which seems in the ballpark.
Scoop
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post