Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2010, 04:39 PM
  #36481  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by TOGA LK
Having flown with a few S. guys I am convinced that we as a group can move forward to provide the safest operation in the industry. While I absolutely despised our former page long taxi checklist and procedures so anal that it dictated the exact order in which an FMS had to be loaded (yes the dots in SOPA/SMAC represented a particular order), I openly embrace a quieter/safer deck on taxi out. On the other end of the spectrum I sense less SA in a round dial DC-9 with one FDRA bouncing around the cockpit," Hey Bill, what was the airway after FLM?"

There have been some good and not so great changes. Unfortunately for the PMDAL pilots, only fNWA pilots will have had experience with both systems. Succesful integration of best practices will be the result of level-headed fNWA pilots in their presentation and equally open minded PMDAL pilots brushing aside tradition and leaving politics in the employee parking lot. Hopefully these items will be changed to a hybrid of former procedures in the interest of safety down the road; that will be the ultimate signature and trademark of a group of experienced professionals.

Aside from the integration issues I would like to see Delta pull a consistent profit and create a network plan that is the envy of the industry. The past few quarterly statements have been dismal, a reversal in our revenue stream and some movement would get most of the pilots out of the doldrums of the SLI as we would all finally get a glimpse of what hundreds of unpaid hours of transition were for, a better future. Here's to going forward with best practices in the name of safey and attaining profitability.
Outstanding post! I for one don't mind improving our procedures, and am open to different ideas. I just want to be part of the discussion, so that we promote a consensus. This implies time, and open-mindedness.

Essentially, the problem right now is that FNWA guys think they see the better way (I understand why you would), but we haven't had a chance to compare. I guess you can get some of your ways within the Flight Ops structure, but the problem is that 60% of the guys haven't been exposed to what you think the better practices are. The 60% deserve their say, just like the 40% do.

So this is is strictly a chronological issue. The cross-polination occurs first, then we debate, then we agree, then we get things changed. It's never been about "sit down and shut-up", it's mostly about giving all pilots a say.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 04:49 PM
  #36482  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
It's never been about "sit down and shut-up", it's ...
That's cause you were never a newhire FO at Natco. They never bothered to explain why because obviously, whevereve else you came from must have been run by morons.

sorry, that was supposed to be funny, probably wasn't however.
TOGA LK is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 04:55 PM
  #36483  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,907
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Nu,

I agree. I think everyone from flight ops to inflight to DALPA is starting to see that 40% is too large to be absorbed and therefore you can't use the old Pan Am playbook.
Heyas Ferd,

I'll leave it to your imagination who's who in this cartoon:

For the record, there is a lot of stuff that I like at DAL as well. It's time to start picking the best stuff...BIG and SMALL.

Nu

NuGuy is online now  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:15 PM
  #36484  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Heyas Ferd,

I'll leave it to your imagination who's who in this cartoon:

For the record, there is a lot of stuff that I like at DAL as well. It's time to start picking the best stuff...BIG and SMALL.

Nu

Oh fine Nu..........I just spewed coke all over my computer!! That is classic
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:15 PM
  #36485  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
For the record, there is a lot of stuff that I like at DAL as well. It's time to start picking the best stuff...BIG and SMALL.
Agreed. The only question is who makes the choice.

I submit the lines pilots will be the best judges of what the line pilots want. Therfore, the only way is for pilots to talk this stuff over, agree, and lobby together for the changes they want.

Otherwise, all you're doing is lobbying Flt Ops to pick a winner based on the analysis of the 40%, hoping they rule in your favor. The 60%, meanwhile, will not be part of the discussion.

The only way you respect everyone's opinion is to involve everyone. I've never flown with a FNWA guy. I don't know how you want to do things, nor do I know why you want them done that way. Because only a very small fraction of us have in fact worked together, I know there is no consensus on Best Practices. There can't possibly be.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:21 PM
  #36486  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Sink,

Good post...........I'm kicking myself for not keeping an old NWA checklist for compare and contrast for my first poor dumb ba$tard pmdal capt that gets stuck with me.

I did, however, print out a world flight release and flight plan......the ACARS you'll have to take our word for

"Fights on Fights on...........no coming out of your block without a tally ho or radar SA on ALL players!! Take it down, push it up.......watch the mach"

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:25 PM
  #36487  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gnewt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 132
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
How long between WWO completion and OE trip?
For me? 2 months!! But then Im kinda special.

Gnewt
Gnewt is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:26 PM
  #36488  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Agreed. The only question is who makes the choice.

I submit the lines pilots will be the best judges of what the line pilots want. Therfore, the only way is for pilots to talk this stuff over, agree, and lobby together for the changes they want.

Otherwise, all you're doing is lobbying Flt Ops to pick a winner based on the analysis of the 40%, hoping they rule in your favor. The 60%, meanwhile, will not be part of the discussion.

The only way you respect everyone's opinion is to involve everyone. I've never flown with a FNWA guy. I don't know how you want to do things, nor do I know why you want them done that way. Because only a very small fraction of us have in fact worked together, I know there is no consensus on Best Practices. There can't possibly be.
Sink,

I agree.........and while I have no vote, my vote would be to wait a bit, let the smoke clear a bit because only then will we get a clear picture on what is good and bad.

Ok, I'm being lazy because I'm too tired to go back and redo everything again. But, I also think I need to get used to what we are doing now so I can give it a fair shake.

For example, I like pushing WITH the load data set. I'm also liking AWABS so far. The flight planning documents and checklists, not so much. But give me a few months.......who knows.

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:36 PM
  #36489  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by Gnewt
For me? 2 months!! But then Im kinda special.

Gnewt
Oh, please, please.....
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:40 PM
  #36490  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
...and while I have no vote, my vote would be to wait a bit, let the smoke clear a bit because only then will we get a clear picture on what is good and bad.
Thanks. The time to discuss this stuff for myself is all I would ask. As I've said before, I'm not married to this stuff. It definitely is up for discussion.

If you look at the tone of the discussion, we're pretty much on the same page in acknowledging there is another way. I don't want to change things just for the hell of it, or because some people are vocal about their prefernces.

I haven't seen a post lately about how you have to accept the way things are "just because". We're all getting used to the fact there actually been, you know, a merger. Nobody thinks you can steamroll 40% of the group, or ignore their wishes.

What I want is good, intelligently run cockpits, and good, intelligent discussions. I don't live my life based on "colors", or "books", and I sure as hell don't want to be labeled in terms of a point on the compass. I want to fly the aircraft as best I can, and then I want to go home. It's that simple.
Sink r8 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices