Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
UAUA pattern bargained off the Delta Dot to set their 777 rates.
Delta's 777 rate of $265 for the B-777 set the bar for the United pilots. The DAL 777 rate was above the United pilots tabled position at the time.
In August 2000, the United pilots negotiators met with the DALPA to determine what our compensations goals were for C2K. The Delta dot 777 rate had set the bar and the United pilots had to exceed it to achieve an industry leading contract, furthermore the United pilots couldn't significantly undershoot DALPA's C2K goals. With the pressure of a possible merger with USAir at the time and the United pilots refusal to fly overtime, United management finally conceded.
Delta's 777 rate of $265 for the B-777 set the bar for the United pilots. The DAL 777 rate was above the United pilots tabled position at the time.
In August 2000, the United pilots negotiators met with the DALPA to determine what our compensations goals were for C2K. The Delta dot 777 rate had set the bar and the United pilots had to exceed it to achieve an industry leading contract, furthermore the United pilots couldn't significantly undershoot DALPA's C2K goals. With the pressure of a possible merger with USAir at the time and the United pilots refusal to fly overtime, United management finally conceded.
If you aren't willing to pull the trigger, the bar will never be moved upwards. Keep that in mind as we approach 2012
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Well, that is pretty depressing. Except the part about the job being enjoyable... I completely agree with you there. I don't agree that the market forces and supply/demand will always work against us. The public doesn't have much of an appetite for aviation disasters with fatalities. If it's true that lower quality pilots impact safety, then it's also true that this will result in fatal accidents (if it hasn't already). That has the potential to affect "market forces" and the market value of pilots considerably. It seems to me that we should do everything we can to positively affect our market value and to enhance aviation safety. I think we have a moral and professional responsibility to do that. Sitting silent or just resigning ourselves to "the inevitable" just doesn't seem right to me.
My CA and I were on this topic the other day. We both feel that the industry's safety record has and continues to hurt our income. Our industry has become so safe that the average passenger has become numb to the fact that they are in a thin metal tube at dangerous altitudes going 500+ MPH. Perhaps if this industry had 3-6 fatal accidents per year we would be paid more?
Last edited by johnso29; 04-25-2010 at 07:03 AM.
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Agreed. I believe the average middle class family makes around 50K. They won't feel sympathy at all.
Johnso, that is and was my point. The ones that know what we are worth are us and the ones we negotiate against. They want us to agree to less than what that number is, and that is logical and we want to get paid more than we are worth. In the end becomes what our worth is.
I would love to march in Parades like the unionists in NYC do, handing out pies to the parade goers, but in our industry the paying public just does not care. 150K for a job not matter what the requirements for entry or to stay in it means little to someone who makes 50K, 100k, 150K, or a million a year. They vote or shop with their dollars. It comes down to capacity and now much we can logically charge for a ticket.
Pattern barging elevates the costs in any industry. It keeps the players in line. Yes, showing the will to strike or striking may get the ball rolling. A resolve of 12200 pilots does that too. Capacity constraint is good for all. More people want to fly with a finite product and a logical increase of that good ensues. Flooding the market with seats from debt burdened companies forces everyone's hand. Why? They need cash flow to pay the mortgage payment.
We have a given a very strong investment in this company. We want a return on that. We expect our Leaders to lead so that gains by labor and management are sustainable. To do that, we need to keep doing what we are doing and holding our leaders accountable. That is the best way to regain what we have lost. The traveling public will adapt if they want the product.
(On a side note, for far to long the air travel to Disney, HI et al was where the discounts were made to let Joe Public and his family take that dream vacation. Hotels etc did not suffer, we did. It is time to change that)
I would love to march in Parades like the unionists in NYC do, handing out pies to the parade goers, but in our industry the paying public just does not care. 150K for a job not matter what the requirements for entry or to stay in it means little to someone who makes 50K, 100k, 150K, or a million a year. They vote or shop with their dollars. It comes down to capacity and now much we can logically charge for a ticket.
Pattern barging elevates the costs in any industry. It keeps the players in line. Yes, showing the will to strike or striking may get the ball rolling. A resolve of 12200 pilots does that too. Capacity constraint is good for all. More people want to fly with a finite product and a logical increase of that good ensues. Flooding the market with seats from debt burdened companies forces everyone's hand. Why? They need cash flow to pay the mortgage payment.
We have a given a very strong investment in this company. We want a return on that. We expect our Leaders to lead so that gains by labor and management are sustainable. To do that, we need to keep doing what we are doing and holding our leaders accountable. That is the best way to regain what we have lost. The traveling public will adapt if they want the product.
(On a side note, for far to long the air travel to Disney, HI et al was where the discounts were made to let Joe Public and his family take that dream vacation. Hotels etc did not suffer, we did. It is time to change that)
Plastic Wings...
...Are Back!
...slow clap Delta, slow freakin clap...
...slow clap Delta, slow freakin clap...
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Thanks for the correctiuon. Had my time line off. Point was pattern bargaining works, and it worked because one airline (NWA) had the gonads to go on strike in 1998.
If you aren't willing to pull the trigger, the bar will never be moved upwards. Keep that in mind as we approach 2012
If you aren't willing to pull the trigger, the bar will never be moved upwards. Keep that in mind as we approach 2012
Please show me an example of a "successful" post deregulation strike against an employer with poor free cash flow. All the strikes that I've researched that "worked" (NWA ALPA, IPA sympathy, Amerijet et. al.) were against companies that were making money. Some other strikes against companies making money only rearranged the deck chairs of the pre-strike offer on the table or not making enough gains above that offer to pay for the time spent out(CMR), so both management and the union "lost".
Strike is a tool, not a strategy. It should be entered into with methodical thought, not just gonads.
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
While your strike was an honorable one, it in my view wasn't the key factor in other airlines achieving pattern gains. The airlines were generating huge free cash from 1996-2000. When there's more pie, there's more for everyone.
Please show me an example of a "successful" post deregulation strike against an employer with poor free cash flow. All the strikes that I've researched that "worked" (NWA ALPA, IPA sympathy, Amerijet et. al.) were against companies that were making money. Some other strikes against companies making money only rearranged the deck chairs of the pre-strike offer on the table or not making enough gains above that offer to pay for the time spent out(CMR), so both management and the union "lost".
Strike is a tool, not a strategy. It should be entered into with methodical thought, not just gonads.
Please show me an example of a "successful" post deregulation strike against an employer with poor free cash flow. All the strikes that I've researched that "worked" (NWA ALPA, IPA sympathy, Amerijet et. al.) were against companies that were making money. Some other strikes against companies making money only rearranged the deck chairs of the pre-strike offer on the table or not making enough gains above that offer to pay for the time spent out(CMR), so both management and the union "lost".
Strike is a tool, not a strategy. It should be entered into with methodical thought, not just gonads.
Not disputing your point slow. I understand what you're saying. Just pointing out how tricky bean counters are.
My CA and I were on this topic the other day. We both feel that the industry's safety record has and continues to hurt our income. Our industry has become so safe that the average passenger has become numb to the fact that they are in a thin metal tube at dangerous altitudes going 500+ MPH. Perhaps if this industry had 3-6 fatal accidents per year we would be paid more?
Woa! Who's gonna volunteer to be the first crew fatality? Anyone?
I like saying that the most dangerous part of my job is driving to work.
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Today I am headed to Mecca for indoc. It is my first trip there. This is my first post here. Trend?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post