Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2010, 06:22 AM
  #35861  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by Reroute
UAUA pattern bargained off the Delta Dot to set their 777 rates.
Delta's 777 rate of $265 for the B-777 set the bar for the United pilots. The DAL 777 rate was above the United pilots tabled position at the time.

In August 2000, the United pilots negotiators met with the DALPA to determine what our compensations goals were for C2K. The Delta dot 777 rate had set the bar and the United pilots had to exceed it to achieve an industry leading contract, furthermore the United pilots couldn't significantly undershoot DALPA's C2K goals. With the pressure of a possible merger with USAir at the time and the United pilots refusal to fly overtime, United management finally conceded.

Thanks for the correctiuon. Had my time line off. Point was pattern bargaining works, and it worked because one airline (NWA) had the gonads to go on strike in 1998.

If you aren't willing to pull the trigger, the bar will never be moved upwards. Keep that in mind as we approach 2012
reddog25 is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 06:22 AM
  #35862  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Well, that is pretty depressing. Except the part about the job being enjoyable... I completely agree with you there. I don't agree that the market forces and supply/demand will always work against us. The public doesn't have much of an appetite for aviation disasters with fatalities. If it's true that lower quality pilots impact safety, then it's also true that this will result in fatal accidents (if it hasn't already). That has the potential to affect "market forces" and the market value of pilots considerably. It seems to me that we should do everything we can to positively affect our market value and to enhance aviation safety. I think we have a moral and professional responsibility to do that. Sitting silent or just resigning ourselves to "the inevitable" just doesn't seem right to me.

My CA and I were on this topic the other day. We both feel that the industry's safety record has and continues to hurt our income. Our industry has become so safe that the average passenger has become numb to the fact that they are in a thin metal tube at dangerous altitudes going 500+ MPH. Perhaps if this industry had 3-6 fatal accidents per year we would be paid more?

Last edited by johnso29; 04-25-2010 at 07:03 AM.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 06:26 AM
  #35863  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
88,

My final point is I agree with you 100%......EXCEPT, the traveling public will never consider current mainline wages ($150k-$200k for Captain) as "grossly underpaid".

They just won't. IMO.
Agreed. I believe the average middle class family makes around 50K. They won't feel sympathy at all.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 06:48 AM
  #35864  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Johnso, that is and was my point. The ones that know what we are worth are us and the ones we negotiate against. They want us to agree to less than what that number is, and that is logical and we want to get paid more than we are worth. In the end becomes what our worth is.

I would love to march in Parades like the unionists in NYC do, handing out pies to the parade goers, but in our industry the paying public just does not care. 150K for a job not matter what the requirements for entry or to stay in it means little to someone who makes 50K, 100k, 150K, or a million a year. They vote or shop with their dollars. It comes down to capacity and now much we can logically charge for a ticket.

Pattern barging elevates the costs in any industry. It keeps the players in line. Yes, showing the will to strike or striking may get the ball rolling. A resolve of 12200 pilots does that too. Capacity constraint is good for all. More people want to fly with a finite product and a logical increase of that good ensues. Flooding the market with seats from debt burdened companies forces everyone's hand. Why? They need cash flow to pay the mortgage payment.

We have a given a very strong investment in this company. We want a return on that. We expect our Leaders to lead so that gains by labor and management are sustainable. To do that, we need to keep doing what we are doing and holding our leaders accountable. That is the best way to regain what we have lost. The traveling public will adapt if they want the product.

(On a side note, for far to long the air travel to Disney, HI et al was where the discounts were made to let Joe Public and his family take that dream vacation. Hotels etc did not suffer, we did. It is time to change that)
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 06:59 AM
  #35865  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyallnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Default Plastic Wings...

...Are Back!

...slow clap Delta, slow freakin clap...
flyallnite is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:01 AM
  #35866  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Thanks for the correctiuon. Had my time line off. Point was pattern bargaining works, and it worked because one airline (NWA) had the gonads to go on strike in 1998.

If you aren't willing to pull the trigger, the bar will never be moved upwards. Keep that in mind as we approach 2012
While your strike was an honorable one, it in my view wasn't the key factor in other airlines achieving pattern gains. The airlines were generating huge free cash from 1996-2000. When there's more pie, there's more for everyone.

Please show me an example of a "successful" post deregulation strike against an employer with poor free cash flow. All the strikes that I've researched that "worked" (NWA ALPA, IPA sympathy, Amerijet et. al.) were against companies that were making money. Some other strikes against companies making money only rearranged the deck chairs of the pre-strike offer on the table or not making enough gains above that offer to pay for the time spent out(CMR), so both management and the union "lost".

Strike is a tool, not a strategy. It should be entered into with methodical thought, not just gonads.
slowplay is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:06 AM
  #35867  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
While your strike was an honorable one, it in my view wasn't the key factor in other airlines achieving pattern gains. The airlines were generating huge free cash from 1996-2000. When there's more pie, there's more for everyone.

Please show me an example of a "successful" post deregulation strike against an employer with poor free cash flow. All the strikes that I've researched that "worked" (NWA ALPA, IPA sympathy, Amerijet et. al.) were against companies that were making money. Some other strikes against companies making money only rearranged the deck chairs of the pre-strike offer on the table or not making enough gains above that offer to pay for the time spent out(CMR), so both management and the union "lost".

Strike is a tool, not a strategy. It should be entered into with methodical thought, not just gonads.
And here we are stacking away cash and paying down debt, yet we are still losing money. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

Not disputing your point slow. I understand what you're saying. Just pointing out how tricky bean counters are.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:10 AM
  #35868  
On Reserve
 
gearsdown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: Motor City Bus Driver
Posts: 22
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
My CA and I were on this topic the other day. We both feel that the industry's safety record has and continues to hurt our income. Our industry has become so safe that the average passenger has become numb to the fact that they are in a thin metal tube at dangerous altitudes going 500+ MPH. Perhaps if this industry had 3-6 fatal accidents per year we would be paid more?

Woa! Who's gonna volunteer to be the first crew fatality? Anyone?

I like saying that the most dangerous part of my job is driving to work.
gearsdown is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:13 AM
  #35869  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by gearsdown
Woa! Who's gonna volunteer to be the first crew fatality? Anyone?

I like saying that the most dangerous part of my job is driving to work.

I knew someone would say it!!!
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:31 AM
  #35870  
Line Holder
 
SFWB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Mecca320B
Posts: 94
Default

Today I am headed to Mecca for indoc. It is my first trip there. This is my first post here. Trend?
SFWB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices