Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thou shalt not post in anger, frustration or ill minded glee that thee will be wielding the words of wisdom that will forever silence someone else... because chances are at 9:30pm and after, it won't happen. ![Cool](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/cool.gif)
Take a break, post tomorrow or take the time to post responses as if the person reading it was a person you really liked and a person that respects you.
I was reading that thread on AA recalls and it makes me glad that, if true, that neither Northwest Airlines or Delta Air Lines would have a system where regional pilots will flow up while furloughed pilots stay furloughed.
![Cool](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/cool.gif)
Take a break, post tomorrow or take the time to post responses as if the person reading it was a person you really liked and a person that respects you.
I was reading that thread on AA recalls and it makes me glad that, if true, that neither Northwest Airlines or Delta Air Lines would have a system where regional pilots will flow up while furloughed pilots stay furloughed.
![Embarrassment](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/redface.gif)
P.S. Because of you guys, I'm going to have to file a tax extension. LOL
![Waves is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rocky,
Have you ever heard the saying watch out what you wish for because you might just get it - well I think it applies here. Let’s do some quick math with very conservative numbers and see what the results are. If you don’t like my assumptions try it with your own.
12,000 Delta Pilots. 75% (conservative number) line-holders results in 9000 line-holders with an average line value of 75 hours a month.
Now lets assume 1/3 of the pilots try the over 80 hour thing and they average 83 hours each.
That’s 3000 pilots averaging 8 hours over the ALV or 24,000 pilot hours.
Divide 24,000 hours by 75 (ALV) and you just surplused 320 DAL pilots. Not to mention a proportionate number going from Captain to FO and from wide-body to narrow-body, line-holder to reserve etc. Maybe the 80+ hour premium pay was one of the factors that resulted in NW running a leaner operation requiring less pilots?
These numbers are notional but I assume the MEC used actual data when they decided on what method of premium pay to go with. Maybe someone (Slowplay or Sailing?) will chime in with a better analysis.
I am not saying that the G/S method is perfect, its not, but there is a reason it was chosen. And the thought of 12000+ pilots trying to fly over 80 hours a month has trouble written all over it -especially for junior guys.
Scoop
PS This was discussed extensively a few thousand posts back.
PPS I am sorry, but I just noticed your analysis of the greenslips which I previously missed. Whatever your succint analysis of greenslips as "stupid" lacks in rigid scientific principals it more than makes up for it in being direct, to the point, and easy to understand.
Have you ever heard the saying watch out what you wish for because you might just get it - well I think it applies here. Let’s do some quick math with very conservative numbers and see what the results are. If you don’t like my assumptions try it with your own.
12,000 Delta Pilots. 75% (conservative number) line-holders results in 9000 line-holders with an average line value of 75 hours a month.
Now lets assume 1/3 of the pilots try the over 80 hour thing and they average 83 hours each.
That’s 3000 pilots averaging 8 hours over the ALV or 24,000 pilot hours.
Divide 24,000 hours by 75 (ALV) and you just surplused 320 DAL pilots. Not to mention a proportionate number going from Captain to FO and from wide-body to narrow-body, line-holder to reserve etc. Maybe the 80+ hour premium pay was one of the factors that resulted in NW running a leaner operation requiring less pilots?
These numbers are notional but I assume the MEC used actual data when they decided on what method of premium pay to go with. Maybe someone (Slowplay or Sailing?) will chime in with a better analysis.
I am not saying that the G/S method is perfect, its not, but there is a reason it was chosen. And the thought of 12000+ pilots trying to fly over 80 hours a month has trouble written all over it -especially for junior guys.
Scoop
PS This was discussed extensively a few thousand posts back.
PPS I am sorry, but I just noticed your analysis of the greenslips which I previously missed. Whatever your succint analysis of greenslips as "stupid" lacks in rigid scientific principals it more than makes up for it in being direct, to the point, and easy to understand.
![maddogmax is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Scoop, like I said in my post and having talked to the folks at the merger committee they did use real numbers to determine which was a better system and it was a wash in actual money paid out from the company to the pilots. The issue became how it was spread out among the pilots. But I am paraphrasing.
The one thing about GS's that will pull your hair out and thats just trying to determine what your monthly pay is to date as you progress through a month where you've earned GS's or having a rolling fart or a real rolling thunder going on. Credit is absolutely confusing imo.
It'd be nice if you could click on a trip in open time on icrew and say "WS" "GS" "YS" instead of writing it down on a piece of paper and inserting it into PCS. Same with figuring out your pay sometimes, you need a pencil and a copy of the contract in hand.
Its tantamount to having to write down trip numbers on a piece of paper so you can insert them into your white slip, you should be able to see "Your Pay in Hours to date is: 34" and
The one thing about GS's that will pull your hair out and thats just trying to determine what your monthly pay is to date as you progress through a month where you've earned GS's or having a rolling fart or a real rolling thunder going on. Credit is absolutely confusing imo.
It'd be nice if you could click on a trip in open time on icrew and say "WS" "GS" "YS" instead of writing it down on a piece of paper and inserting it into PCS. Same with figuring out your pay sometimes, you need a pencil and a copy of the contract in hand.
Its tantamount to having to write down trip numbers on a piece of paper so you can insert them into your white slip, you should be able to see "Your Pay in Hours to date is: 34" and
![forgot to bid is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And fwiw, you can't file us as a tax deduction.
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![forgot to bid is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This maypole has been run around for a long time... probably will be for a lot longer. personally I am past caring about it. We have what we have. I think.. and it is just my opinion... that the way we do it now is better because even the most junior in a given category has a chance of getting a GS. I am not so sure that would be the case with the over 80 hours at 1.5. Besides.. that method really seems like a lot more work would need to be done in order to make some coin. I honestly don't know, and some comparative data would be interesting. Have fun with your discussion.
![Waves is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
![slowplay is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Funny story: When I was a 727 SO, one of the FO's was talking about how he deducted this, and that, and this, and that. The Captain and I were quite surprised at some of the stuff he was deducting and queried him about them. His response was, " Hey, that's what I'm sending in. It's my first offer, if they don't like it, they can just let me know."
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Waves is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,233
![Lifeisgood is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Before 2008 the world was a different ball game. We need to keep that in mind because this is a new world where pre 2001, pre 2005, pre 2008 are gone and nobody will be throwing us a pity party but us.
And, outside of the 982 guys from both sides that were living within 180 miles of the other sides base, I don't know any other pilot in their right mind that would've said in the fall of 2007 "gosh I think I'd like to see us merge with somebody!"
But keep this mind, the powers that be saw that a Delta and Northwest merger was necessary for survival and strength- and imho they were right. The only problem was for DALS is that NWA didn’t have UALs or AMRs base choices and frankly, vice-versa.
Think about everything that happened between 2008 and 2010 and tell me where we would’ve found the money and credit to double our fleet (221% increase for DALN and 183% for DALS), launch majorly into new world theatres and simultaneously pay down debt, beef up the airline (outside of CVG) and save $600M in annual cost?
Look at the competition and you'll see them contemplating starting what we started 2 years ago and they’ve got a lot of roadblocks ahead of them.
We're better off together then alone imho and our two airlines were the best merger option. As T said, its done now. This forum has a way of showing us that not everyone on either side is a homo... homogeneous group. I think honestly, given that we're all operating under the same pwa, DALN and DALS commuters will find a lot in common, DALN and DALS newhires will find a lot in common, old farts will find something in common, regional pilots will find someone else who shares their background and also never buys a round
, LCA will find something in common, those who think supposed Boeing books suck will find things in common, those who hate 23K will find new friends, USAF 20 year guys will find new USAF guys, those who are just haters will find new friends, those have been hypnotized by McDonnell Douglas products will have stuff in common, former Navy pilots who are lucky to still be alive will find others who feel the same, the South America lovers- love on with your new friends, those who like Saipan honkey tonks- you're in luck, and so on.
And, outside of the 982 guys from both sides that were living within 180 miles of the other sides base, I don't know any other pilot in their right mind that would've said in the fall of 2007 "gosh I think I'd like to see us merge with somebody!"
But keep this mind, the powers that be saw that a Delta and Northwest merger was necessary for survival and strength- and imho they were right. The only problem was for DALS is that NWA didn’t have UALs or AMRs base choices and frankly, vice-versa.
![Wink](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Think about everything that happened between 2008 and 2010 and tell me where we would’ve found the money and credit to double our fleet (221% increase for DALN and 183% for DALS), launch majorly into new world theatres and simultaneously pay down debt, beef up the airline (outside of CVG) and save $600M in annual cost?
Look at the competition and you'll see them contemplating starting what we started 2 years ago and they’ve got a lot of roadblocks ahead of them.
We're better off together then alone imho and our two airlines were the best merger option. As T said, its done now. This forum has a way of showing us that not everyone on either side is a homo... homogeneous group. I think honestly, given that we're all operating under the same pwa, DALN and DALS commuters will find a lot in common, DALN and DALS newhires will find a lot in common, old farts will find something in common, regional pilots will find someone else who shares their background and also never buys a round
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![forgot to bid is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rocky,
Have you ever heard the saying watch out what you wish for because you might just get it - well I think it applies here. Let’s do some quick math with very conservative numbers and see what the results are. If you don’t like my assumptions try it with your own.
12,000 Delta Pilots. 75% (conservative number) line-holders results in 9000 line-holders with an average line value of 75 hours a month.
Now lets assume 1/3 of the pilots try the over 80 hour thing and they average 83 hours each.
That’s 3000 pilots averaging 8 hours over the ALV or 24,000 pilot hours.
Divide 24,000 hours by 75 (ALV) and you just surplused 320 DAL pilots. Not to mention a proportionate number going from Captain to FO and from wide-body to narrow-body, line-holder to reserve etc. Maybe the 80+ hour premium pay was one of the factors that resulted in NW running a leaner operation requiring less pilots?
These numbers are notional but I assume the MEC used actual data when they decided on what method of premium pay to go with. Maybe someone (Slowplay or Sailing?) will chime in with a better analysis.
I am not saying that the G/S method is perfect, its not, but there is a reason it was chosen. And the thought of 12000+ pilots trying to fly over 80 hours a month has trouble written all over it -especially for junior guys.![Frown](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/frown.gif)
Scoop
PS This was discussed extensively a few thousand posts back.
PPS I am sorry, but I just noticed your analysis of the greenslips which I previously missed. Whatever your succint analysis of greenslips as "stupid" lacks in rigid scientific principals it more than makes up for it in being direct, to the point, and easy to understand.![Smile](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Have you ever heard the saying watch out what you wish for because you might just get it - well I think it applies here. Let’s do some quick math with very conservative numbers and see what the results are. If you don’t like my assumptions try it with your own.
12,000 Delta Pilots. 75% (conservative number) line-holders results in 9000 line-holders with an average line value of 75 hours a month.
Now lets assume 1/3 of the pilots try the over 80 hour thing and they average 83 hours each.
That’s 3000 pilots averaging 8 hours over the ALV or 24,000 pilot hours.
Divide 24,000 hours by 75 (ALV) and you just surplused 320 DAL pilots. Not to mention a proportionate number going from Captain to FO and from wide-body to narrow-body, line-holder to reserve etc. Maybe the 80+ hour premium pay was one of the factors that resulted in NW running a leaner operation requiring less pilots?
These numbers are notional but I assume the MEC used actual data when they decided on what method of premium pay to go with. Maybe someone (Slowplay or Sailing?) will chime in with a better analysis.
I am not saying that the G/S method is perfect, its not, but there is a reason it was chosen. And the thought of 12000+ pilots trying to fly over 80 hours a month has trouble written all over it -especially for junior guys.
![Frown](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/frown.gif)
Scoop
PS This was discussed extensively a few thousand posts back.
PPS I am sorry, but I just noticed your analysis of the greenslips which I previously missed. Whatever your succint analysis of greenslips as "stupid" lacks in rigid scientific principals it more than makes up for it in being direct, to the point, and easy to understand.
![Smile](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
1. It is really only an option that works for local guys who can make it to the airport fairly quickly.
2. Most GS trips go to guys in the top 50% of the list.
3. You are putting yourself on reserve.
4. You can't see who else has in a GS to see if you need to put yourself on reserve and wait around for the phone to ring with your bags packed.
5. The company will DH someone from China to get around giving out a GS trip.
It's just my opinion that we would be better off as a group with the old NWA way. I know that is heresy here, but that's what I think as an old DAL-S guy.
![RockyBoy is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post