Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2010, 06:40 PM
  #33781  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Thou shalt not post in anger, frustration or ill minded glee that thee will be wielding the words of wisdom that will forever silence someone else... because chances are at 9:30pm and after, it won't happen.

Take a break, post tomorrow or take the time to post responses as if the person reading it was a person you really liked and a person that respects you.

I was reading that thread on AA recalls and it makes me glad that, if true, that neither Northwest Airlines or Delta Air Lines would have a system where regional pilots will flow up while furloughed pilots stay furloughed.
The "steam" post was referring to the heated discussions by others that I may have unintentionally (OK intentionally) started. Ooopsy

P.S. Because of you guys, I'm going to have to file a tax extension. LOL
Waves is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 06:41 PM
  #33782  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Rocky,

Have you ever heard the saying watch out what you wish for because you might just get it - well I think it applies here. Let’s do some quick math with very conservative numbers and see what the results are. If you don’t like my assumptions try it with your own.

12,000 Delta Pilots. 75% (conservative number) line-holders results in 9000 line-holders with an average line value of 75 hours a month.

Now lets assume 1/3 of the pilots try the over 80 hour thing and they average 83 hours each.

That’s 3000 pilots averaging 8 hours over the ALV or 24,000 pilot hours.

Divide 24,000 hours by 75 (ALV) and you just surplused 320 DAL pilots. Not to mention a proportionate number going from Captain to FO and from wide-body to narrow-body, line-holder to reserve etc. Maybe the 80+ hour premium pay was one of the factors that resulted in NW running a leaner operation requiring less pilots?

These numbers are notional but I assume the MEC used actual data when they decided on what method of premium pay to go with. Maybe someone (Slowplay or Sailing?) will chime in with a better analysis.

I am not saying that the G/S method is perfect, its not, but there is a reason it was chosen. And the thought of 12000+ pilots trying to fly over 80 hours a month has trouble written all over it -especially for junior guys.


Scoop

PS This was discussed extensively a few thousand posts back.

PPS I am sorry, but I just noticed your analysis of the greenslips which I previously missed. Whatever your succint analysis of greenslips as "stupid" lacks in rigid scientific principals it more than makes up for it in being direct, to the point, and easy to understand.
If your argument is that picking up trips over 80 hrs at 1.5X pay would cause displacements/downgrades then doesn't doing GS flying do the same thing? If that is your concern, then nobody should ever fly over their ALV.
maddogmax is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 06:52 PM
  #33783  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Scoop, like I said in my post and having talked to the folks at the merger committee they did use real numbers to determine which was a better system and it was a wash in actual money paid out from the company to the pilots. The issue became how it was spread out among the pilots. But I am paraphrasing.

The one thing about GS's that will pull your hair out and thats just trying to determine what your monthly pay is to date as you progress through a month where you've earned GS's or having a rolling fart or a real rolling thunder going on. Credit is absolutely confusing imo.

It'd be nice if you could click on a trip in open time on icrew and say "WS" "GS" "YS" instead of writing it down on a piece of paper and inserting it into PCS. Same with figuring out your pay sometimes, you need a pencil and a copy of the contract in hand.

Its tantamount to having to write down trip numbers on a piece of paper so you can insert them into your white slip, you should be able to see "Your Pay in Hours to date is: 34" and
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 06:53 PM
  #33784  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Waves
The "steam" post was referring to the heated discussions by others that I may have unintentionally (OK intentionally) started. Ooopsy

P.S. Because of you guys, I'm going to have to file a tax extension. LOL
fwiw, what I wrote was not intended for you but for us all.

And fwiw, you can't file us as a tax deduction.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 06:55 PM
  #33785  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
This maypole has been run around for a long time... probably will be for a lot longer. personally I am past caring about it. We have what we have. I think.. and it is just my opinion... that the way we do it now is better because even the most junior in a given category has a chance of getting a GS. I am not so sure that would be the case with the over 80 hours at 1.5. Besides.. that method really seems like a lot more work would need to be done in order to make some coin. I honestly don't know, and some comparative data would be interesting. Have fun with your discussion.
Thanks T, remember when GS's were just awarded by seniority only? That was fantastic when I was #3 on the aircraft, but when I moved to a different seat it sucked. Ha They didn't spread the wealth at all. It was always just a handful of guys at the top who were just making a killing. No kidding, I remember a Captain years ago before the big pay raise we got, and he made almost $500K when most Captains were making less than $200K. I still beleive seniority should have its priveleges, but there should certainly be a limit to this. I don't have tany answers to which method is best, but I would certainly be up for 1.5X for any overtime flying and 2X for holidays. I guess my sticking point is what is overtime? I think it would have to be no more than 78 hours. Just my thoughts.
Waves is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 06:59 PM
  #33786  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Desperado
None of your/our business.
So what business is it of DALFA's to make remarks by name of the MEC Chair?

None. I note that you didn't respond to DALFA. Fair and balanced....
slowplay is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:01 PM
  #33787  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
fwiw, what I wrote was not intended for you but for us all.

And fwiw, you can't file us as a tax deduction.
Man, now ya tell me. LOL Crap, now I owe money.

Funny story: When I was a 727 SO, one of the FO's was talking about how he deducted this, and that, and this, and that. The Captain and I were quite surprised at some of the stuff he was deducting and queried him about them. His response was, " Hey, that's what I'm sending in. It's my first offer, if they don't like it, they can just let me know."
Waves is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:03 PM
  #33788  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,233
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop

..Divide 24,000 hours by 75 (ALV) and you just surplused 320 DAL pilots...
Good point. The more we [are willing to] work the less of us they need. We got to be careful or we can end up like CAL with 87 hour lines.
Lets work on other rules and rates instead.
Lifeisgood is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:05 PM
  #33789  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Before 2008 the world was a different ball game. We need to keep that in mind because this is a new world where pre 2001, pre 2005, pre 2008 are gone and nobody will be throwing us a pity party but us.

And, outside of the 982 guys from both sides that were living within 180 miles of the other sides base, I don't know any other pilot in their right mind that would've said in the fall of 2007 "gosh I think I'd like to see us merge with somebody!"

But keep this mind, the powers that be saw that a Delta and Northwest merger was necessary for survival and strength- and imho they were right. The only problem was for DALS is that NWA didn’t have UALs or AMRs base choices and frankly, vice-versa.

Think about everything that happened between 2008 and 2010 and tell me where we would’ve found the money and credit to double our fleet (221% increase for DALN and 183% for DALS), launch majorly into new world theatres and simultaneously pay down debt, beef up the airline (outside of CVG) and save $600M in annual cost?

Look at the competition and you'll see them contemplating starting what we started 2 years ago and they’ve got a lot of roadblocks ahead of them.

We're better off together then alone imho and our two airlines were the best merger option. As T said, its done now. This forum has a way of showing us that not everyone on either side is a homo... homogeneous group. I think honestly, given that we're all operating under the same pwa, DALN and DALS commuters will find a lot in common, DALN and DALS newhires will find a lot in common, old farts will find something in common, regional pilots will find someone else who shares their background and also never buys a round , LCA will find something in common, those who think supposed Boeing books suck will find things in common, those who hate 23K will find new friends, USAF 20 year guys will find new USAF guys, those who are just haters will find new friends, those have been hypnotized by McDonnell Douglas products will have stuff in common, former Navy pilots who are lucky to still be alive will find others who feel the same, the South America lovers- love on with your new friends, those who like Saipan honkey tonks- you're in luck, and so on.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:11 PM
  #33790  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Rocky,

Have you ever heard the saying watch out what you wish for because you might just get it - well I think it applies here. Let’s do some quick math with very conservative numbers and see what the results are. If you don’t like my assumptions try it with your own.

12,000 Delta Pilots. 75% (conservative number) line-holders results in 9000 line-holders with an average line value of 75 hours a month.

Now lets assume 1/3 of the pilots try the over 80 hour thing and they average 83 hours each.

That’s 3000 pilots averaging 8 hours over the ALV or 24,000 pilot hours.

Divide 24,000 hours by 75 (ALV) and you just surplused 320 DAL pilots. Not to mention a proportionate number going from Captain to FO and from wide-body to narrow-body, line-holder to reserve etc. Maybe the 80+ hour premium pay was one of the factors that resulted in NW running a leaner operation requiring less pilots?

These numbers are notional but I assume the MEC used actual data when they decided on what method of premium pay to go with. Maybe someone (Slowplay or Sailing?) will chime in with a better analysis.

I am not saying that the G/S method is perfect, its not, but there is a reason it was chosen. And the thought of 12000+ pilots trying to fly over 80 hours a month has trouble written all over it -especially for junior guys.


Scoop

PS This was discussed extensively a few thousand posts back.

PPS I am sorry, but I just noticed your analysis of the greenslips which I previously missed. Whatever your succint analysis of greenslips as "stupid" lacks in rigid scientific principals it more than makes up for it in being direct, to the point, and easy to understand.
I agree with your math and I'm not going to argue that it "may" cost pilot jobs, but so does putting in a GS. How many hours over 80 has PBS built into lines for pilots this year. I've had 5 months with over 80 hour lines in the past 12 months. If we had premium pay for that, maybe they would stop with the high ALV's and hire more guys. So I'm not sure it would actually cost any jobs to do it the other way. I've worked under both type systems and the premium pay over a certain credit is way more direct, to the point, and easy to understand, than figuring out how the GS system works. The reason I said the system was stupid (maybe I should have said inferior) is the because:

1. It is really only an option that works for local guys who can make it to the airport fairly quickly.

2. Most GS trips go to guys in the top 50% of the list.

3. You are putting yourself on reserve.

4. You can't see who else has in a GS to see if you need to put yourself on reserve and wait around for the phone to ring with your bags packed.

5. The company will DH someone from China to get around giving out a GS trip.

It's just my opinion that we would be better off as a group with the old NWA way. I know that is heresy here, but that's what I think as an old DAL-S guy.
RockyBoy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices