Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2010, 01:25 PM
  #33101  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Here is a link to a post about EU pilot pay from 2006. Enjoy

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...ay-scales.html
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 01:37 PM
  #33102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DFW Refugee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: JFK A-330 A
Posts: 277
Default

Originally Posted by Waves
Good point Keenster. DAL has also lost bases in SFO, SEA, PDX, DFW, MSY, MIA, MCO and nearly LAX.
Also BOS, IAH and ORD.
DFW Refugee is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 01:41 PM
  #33103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by DFW Refugee
Also BOS, IAH and ORD.
Thanks, I knew I was leaving some out, but I couldn't think of them.
Waves is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 02:16 PM
  #33104  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Didn't we have all those bases when Delta didn't allow jumpseaters, internal or external? Or was that never the case?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 02:27 PM
  #33105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DFW Refugee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: JFK A-330 A
Posts: 277
Default

Bucking:

"Doesn't your flight kit weigh enough without emotional baggage?"

It's business and safety-related. 'They' took DALPA's support (Picketing, etc...) and our money (Strike Assessment), then gave us...especially our furloughees, a 'New York Salute'. From a professional standpoint, having a person on the jumpseat that would be a distraction and adversely affect the safe conduct of the flight, is not something I would allow. YMMV.
DFW Refugee is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 02:39 PM
  #33106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by Ad Lib
Can't believe folks on this web board were giving your post the "high five." You are making management's argument which justifies Interest Based Bargaining. It sounds great coming from Ford & Harrison lawyer. I'm saddened to hear it from a pilot, despite your expert and rational presentation.

Lets look at the history of Interest Based Bargaining (IBB). Interest Based Bargaining was dreamed up by management consultants to cap and reduce their exposure to positional bargaining. The managers realized if they threw a budget on the table, then let the union decide how to allocate it, that the union would fight amongst itself over the pot of money. Meanwhile management could step back and watch the fur fly, as senior ate junior. The result of this change was a transformation from unions negotiating positions with management to internalizing those fights and negotiating with other union members. Unity was harmed in the process since now the union itself picked the winners and losers from amongst its membership. (Consider the DFR exposure United's MEC just got hit with and consider the effect of IBB practices)

Among your list of priorities you listed above the most obvious omission is SCOPE. In using your budget based approach to bargaining scope was on the table, it just wasn't a priority, so it got sold. However, the pilots never received the benefits of these "bargaining credits" because they got washed away in the subsequent deluge of bankruptcy.

Sir, IBB is a trap. It is a trap we must understand and deal with, but it is not something we should adopt in our own negotiations. Unions are more unified behind realistic positions.

It is my hope that my career progression is not again sacrificed to create credit for someone Else's budget item.
Go back and read it again, pal. I never said anything about interest based bargaining, whatever that means. You give some tortured definition, but I doubt that is the real one. There is no real budget established and the size of the pilot contract is not dictated by management, it is determined by economic conditions and the determination of the pilot group. I clearly indicated that I was using a metaphor for real bargaining because pilots that are not experienced in this type of negotiations can have a hard time wrapping their heads around the concepts. I also clearly indicated that the process of establishing the value of the contract and the areas where the value will be used is a parallel process that takes place in one sequence. You might want to actually read what was written before you start flaming like a fool.

Do you agree that there will, at some point, be a finite value in the pilot contract or is it just infinite? If it is infinite then I want a million dollars an hour, I will work for a month and then quit. If it is finite then priorities will have to be established by the pilots and the MEC. If you want to have to have more vacation then you will have to accept less gains in other areas of the contract and so on and so on. Why do you think they have a big contract survey? To establish priorities. Duh.

I did not mention scope, not because it is not important, but as you can see, you can't say the word scope on here without starting a massive food fight. Also, scope is not viewed as a quantifiable item per se, and I can't remember anytime "bargaining credits" were obtained through scope at Delta. Even in Chapter 11 we protected the vast majority of our scope language. Remember, that scope language is what saved us from the US Air takeover and saved about 1500 jobs of our most junior pilots. Quantify that, bub.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 02:53 PM
  #33107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Didn't we have all those bases when Delta didn't allow jumpseaters, internal or external? Or was that never the case?
Yes that is correct; however, I don't believe any of the base closures had any correlation with the jump seat issue. DAL management used the jumpseat issue as another high cost bargaining chip. As I have been saying all along. Every single thing we negotiate, or have negotiated in the past has been assigned a value. The jump seat issue cost us big time, but was definitely a must have item. The "No Furlough Clause" was also expensive but necessary.

P.S. Tangent not directed at forgot to bid: Many years ago, I was traveling through DEN and needed to JS on UAL Express. I was denied the request twice and finally had to buy an expensive last minute ticket to get where I was going. The Captain said, "If we can't ride on Delta, then you can't ride on us." It sucked and I was ticked, but he did have a point. It was futile to explain to him that management wouldn't give us the jumpseat. The bottom line was that we hadn't paid management enough to get it. Somewhere in that "bag o money" was the jumpseat, but we had not sacrificed enough in other areas to BUY the jumpseat privelege. From some of the responses I have received, I know that there are several people here that still do not understand or perhaps believe in "dollar store negotiations." Again I will emphasi: Every single item we negotiate has an assigned value. It can be a positive value or a negative value, but it has a value, real and perceived. Example: A "No Furlough Clause" is not free. A "Scope Clause" is not free. Medical Benefits are not free. OK, I'll stop, you guys get the point. Additionally, remember my "Money Bag" theory. It is a finite amount due to economics, and the bag's capacity is really only known to management. It is incumbent upon us to use the bag as a piñata, to discover it's contents, and to use the contents to our advantage.

Last edited by Waves; 04-06-2010 at 03:52 PM.
Waves is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 03:07 PM
  #33108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by DFW Refugee
Bucking:

"Doesn't your flight kit weigh enough without emotional baggage?"

It's business and safety-related. 'They' took DALPA's support (Picketing, etc...) and our money (Strike Assessment), then gave us...especially our furloughees, a 'New York Salute'. From a professional standpoint, having a person on the jumpseat that would be a distraction and adversely affect the safe conduct of the flight, is not something I would allow. YMMV.
As I mentioned earlier, the only reason I allow CA guys on the jumpseat is because I know some of our guys need to ride with them sometimes. I didn't want to start a war and punish the wrong guys. If it weren't for that, they would not be allowed on my jumpseat.

Also as I mentioned before, not only did they use our guys as bargaining chips, but when they went on strike, they falsely accused us of flying their work. That ticked me off even further. So any of the touchy feely guys (not you) who want to forgive them can, but I ain't one of them.
Waves is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:06 PM
  #33109  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 42
Default

Anyone in the know want to comment on validity of following I heard on my last trip:

1. Goal of DAL is in the neighborhood of 50 777s by 2016

2. 10 more 747-4s coming in next year and a half due to 787 delay..there were other aircraft in this payment for delay but i don't remember the exact numbers

3. One of our DCI carriers, out of the 13 million outstanding DCI carriers, will be opening a DFW base to feed increase in flying out of there. AF may bring back the international flight out of there too and (drumroll)....Delta to ASIA out of DFW? maybe done via DFW to LAX or SEA though.

4. Hiring 400 to start in the fall.

5. Delta has made their order for the 100 seater.
Maddog Waddle is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:15 PM
  #33110  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog Waddle
Anyone in the know want to comment on validity of following I heard on my last trip:

1. Goal of DAL is in the neighborhood of 50 777s by 2016

2. 10 more 747-4s coming in next year and a half due to 787 delay..there were other aircraft in this payment for delay but i don't remember the exact numbers

3. One of our DCI carriers, out of the 13 million outstanding DCI carriers, will be opening a DFW base to feed increase in flying out of there. AF may bring back the international flight out of there too and (drumroll)....Delta to ASIA out of DFW? maybe done via DFW to LAX or SEA though.

4. Hiring 400 to start in the fall.

5. Delta has made their order for the 100 seater.
Some good stuff in there

1) I am sure we will get more 777's

2) Maybe. A fleet of 25 is the ideal fleet for marketing to optimize profit on the 744

3) Might be linked to the Freedom settlement. I know they were looking at adding them out there. The rest of it was tied to JAL. I see increased DFW flying in a big way, but I think they have opted out of a mainline base for the near future.

4) Flows and recalls first. Aug to early 2011. Oil price will determine when.

5) Maybe maybe not, some call it the MD-90.

I could post more, but that is good enough for now.
acl65pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices