Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2010, 12:43 PM
  #32851  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: SLC ERB
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
When I went through indoc, there were roughly 60 new hires in the class. Of those new hires, there maybe was one (if that) ComAir folks in my class. ASA made up the majority of our commuter folks.
Were you in the St Patrick's day class? There was indeed one Comair pilot in that that (our?) class. There were a bunch of ASA and ExpressJet pilots - but only one Comair.
Dash8widget is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 12:55 PM
  #32852  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They are that short sited. Right after Delta completed the purchase of Comair and ASA there was a push on within the Delta MEC to attempt to get the company to merge the seniority lists. They held a meeting with Comair and ASA to discuss trying to establish a method to work on this goal. The meeting did not go well and the concept died at Delta. Lawson and another individual who's name I forget made it quite clear what their DEMANDS were. The only exceptable solution for them was that we push for a immediate merger of the lists and it be done by ALPA merger policy and they let it be known that they viewed that as DOH and that was what they would be asking for. No prenuptial agreement would be considered by them other then DOH. That was the end of support from the Delta MEC.
That is close to being true, but not exactly. The Delta MEC never wanted the ASA or Comair pilots and preemptively made sure changes were made to ALPA's Constitution and Bylaws to change the definitions which trigger the union's longstanding merger and fragmentation policy. Specifically, the definition of "operational integration" was removed.

The reasons Giambusso cited were that if ASA & Comair were merged a military pilot would have a choice of flying an RJ for Delta, or a real airplane at American. By merging our carriers Delta would not be as attractive to military pilots. When asked if he was speaking on behalf of our union, or on the behalf of future military pilots, Giambusso stated he had been a military pilot for many more years than he had been an ALPA member. He also made comments about the education, experience level and belief that many ASA pilots had DUI's. In any event, ASA & Comair pilots were not former military pilots and generally not up to Delta's standards.

Thus rebuked, the ASA and Comair pilots tried to push the issue through ALPA national. Being somewhat unsophisticated at the game on this level they followed the procedures laid out by our union like a sequential check list. One of those procedures was to make the application WITHOUT presupposing a seniority outcome.

In simple terms the union was to decide IF there was going to be a merger before the players put forward their seniority integration methodologies.

In the crew room briefings the question of SLI came up. The ASA & Comair pilots were both told (I was there as an ASA pilot) that "ALPA seniority integration recognizes the status quo ... that means lists are most commonly integrated by paycheck or equipment, in either case that would mean a STAPLE."

On the other side of the concourse Delta pilots were being told ASA & Comair pilots were demanding "Date of Hire." That statement was untrue, but it helped politically galvanize the Delta pilots by giving them a common enemy.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 04-05-2010 at 01:07 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:05 PM
  #32853  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget
Were you in the St Patrick's day class? There was indeed one Comair pilot in that that (our?) class. There were a bunch of ASA and ExpressJet pilots - but only one Comair.
Yes, we're classmates! Coolness.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:12 PM
  #32854  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

It would be nice to unwind the clock....

Flying gone and opportunities missed either way.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:14 PM
  #32855  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Bar,

I agree that we should have gone to Delta Management because we owned Comair and ASA........that being said, for Lawson to demand the things he did in that letter was a slap in the face to every Delta Pilot.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:17 PM
  #32856  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Denny;
Agreed, it was divisive. I still effects a great many things today.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:17 PM
  #32857  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
That is close to being true, but not exactly. The Delta MEC never wanted the ASA or Comair pilots and preemptively made sure changes were made to ALPA's Constitution and Bylaws to change the definitions which trigger the union's longstanding merger and fragmentation policy. Specifically, the definition of "operational integration" was removed.

The reasons Giambusso cited were that if ASA & Comair were merged a military pilot would have a choice of flying an RJ for Delta, or a real airplane at American. By merging our carriers Delta would not be as attractive to military pilots. When asked if he was speaking on behalf of our union, or on the behalf of future military pilots, Giambusso stated he had been a military pilot for many more years than he had been an ALPA member. He also made comments about the education, experience level and belief that many ASA pilots had DUI's. In any event, ASA & Comair pilots were not former military pilots and generally not up to Delta's standards.

Thus rebuked, the ASA and Comair pilots tried to push the issue through ALPA national. Being somewhat unsophisticated at the game on this level they followed the procedures laid out by our union like a sequential check list. One of those procedures was to make the application WITHOUT presupposing a seniority outcome.

In simple terms the union was to decide IF there was going to be a merger before the players put forward their seniority integration methodologies.

In the crew room briefings the question of SLI came up. The ASA & Comair pilots were both told (I was there as an ASA pilot) that "ALPA seniority integration recognizes the status quo ... that means lists are most commonly integrated by paycheck or equipment, in either case that would mean a STAPLE."

On the other side of the concourse Delta pilots were being told ASA & Comair pilots were demanding "Date of Hire." That statement was untrue, but it helped politically galvanize the Delta pilots by giving them a common enemy.
It was true if you reference the stated positions of Lawson and his MEC Chair predecessor Dick DeleGarde.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:18 PM
  #32858  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Sweet Jesus. They asked for relaxed scope that was limiting their growth???

Any regional pilot group needs to be VERY wary of lifers on their MEC.
What had been Comair flying was being outsourced to other members of the DCI portfolio. Comair was afraid of exactly what did happen to them. Today they are a shadow of what they used to be. Lawson was trying to protect the job security and career progression of his pilots.

After all Delta wanted Lawson to negotiate something with his management, Lawson wanted some help in return.

Was he a jerk - sure. Was he offensive - absolutely. Was he trying to get the Delta pilots to negotiate - yes.

At ASA we welcomed our Delta brothers with open arms. We figured it was better to build bridges. Further - we told him it was wrong to use furloughed pilots as bargaining chips.

While Lawson shot us in the back on several occasions and there IS bad blood, he was trying to protect his pilots - that was his job.

Just because I understand what he was doing does not mean I condone it. But it is pretty easy to see what has happened to that airline under Delta's stewardship.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:22 PM
  #32859  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
That is close to being true, but not exactly. The Delta MEC never wanted the ASA or Comair pilots and preemptively made sure changes were made to ALPA's Constitution and Bylaws to change the definitions which trigger the union's longstanding merger and fragmentation policy. Specifically, the definition of "operational integration" was removed.

The reasons Giambusso cited were that if ASA & Comair were merged a military pilot would have a choice of flying an RJ for Delta, or a real airplane at American. By merging our carriers Delta would not be as attractive to military pilots. When asked if he was speaking on behalf of our union, or on the behalf of future military pilots, Giambusso stated he had been a military pilot for many more years than he had been an ALPA member. He also made comments about the education, experience level and belief that many ASA pilots had DUI's. In any event, ASA & Comair pilots were not former military pilots and generally not up to Delta's standards.

Thus rebuked, the ASA and Comair pilots tried to push the issue through ALPA national. Being somewhat unsophisticated at the game on this level they followed the procedures laid out by our union like a sequential check list. One of those procedures was to make the application WITHOUT presupposing a seniority outcome.

In simple terms the union was to decide IF there was going to be a merger before the players put forward their seniority integration methodologies.

In the crew room briefings the question of SLI came up. The ASA & Comair pilots were both told (I was there as an ASA pilot) that "ALPA seniority integration recognizes the status quo ... that means lists are most commonly integrated by paycheck or equipment, in either case that would mean a STAPLE."

On the other side of the concourse Delta pilots were being told ASA & Comair pilots were demanding "Date of Hire." That statement was untrue, but it helped politically galvanize the Delta pilots by giving them a common enemy.
I was at the meeting. I heard Lawson state that ALPA merger policy was all they would except unless a prenup was DOH. Seemed pretty clear to me what his demands were. I never heard CG express what you state. Not saying it did not happen but I never heard him make those kind of statements. There was a surprising amount of MEC support to try and convince the company to merge the lists. I don't think however we would have ever convinced the company to due that for many reasons short of massive concessions in every other area of the contract and management retaining the ability to split off Comair and ASA for sale if they desired.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 01:25 PM
  #32860  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Waves, trying to PM you. Wassup? No PM's?
Sorry ac, had to put the laptop down and begin my descent. LOL Actually I had to leave the office and run some errands.
Waves is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices