Carl Spackler

Me?...Grumpy?...

I'm soooo misunderstood.

Carl

FmrFreightDog

"The Moon is a Harsh Mistress."

Love Heinlein.

FmrFreightDog

DOH!! You missed the Scarlett Johannsen & Pokemon sex scene. Once you get past the big yellow thing in the way, it wasn't half bad.....

FmrFreightDog

[lisp] Shazam!! [/lisp]

:P

Didn't know you were in the Air Force, FtB.....

forgot to bid

Thanks Super... this is an anonymous thread and now everyone knows what I look like and how much of an awkward moron I evidently am. With hair growing out of my forehead no less.

Speaking of Delta videos check out this one and make sure you watch the whole thing: Aviation Video: Boeing 737-300 - Delta Air Lines landing on the express 31 visual in LGA.

WOW.
WOW. What a video.
BTW, Captains should eat at Five Guys... more often then I do.

Thats because you are the international man of mystery.

Jay5150

No -and- Yes

You can't put in any qualifiers in the "swap with the pot" like you can with say, green slips or white slips. Like flyguy said you can put a star in front of a number for the pickup (*3 in his example). But be warned. What you've just told PCS to do is trade your trip for any three day trip starting on the date you specified. So unless your flying the absolute worst three-day in the bid pack, this is a big gamble because you could end up swapping your so-so trip for a real dog. This system sucks, and is near the top of my list of things I'd like to see changed about icrew.

Now for the yes part.

I'm reluctant to spill it because most guys don't use it, and I'm somewhat junior on my equipment, thus I use this to better my month quite often. What you have to do is use ezswap. It's part of the flightline data software that you can get. Most guys just use it for ezbid, the bid sorting program, but it'll do alot of other things as well. One of them is ezswap. What you do is set qualifiers, much like when you're sorting your bid. (report times, release times, total pay etc...) It then takes all the trips in the bid pack that match your prefs, sorts them and dials into icrew and submits a swap. It'll be the trip your trying to drop up top, followed by dozens if not hundreds of pick-up requests for all the trips meeting your prefs and ranked from most desirable to least. There are limitations. You only have eight "slots" for swap requests available in icrew. Each of those slots only has room for 99 pickup requests. So in effect you've got, what, 792 "pickup" spots available. Sounds like alot, but you can chew through 'em pretty quick. I could go on and on about how to use it, but after playing with it a bit and reading the help sections, you should be able to figure it out.

So there you go, my gift to our new brothers. If I ever pull gear for ya, first round's on you guys.

KC10 FATboy

Does anyone have any notes of what was said during RA's visit to CVG today?

DAL 88 Driver

The following post was posted a couple of days ago on the DALPA Forum. I have permission from the poster to share it here. I took out the first two sentences because they contain the names of two individuals. In any case, I think this adds some important perspective to where we find ourselves these days. Keep in mind that the poster is not suggesting this as an actual model for calculating pay. It is intended to put our pay into perspective. Enjoy...



We all should know that pilot pay is but one component of the company's overall expenses and that achieving profitability is a complex goal for management. Nevertheless, I want to address another legitimate perspective on current and future pilot pay that deserves serious attention, namely the perspective gained by considering how much each passenger actually pays the pilots who safely fly them to their destinations. Shoot me down here - or agree - that this is a legitimate perspective we should be pushing more publicly. Whatever your response is if it's thoughtful I welcome it.

I fly captain on MD-88's and MD-90's. For argument purposes let's say my average seat count is 145 passengers. I'm sure somebody has the average load factor for these narrow body aircraft, but it looked pretty high to me in 2009. If it was 80%, then the average number of passengers on board an MD-88/90 was 116.

If every passenger with this load factor directly paid me $1.30/hour that would have covered my $150/hour 2009 wage. We have various employee benefits, and credit hours that are not directly productive, so ballpark we could probably agree $.70/hour more might cover those extra costs? So if the load factor is 80% and every passenger pays the captain $2/hour (and the FO $1.50/hour), then we're talking $3.50/hour going to both pilots of an MD88/90. Our legs probably average two hours.

We should all think about this for a few moments. Passengers pay hundreds, usually many hundreds of dollars per leg to fly on our jets. If my arithmetic is accurate it means passengers pay narrow body captains and their FO's about $7 total of their fare for a typical two hour flight - a very small percentage of their ticket cost. If this is true, how is it that a minimum cost of living pilot pay raise in any economic environment hasn't been demanded by DALPA and cannot be accommodated by management? How is it that the pay cuts we endured were not defended against in such visible and defensible terms? For management to pay both an MD-88/90 captain and the FO 116 more dollars/hour each - and again cover our credit hour costs and retirement benefits - all they'd have to do is directly pass on to passengers a $3.50/hour increase in the price of their ticket. $150, plus $116, would be $266/hour for MD-88/90 captains. And over $200/hour for FO's. Now we're beginning to talk real pay and DC retirement fund restoration.

More perspective. I tip the van driver two bucks if he takes me anywhere but to an airport hotel. I tip the Sky Cap a buck a bag to check my bags and family in at the curb - four bucks for about four minutes of his life. If every passenger tipped me a buck a minute - $120 for the two hour flight - times 116 passengers - that would be $13,920 for one flight. I don't expect anyone to tip, or pay, pilots like they might tip Sky Caps, but how about another $3.50/hour as eminently reasonable?

If polled, how many passengers would complain that paying a total of $10.50 instead of the current $7 they're paying to the two pilots for their two hour trip would be an unfair burden? How many of our passengers, the overwhelming majority of whom have a nice word to say to us upon deplaning, would say we don't deserve it? How many would be shocked to hear how little of their ticket price flows to us? I know the personal investment in our piloting skill sets we've all made - the under pressure training, flying experience, sound judgment - and our unique career terminating risks from loss of medical or FAA certificate action (not to mention being the continual focus of terrorist attack) - everything we bring to the air travel experience at Delta is worth far more to the passengers than they're currently paying directly to us. I'd like to see what they pay to pilots broken out on their ticket stub, just like taxes, fuel surcharges and whatever else is listed so they can know exactly what they're paying us. I believe most passengers would agree they could and should pay their pilots more. Especially when it would take such a small increase in a ticket's price going directly to pilots to offset the historically crushing effects of inflation combined with the recent successful attacks by managements in bankruptcy to gut pilot standards of living.

There was never not a time to publicly, loudly and longly make the it's a very small percentage of your ticket price argument to the world, but the time is especially ripe now to set the stage for truly restorative pay raises in the near future - with the abusive pay and work rules at the so-called regionals getting congressional scrutiny and media coverage and people widely appreciating split second life-saving performances of major airline pilots like Sully and Skiles.

As always during my 19 years here at Delta I'm left wondering why this argument has never been made. It hasn't been made to us by our union in rallying support for a strike vote. Its never been made to my knowledge in the public arena. How does management get away with ever (Ron Allen, Ed Bastion in bankruptcy court) saying we don't merit our pay? Or get away with saying they can't pay any more - not even a small 1-2 percentage increase in an average ticket price that could flow to pilots and quickly get us back to 1987 purchasing power wages? How come DALPA - my labor union not just my schedule with safety association - never frames the argument in such simple, easy to fathom, dollars directly paid to pilots by passengers terms? Never slaps down demonstrably hollow management claims with simple arithmetic? How about a few full page ads in USA today informing the flying pubic how little they actually pay to their pilots when management again tells us we cost too much in 2012 and restoring the profession is out of the question?

The difference between a $100,000 annual raise for all Delta pilots (about the amount we each lost since 2004) and what we're making now is less than the price of two fancy cups of coffee many of our passengers think nothing of buying before boarding a Delta airplane. That, my fellow pilots, is flat out amazing to me. Pilot pay as a percentage of ticket price should inform us, our management and the flying public as we move forward to a deservedly brighter future.

KC10 FATboy

And does anyone want to take any guesses as to how big our losses are for the quarter and year? They get announced Tuesday morning.

Toejam

If you use the previous poster's math, we probably made a couple $100B...