Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2010, 03:51 PM
  #23801  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingViking
We should insist on widebody fences. No AK pilot would have a chance of WB long haul flying so why should the merger change that? And why should people that fought hard to get into Delta accept that AK pilots gets in front of them on their way to the WB seat? Nothing but a permanent fence should be accepted, unless an AK pilot interviews with DAL and starts from the bottom just like the rest of us did. Pretty simple really.

I agree that should be a period of fencing and appropriate ratio, however I strongly disagree with the idea of permanent fencing. If we merge, they will be DAL pilots just like the NWA (republic, southern, hughes, north central etc), Wester, Pan Am, and whatever other carriers we have in our lineage.

Fence it off for a bit to keep the initial shock as minimal as possible, and then have it be done with....
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 03:54 PM
  #23802  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Starboard Side, weekends & holidays.
Posts: 856
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I agree that should be a period of fencing and appropriate ratio, however I strongly disagree with the idea of permanent fencing. If we merge, they will be DAL pilots just like the NWA (republic, southern, hughes, north central etc), Wester, Pan Am, and whatever other carriers we have in our lineage.

Fence it off for a bit to keep the initial shock as minimal as possible, and then have it be done with....
You're early tonight
FmrFreightDog is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:05 PM
  #23803  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Model Citezen
Slo,
What I am saying that there are some great expectations being fostered out there. There seems to be a big parade that this JAL/DAL hook up is a great thing..... I am wanting to see and read the details before I hop on a band wagon.
I understand and agree.

Originally Posted by Model Citezen
Was Frankfurt also slot controlled (like NRT)? Yes
When was open skies in Europe vs Japan (Not Asia)? 2/29/96
When did UAL get the code share with Lufthansa? 5/14/97
Was not the 777 going to be the Pacific 767? Some bought it for that reason. Delta and others did not.
The 787 was to offer a smaller size 777 with longer range, better fuel economy, AND better maintenance intervals. Hopefully it will eventually deliver all those attributes...airlines have ordered 840 of them because of those features.

Originally Posted by Model Citezen
I truly due GET IT that any company must turn a profit. After this merger between DAL/NWA the pilots rates SHOULD HAVE matched or exceed AMR's rates at the time the deal was done.
You lose me here. While I would like my C2K rates adjusted for inflation back, reality is quite different. We got the best deal we could negotiate, including 5.6% of the company for pilots. At today's stock price, that's worth almost $600 million. That had never been done before in an airline merger, and almost everyone leaves it out of the compensation package. Also, our 777 and 73N rates are higher than American's today, and even though they never went through bankruptcy our work rules are generally better.

Originally Posted by Model Citezen
For the record, Southwests pilots are where they are due to the chapter 11's in the 2000's by NWA, USAir, DAL and UAL. They were always under what the legacy's had paid. Their rates ,now in some cases, exceed wide body pay rates.
Agreed. They undercut us for years and made it up through growth and stock price appreciation.
slowplay is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:07 PM
  #23804  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyingViking's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B-7ER JFK
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I agree that should be a period of fencing and appropriate ratio, however I strongly disagree with the idea of permanent fencing. If we merge, they will be DAL pilots just like the NWA (republic, southern, hughes, north central etc), Wester, Pan Am, and whatever other carriers we have in our lineage.

Fence it off for a bit to keep the initial shock as minimal as possible, and then have it be done with....
If the negotiations drag out I might be able to settle for a 30 year fence. Anything else would be highly unfair to junior Delta guys who skipped AK, LUV, B6 and others to get to the WB flying with a Legacy. 30 years will also be in line with career expectations. This might sounds harsh, but think about it, it is not comparable to the NWA / DAL merger as far as eqipment is concerned. If we implement same pay for all aircrafts, which in reality is the only fair way of pilot compensation, I would still go for a 30 year fence. One thing I would also go for is to get ALL furloughed pilots from AK back flying before SLI.

Just my $ 0.02
FlyingViking is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:20 PM
  #23805  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Of course. The baseline mainline fleet to add any 76 seaters is 768 jets. There are 33 DC-9-30/40 planned to be parked, so management would have to cover those losses with replacement aircraft and then add the number above to add 76 seaters,
Thought so. Thanks slowplay.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:26 PM
  #23806  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingViking
We should insist on widebody fences. No AK pilot would have a chance of WB long haul flying so why should the merger change that? And why should people that fought hard to get into Delta accept that AK pilots gets in front of them on their way to the WB seat? Nothing but a permanent fence should be accepted, unless an AK pilot interviews with DAL and starts from the bottom just like the rest of us did. Pretty simple really.
And you wonder why seniority lists are arbitrated....
slowplay is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:29 PM
  #23807  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingViking
If the negotiations drag out I might be able to settle for a 30 year fence. Anything else would be highly unfair to junior Delta guys who skipped AK, LUV, B6 and others to get to the WB flying with a Legacy. 30 years will also be in line with career expectations. This might sounds harsh, but think about it, it is not comparable to the NWA / DAL merger as far as eqipment is concerned. If we implement same pay for all aircrafts, which in reality is the only fair way of pilot compensation, I would still go for a 30 year fence. One thing I would also go for is to get ALL furloughed pilots from AK back flying before SLI.

Just my $ 0.02

I was thinking 10.... just trying to be reasonable and logical.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:29 PM
  #23808  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by FmrFreightDog
You're early tonight

It's a 24 hour job being me.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:43 PM
  #23809  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Superdad's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Posts: 397
Default

AK stopped hiring long before DAL began its last round so any SLI would expose a lot of junior DAL guys to an unfair outcome. Junior DAL pilots who worked hard to get here should have their career expectation of flying a WB preserved over that of a AK pilot.
Superdad is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:52 PM
  #23810  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingViking
We should insist on widebody fences. No AK pilot would have a chance of WB long haul flying so why should the merger change that? And why should people that fought hard to get into Delta accept that AK pilots gets in front of them on their way to the WB seat? Nothing but a permanent fence should be accepted, unless an AK pilot interviews with DAL and starts from the bottom just like the rest of us did. Pretty simple really.
Well, that didn't take long. Love that "career expectations" argument.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Fence it off for a bit to keep the initial shock as minimal as possible, and then have it be done with....
Oh no! The voice of reason. Careful or you'll get a blanket party from your buddies.

Originally Posted by Superdad
AK stopped hiring long before DAL began its last round so any SLI would expose a lot of junior DAL guys to an unfair outcome. Junior DAL pilots who worked hard to get here should have their career expectation of flying a WB preserved over that of a AK pilot.
Again there's your "career expectations" argument.

You know, if we had a real Union, instead of a Association of self-interest motivated MECs, we'd have a National Seniority List and all mergers would be strictly DoH.

Too bad the United gorilla gutted the Merger/Frag policy back in the days when they were trying to screw the USAir guys in their original abortive takeover attempt.

Oh well. If it makes you fellas feel any better, you can have all your widebody flying. The average Alaska pilot hates the idea of a DAL merger like poison.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices