Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Newbie here - be nice. This sure seem like a more spin free zone than the web boards
Do we have any official comments, either MEC or Co. regarding the Japan so-called Open Skies?
Other than divining the press statements by Anderson et al, do we have any flavor of the way the JAL deal is going?
Do we have any official comments, either MEC or Co. regarding the Japan so-called Open Skies?
Other than divining the press statements by Anderson et al, do we have any flavor of the way the JAL deal is going?
Chairman Moak has been in numerous meetings with Richard Anderson and the two of them have already come up with a proposed solution that will allow Delta to share in the Trans-Pacific market with JAL.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Last edited by Check Essential; 12-13-2009 at 06:35 AM.
That'd be funny if I didn't believe they would try it
I just spoke with one of our MEC reps. They are all over this situation.
Chairman Moak has been in numerous meetings with Richard Anderson and the two of them have already come up with a proposed solution that will allow Delta to share in the Trans-Pacific market with JAL.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Chairman Moak has been in numerous meetings with Richard Anderson and the two of them have already come up with a proposed solution that will allow Delta to share in the Trans-Pacific market with JAL.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Wow a photo shop on Sunday AM. Man you must have had your coffee!
I like it though, maybe that should be my new Pic......
I will say this, and do not burn me or kill me.
He has admitted that he knows ppl commute for reasons other than choice. It is the opposing view, just to be opposing. Much like Slow does on here. Be contradictory just to be that way.
Fact is that the company will need new and improved policy. Why, because they will need it, if 70+ percent commute on a sked that is very tight. He and Sailing have even hinted that it is a desire but we need to wait until the AFA and the FA's find their way.
He has admitted that he knows ppl commute for reasons other than choice. It is the opposing view, just to be opposing. Much like Slow does on here. Be contradictory just to be that way.
Fact is that the company will need new and improved policy. Why, because they will need it, if 70+ percent commute on a sked that is very tight. He and Sailing have even hinted that it is a desire but we need to wait until the AFA and the FA's find their way.
I just spoke with one of our MEC reps. They are all over this situation.
Chairman Moak has been in numerous meetings with Richard Anderson and the two of them have already come up with a proposed solution that will allow Delta to share in the Trans-Pacific market with JAL.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Chairman Moak has been in numerous meetings with Richard Anderson and the two of them have already come up with a proposed solution that will allow Delta to share in the Trans-Pacific market with JAL.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
after studying this photo and comparing the CRJesq aircraft to the 747, i've come to the conclusion that the "CRJ" must be some new Uber CRJ. I call left seat
I not saying they are MEC members. They have valuable insight to the way the MEC is thinking, and how they view things.
I do not think the MEC guys would get on here.
I do not think the MEC guys would get on here.
Last edited by acl65pilot; 12-13-2009 at 06:41 AM.
The NWA members of the MEC call that one a "Super-Premium" CRJ.
Here's a better perspective:
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
I mean, I just don't understand the "anti-commuter" philosophy we have...yes sometimes it's by choice...but more often than not...it's not by choice and some senior guys tend to forget that. They also seem to forget how it felt to be JUNIOR. I promise all of my Delta boys this......if I am fortunate enough to live a long career with this great company.....even when I am senior....I will NEVER forget or misrepresent the junior guys. NEVER.
There are a host of bad assumptions in this thread.
First, there are over 3800 pilots flying out of Atlanta. Last number I saw only showed 2100 living withing a 2 hour driving radius. That means 1700 would be considered "commuters". Also, all those "senior" guys that you try to start class warfare with have seen the closing on the southside of BOS, MIA, MCO, ORD, IAH, DFW, MSY, SFO, PDX, SEA during the last 20 years. The North guys have a similar story. During that time there has also been a substantial reallocation of equipment from base to base that has caused a lot of displacements, many of which were during economic recession.
Second, the majority of the "ALPA guys" either are commuters or have in the past. The current MEC Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary, Transition Coordinator, Negotiating Committee Chairman and two members, Comm Chair, etc, are all commuters and most were prior to doing ALPA work. I'm guessing they don't hate commuters as they are commuters.
Third, while this AE reduces the number of widebody seats in ATL, it's not the first time base realignment has happened. While mitigated by pilot retirements, Atlanta saw a very quick reduction in only partially replaced widebody positions when we parked the 56 TriStars and 15 MD-11's, replacing them with 21 767-400's and 7 777.
Fourth, PG is right regarding sick leave. It's for when you're sick, not for when you can't commute. Both north and south took huge sick leave hits in bankruptcy. Guess what, when we got less sick leave and/or were paid less for it, it's use went WAY down. That's a direct cost (savings) to the contract, and ignoring or excusing the use of sick leave as platinum days/commuter protection ignores that it costs (and did cost) all of us. For the whiners on this point, calling people "management stooges" for pointing out the facts reflects a lack of integrity and ignores the reality that we've been through.
Fifth, the group here is really good at attacking each other while ignoring the elephant in the room. Because of the reasons above, I'm very interested in seeing an "enhanced" commuter policy (I've been displaced just about as often as I've seen "entitlements" in my time here). That said, all the "pro-commuter" arguments in the world will fail when Congress panders and legislates a commuting policy based on the Colgan crash. What certain Senators want is draconian, and they don't appear to care that you're updside down in your house, have a sick family member, or a wife with a good job. They believe it is a choice.... It's not close to a done deal, but look at last week's Senate Aviation Safety hearing for what some of the rulemakers are thinking.
Well, there is good and bad there Satch and Super. The curse of the Heisman is now on Ingram, so Super +1 for you, but Ingram is like one of 3 running backs so +1 for Satch- especially since Auburn proved you can stop Ingram and Alabama for 3.7 quarters and not win.
They truly need a life time award for a college football senior. I think Tebow would've won, but, ever since the Bob Griese driven "Anyone But Manning" debacle a couple of years ago there needs to be an award for those who've achieved overall versus who achieved just this year- Woodson, never deserved it fwiw. THANK YOU! The Heisman straddles the fence on that, rarely (until recently) giving awards to the most deserving player because they're a freshman or sophmore but then giving it to them a year later when they don't deserve it. Thats what Herschel Walker said, he deserved it and didn't get it and then got it when he didn't deserve it. .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post