Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 430
In the 21st century, it would seem to be an easy fix to allow reserve pilots to check a box for each day of reserve to "defer to OOBWS". Then reserve pilots who want to fly (commuters?) can do so, and those who want to stay home can let out of base white slippers have a shot.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,111
Thanks Ray Red, I should have been clearer. I've had a trip with an LCA bought for OE. It's still on my schedule, just with a code next to it that shows it's pay protected. I wasn't sure if I put in for a GS it would be ignored by the system because the trip was still showing on my schedule and one could only be awarded a GSWC at that point. It sounds like you're saying to GS and get double pay on top of the pay protection, basically amounting to triple pay. No wonder the guys above me try to fly with check airmen all the time!
I know junior guys on the narrowbody categories that get trips awarded with LCA every month..Mainly because many of the LCA are junior and they do terrible trips over the weekends. A lot of the senior FO's don't risk bidding a bad trip with a LCA because it is so hard to swap(if training is not put on that trip) now with all the reserve avail days capped(and pilots blocked to 90 hours on PBS award). Plus a large number of LCA swap trips after initial award, and when they do this junior pilots get the reward of having that trip bought. Losing LCA trip buys would be a big concession for all FO's.
There are all kinds of 2nd and 3rd order effects which we probably haven't even thought about. In my case, I've been rolling thunder since April. Its has given me excellent compensation and very good control over my schedule. If senior FOs weren't able to do their LCA bidding (which is even more lucrative) then there is no way I'd have been able to get a schedule which lets me RT since they would have been doing it instead. People are either kidding themselves or outright lying if they try to tell you LCA bids won't have negative implications on the vast majority of FOs and quite a few captains as well.
I don't know how many LCA trip buy-outs are happening on the WBs, but again, think big picture. Retirements haven't started yet, once they do where do you think they will come from? Imagine life as a WB FO and pulling in triple pay for the month. I'm sure the company has exact numbers, I'll just throw out a hypothetical number and even if my number is wrong the argument isn't. Say we have 15% of FOs making more money than the guy in the left seat. That's basically 15% more captain positions. What if the company's opener was we should eliminate 15% of our captain positions? Would anybody vote for that?
One small blurb on PS. Somebody posted a great PS summary on the widget FB page and here's a takeaway I never considered. Say we trade PS for pay rates. Think about the next time we go to negotiate a contract and our rates are equal to or exceed our competition -- what are the odds we'll then get more? Think about when our competition gets a pay raise that would have triggered a free "me too" pay raise. If we trade rates for PS then that free raise is gone and instead all we did was give our competition a "me too" raise. The only counter to this argument that I've found some merit in, is if you believe we will not continue to be profitable.
I have a 3 automatic no votes, I think everybody else should too:
1. No LCA bidding concessions
2. No PS trades or concessions
3. No scope concessions
There is no reason for ANY concessions at this time.
1. No productivity concession (vacation sell, virtual basing, TLV increase) etc.
2. No scope concessions. Are we ever going to have a scope gain?
3. Pay must be United + with NO profit sharing give.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,995
I only have one. If I will spend more time in a Delta uniform and not less, it's an easy no for me.
2. We don't need Scope. I got plenty left over from the amenity bags on all my international DH's.
3. The company is doing great but could do better if we take a voluntary 10% pay cut. Let's all get on board!!!!
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
1. I'll vote yes on anything that let's me fly more. Can't believe they pay me to do this!!!! I'm giddy everytime I see myself in uniform.
2. We don't need Scope. I got plenty left over from the amenity bags on all my international DH's.
3. The company is doing great but could do better if we take a voluntary 10% pay cut. Let's all get on board!!!!
2. We don't need Scope. I got plenty left over from the amenity bags on all my international DH's.
3. The company is doing great but could do better if we take a voluntary 10% pay cut. Let's all get on board!!!!
TEN
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post