Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2015, 02:21 PM
  #185811  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
757-300, 220+ people on board, pull into gate and shut down the APU ASAP even if they don't have air on board the jet yet. Oh yeah! Great idea! Awesome! Save gas! Screw passengers, they didn't pay for comfort. Well, maybe we care about comfort, 'like how's the ride?' 20x in flight and dammit you better get up and tell them goodbye in case they fill out a survey, but as far as AC, let em burn.

Not just 757. Had crews doing that out west on the 717 and this week on an 88 when I was deadheading.

I don't get it. Why? Why why why why, WHY?


Standby for rant about people seeing no problem with being 2000 agl 17 miles from an airport at 250 knots.

Your talking about SLC right? Aircraft at 15,000 go over a 13,000 peak and get a spike on the radalt.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:22 PM
  #185812  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
757-300, 220+ people on board, pull into gate and shut down the APU ASAP even if they don't have air on board the jet yet. Oh yeah! Great idea! Awesome! Save gas! Screw passengers, they didn't pay for comfort. Well, maybe we care about comfort, 'like how's the ride?' 20x in flight and dammit you better get up and tell them goodbye in case they fill out a survey, but as far as AC, let em burn.

Not just 757. Had crews doing that out west on the 717 and this week on an 88 when I was deadheading.

I don't get it. Why? Why why why why, WHY?


Standby for rant about people seeing no problem with being 2000 agl 17 miles from an airport at 250 knots.

If you are the CA then I would ask why you are ignoring the company guidelines. If your the FO I would politely point out that the company places passenger comfort behind only safety in the list of priorities.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:22 PM
  #185813  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
That's not correct. It was 24 hours off. Did not matter where. The big difference from a domestic standpoint was you could not exceed 30 block hours in 7 days. That tended to spread domestic hours around more.
Exactly. The fact that 404yxl jumps in every time we bring this up and tells us we are crazy and 117 is way better tells me he never worked under the old rules and ran into the 30 in 7 violation. Every regional pilot in the world had that at least a couple times a month pre 117.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:22 PM
  #185814  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
You and I have went down this road before and you are wrong.

It is not a contract issue. 117 did away with the 30 block hour limit in 7 days and replaced it with a 30 hour rest in 168 hour rolling period. After our last go around I don't think you really worked for an airline pre 117 because anyone who did knows 117 made it WAY easier for companies to schedule us for consecutive days in a row. It has NOTHING to do with the required break in duty, but the 30 hour block limit in 7 days disappearing.
You're talking about two different things here. 30 hours in 7 replaced 24 hours in 7. 30 hours of block in 7 days was replaced with a 60 hours of flight duty in 7 days.

You were arguing that pre-117 was better because you were guaranteed a day off in base. That was never the case. It only guaranteed 24 hours free from duty. 117 requires more, 30 hours of rest, so I don't see your gripe with that issue. I'll ask you again, didn't 12 day trips exist pre-117?

While 117 did eliminate the 30 hours of block hours in 7 days, it gave us 60 hours of flight duty limit in 7 days. The old rules could have allowed 80+ hours of flight duty in 7 days.

I also worked 121 pre-117 and I have had a lot more time at home and more rest during trips than pre-117.

Originally Posted by hammer189
I remember the old 24 hrs off had to be in BASE but now it's 30 hrs off anywhere, even on a layover. This was not an improvement.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
That's not correct. It was 24 hours off. Did not matter where. The big difference from a domestic standpoint was you could not exceed 30 block hours in 7 days. That tended to spread domestic hours around more.
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
Exactly. The fact that 404yxl jumps in every time we bring this up and tells us we are crazy and 117 is way better tells me he never worked under the old rules and ran into the 30 in 7 violation. Every regional pilot in the world had that at least a couple times a month pre 117.
I didn't mention anything about you being crazy. As for you agreeing with Sailing, he stated the same thing I was, there was no requirement for 24 hours off in base pre-117. Your earlier statement was getting on the pre-117 rules guaranteeing you a day off in base every 7 days and I just corrected you that it was 24 hours free from duty. Now you are talking about 30 hours of block in 7, which is a different issue. I don't disagree that went away, but we also had no limit on flight duty in the 7 days pre-117, and now we have a 60 hour limit.
404yxl is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:29 PM
  #185815  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
You're talking about two different things here. 30 hours in 7 replaced 24 hours in 7. 30 hours of block in 7 days was replaced with a 60 hours of flight duty in 7 days.

You were arguing that pre-117 was better because you were guaranteed a day off in base. That was never the case. It only guaranteed 24 hours free from duty. 117 requires more, 30 hours of rest, so I don't see your gripe with that issue. I'll ask you again, didn't 12 day trips exist pre-117?

While 117 did eliminate the 30 hours of block hours in 7 days, it gave us 60 hours of flight duty limit in 7 days. The old rules could have allowed 80+ hours of flight duty in 7 days.

I also worked 121 pre-117 and I have had a lot more time at home and more rest during trips than pre-117.
I don't care what replaced what, the fact is that pre 117 the 30 in 7 block hour limit basically guaranteed you a day at home every 7 days. Removing that now allows companies to back up trips keeping you on the road domestically for as long as they can find you a 30 hour layover.

We have never been guaranteed rest at home, but the block hour rule didn't allow them to schedule you for more than 4.3 hours of average block per day before you had to have a day off which ended up being at home because they couldn't schedule you for more than that. We all used the trick of backing trips up as close as we could and getting 29:30 block within 7 days. Then you tried to get 30 minutes over block sometime in the first 6 days and you got an extra day off when they had to drop a day because you were over 30 hours block.

The 30 in 7 block hour limit was the biggest scheduling issue airlines ran into domestically pre 117. The fact that it is gone tells you who had the most lobbying dollars during 117......ALPA......wait I meant the Airlines.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:34 PM
  #185816  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TenYearsGone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
That's not correct. It was 24 hours off. Did not matter where. The big difference from a domestic standpoint was you could not exceed 30 block hours in 7 days. That tended to spread domestic hours around more.
I am almost positive layovers or deadheads under the old rules did not count for your 24 hours off of duty in 7 days of duty(International was different). Basically, he is right. THe old rules guaranteed you at least 24 hours off at home in 7 days of duty (^^^look below from FAR)

Currently, as long as you know ahead of time (THAT IS THE KEY), the company can use you around the system for as long as they like until you hit your times.

117 allows you to be away from home for longer period of times as compared to the old rules.

TEN


^^Duty period means the period of elapsed time between reporting for an assignment involving flight time and release from that assignment by the certificate holder conducting domestic, flag, or supplemental operations. The time is calculated using either Coordinated Universal Time or local time to reflect the total elapsed time.
Rest period means the period free of all restraint or duty for a certificate holder conducting domestic, flag, or supplemental operations and free of all responsibility for work or duty should the occasion arise.
TenYearsGone is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:36 PM
  #185817  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
I don't care what replaced what, the fact is that pre 117 the 30 in 7 block hour limit basically guaranteed you a day at home every 7 days. Removing that now allows companies to back up trips keeping you on the road domestically for as long as they can find you a 30 hour layover.

We have never been guaranteed rest at home, but the block hour rule didn't allow them to schedule you for more than 4.3 hours of average block per day before you had to have a day off which ended up being at home because they couldn't schedule you for more than that. We all used the trick of backing trips up as close as we could and getting 29:30 block within 7 days. Then you tried to get 30 minutes over block sometime in the first 6 days and you got an extra day off when they had to drop a day because you were over 30 hours block.
The companies could back trips up under the old rules too. To add to that, you could have gotten 80+ hours of flight duty every 7 days, while the new rules limits that to 60 hours.

I don't know why you think it was impossible to work over 6 days in a row under the old rules. Imagine you are a reserve pilot and you get a lot of DH flying and/or short flying days with 2-3 hours. Very easy to work every single day of a 13 day stretch and only receive 1 actual 24 hour layover. During that 13 day stretch you could have seen 160+ hours of flight duty. 117 would limit that to 120 hours and 190 hours in the last 28 days. The old rules could have allowed 360+ hours of flight duty in 28 days.

While we're on this subject, the old rules allowed your 8 scheduled block hour day to turn into 12+ hours. 117 limits it to 9 hard hours. No good-to-start, good-to-finish.
404yxl is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:39 PM
  #185818  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
The companies could back trips up under the old rules too. To add to that, you could have gotten 80+ hours of flight duty every 7 days, while the new rules limits that to 60 hours.

I don't know why you think it was impossible to work over 6 days in a row under the old rules. Imagine you are a reserve pilot and you get a lot of DH flying and/or short flying days with 2-3 hours. Very easy to work every single day of a 13 day stretch and only receive 1 actual 24 hour layover. During that 13 day stretch you could have seen 160+ hours of flight duty. 117 would limit that to 120 hours and 190 hours in the last 28 days. The old rules could have allowed 360+ hours of flight duty in 28 days.
Who did you work for pre 117?
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:42 PM
  #185819  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
Who did you work for pre 117?
I'm curious to why it matters. I am just stating the what it was pre-117. There were regionals that went to bottom of the FAA requirement, while others didn't.

Don't you think it is a good thing that we don't see a 8 hour block day turn into 12 hours and that it is limited to a hard 9 hours now? That our 24 hours of rest in 7, turned into 30 hours?
404yxl is offline  
Old 10-29-2015, 02:45 PM
  #185820  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TenYearsGone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
The companies could back trips up under the old rules too. To add to that, you could have gotten 80+ hours of flight duty every 7 days, while the new rules limits that to 60 hours.

I don't know why you think it was impossible to work over 6 days in a row under the old rules. Imagine you are a reserve pilot and you get a lot of DH flying and/or short flying days with 2-3 hours. Very easy to work every single day of a 13 day stretch and only receive 1 actual
24 hour layover
. During that 13 day stretch you could have seen 160+ hours of flight duty. 117 would limit that to 120 hours and 190 hours in the last 28 days. The old rules could have allowed 360+ hours of flight duty in 28 days.

While we're on this subject, the old rules allowed your 8 scheduled block hour day to turn into 12+ hours. 117 limits it to 9 hard hours. No good-to-start, good-to-finish.
Unless I am wrong, Layover counted as being under the company's watch thus not satisfying the 24 hours off of duty in 7.

TEN
TenYearsGone is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices