Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009, 08:16 PM
  #18451  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Wanted: Pilot Role Models

Even during difficult times, airline pilots do an outstanding job fulfilling ALPA’s motto, “Schedule with Safety.” With ALPA’s recently renewed emphasis on fostering the highest level of professionalism and adherence to the Code of Ethics—and the Association’s same commitment to the U.S. Congress, the FAA administrator, and the traveling public—Air Line Pilot is looking for “a few good men and women” to profile as superlative examples of day-in, day-out professionals flying the line. Please send us the names of pilots you believe exemplify the best characteristics of our profession; submissions should be forwarded to [email protected].
When recommending one of your peers, please explain how the pilot:

upholds the ideals contained in the ALPA Code of Ethics;

brings honor to the profession whether in or out of uniform;

is someone others respect, emulate, and want to learn from;

not only performs exceptionally well as a pilot, but also advocates for the profession;

truly enjoys being an airline pilot on a day-to-day basis; and

embraces the responsibilities of an airline pilot.


I know a few guys I am going to recommend!
I'm in. I can do that (and do on a regular basis).
buzzpat is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:41 AM
  #18452  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by yamahas3
I don't have a dog in this fight, I'm not affiliated with Delta in any way.

If you look at how many RJs are flying around with "DELTA" painted on the side (probably nearly half of all the RJs in the country) and how happy he seems to let every other pilot group on Earth do Delta's flying for them, it seems pretty obvious that this man needs to go.
Agreed 100% Time for LM to return to the line and get some time at the hold short behind a trail of RJs.
reddog25 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:46 AM
  #18453  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Agreed 100% Time for LM to return to the line and get some time at the hold short behind a trail of RJs.
The man is Kennedy based...I assure you, he gets his time in line. Plenty of RJ's up here still.
Professor is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:54 AM
  #18454  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Well... it seems it depends on who you ask. Apparently the O&D market out of Tokyo HND is vast enough that it warrants a $1 BILLION investment in a failing carrier to obtain those rights. (mild sarcasm) It seems that those 5th freedom rights that we enjoy out of NRT are nothing compared to that little gem.
The 5th Freedom rights apply to any Japanese airport including HND. The only restriction are slots. It looks like the max T/O slots at HND that are going to be allowed to ANY US carrier is 4 per day. Not much of a deal for 1 billion dollars. If the JV goes thru it won't be DAL pilots flying out of HND
reddog25 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:56 AM
  #18455  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
The 5th Freedom rights apply to any Japanese airport including HND. The only restriction are slots. It looks like the max T/O slots at HND that are going to be allowed to ANY US carrier is 4 per day. Not much of a deal for 1 billion dollars. If the JV goes thru it won't be DAL pilots flying out of HND
Just as a reminder, 5th Freedom "rights" aren't exactly rights. They are negotiated as part of an aviation treaty between two governments. That treaty is being renegotiated at this time. Hopefully it will result in an aviation enhancement, not Japanese protectionism.
slowplay is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:58 AM
  #18456  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Agreed 100% Time for LM to return to the line and get some time at the hold short behind a trail of RJs.
Just a reminder that scope has been tightened since Moak has been your MEC chairman, and that the total number of RJ's flying under DCI/Airlink colors has decreased substantially. Delta is capped on the number of 70-76 seat aircraft without substantial mainline growth.
slowplay is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 08:52 AM
  #18457  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,596
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Just a reminder that scope has been tightened since Moak has been your MEC chairman, and that the total number of RJ's flying under DCI/Airlink colors has decreased substantially. Delta is capped on the number of 70-76 seat aircraft without substantial mainline growth.
Not to mention that LM was not part of the MEC that allowed the EMB170/175's on the property when the airline was not in chapter 11 and not facing a 1113 motion.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:24 AM
  #18458  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Just a reminder that scope has been tightened since Moak has been your MEC chairman, and that the total number of RJ's flying under DCI/Airlink colors has decreased substantially. Delta is capped on the number of 70-76 seat aircraft without substantial mainline growth.
Maybe it should read," Scope hasn't been loosened since Moak has been the MEC chair."
Also, the number of RJ's flying has decreased b/c the COMPANY made the decision due to poor economics...not b/c Moak, ALPA, or the pilots have demanded, negotiated, or just plan wanted the decrease.
sinca3 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:26 AM
  #18459  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,169
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Just a reminder that scope has been tightened since Moak has been your MEC chairman, and that the total number of RJ's flying under DCI/Airlink colors has decreased substantially. Delta is capped on the number of 70-76 seat aircraft without substantial mainline growth.
Slow,

While I respect your insights and opinions, you've GOT TO stop using this line as a defense of Moak's and the MEC's scope stance. I agree they have done an outstanding job with the merger, SLI, etc, but the ONLY reason we have seen a "substantial" decrease in RJ flying is the economics of the 50 seater. If it were economically feasible and/or advantageous to the company for some other reason (stick it to labor during section 6 maybe) then every single one of those parked RJ's could come back.

We need to take our very next opportunity to cinch up the RJ limits while they are down. It wouldn't cost the company anything (other than future flexibility) to agree to cap RJ's at their current number - don't have that number readily available - as opposed to the number our scope allows.

Oh yeah, and once and for all maybe they could communicate their stance on scope, so we could all sleep a little better at night. I'm still not convinced that a deal won't be reached to allow CPZ or RAH 190/195's for a "short time" to bridge the gap to our "100 seaters." I would love to hear something official regarding our stance along the lines of NOT ONE MORE SEAT, NOT ONE MORE POUND, NOR ONE MORE AIRFRAME OVER THE CURRENT LIMITS. This may be our stance (and absolutely should be), but we'd never know since it hasn't been communicated. With your insight to the workings/stances of the MEC, can you make me/us feel better about this?

It's not real comfortable with the threat coming from both sides (NB and WB's.)
LeineLodge is online now  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:37 AM
  #18460  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,169
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
Maybe it should read," Scope hasn't been loosened since Moak has been the MEC chair."
Also, the number of RJ's flying has decreased b/c the COMPANY made the decision due to poor economics...not b/c Moak, ALPA, or the pilots have demanded, negotiated, or just plan wanted the decrease.

You beat me to it. I'm always too long-winded.
LeineLodge is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices