Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
05-18-2015, 10:03 AM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
05-18-2015, 10:08 AM
The Brown Dot +1
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
05-18-2015, 10:37 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 264
100 seat flying?
So, I recently flew with a guy who seemed to be pretty sure that part of our new TA involves an order for several 90-100 seat airplanes, which also meant the parking of more 50 seaters, and possibly some relief on the addition of 76 seaters.
Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.
Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.
05-18-2015, 10:57 AM
Bye Bye Maddog!
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Movin' On UP........
Posts: 560
Probably replacement jets for the 88-90 fleet!
And so it goes...........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.downhill for pay purposes!
And so it goes...........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.downhill for pay purposes!
05-18-2015, 10:57 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
So, I recently flew with a guy who seemed to be pretty sure that part of our new TA involves an order for several 90-100 seat airplanes, which also meant the parking of more 50 seaters, and possibly some relief on the addition of 76 seaters.
Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.
Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.
05-18-2015, 11:36 AM
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
05-18-2015, 11:39 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
It should not be, as it is a number derived from a specific and objective formula. If it ever does appear to be manipulated, I would strongly recommend calling the MEC Scheduling Committee and letting them know.
05-18-2015, 11:44 AM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
So, I recently flew with a guy who seemed to be pretty sure that part of our new TA involves an order for several 90-100 seat airplanes, which also meant the parking of more 50 seaters, and possibly some relief on the addition of 76 seaters.
Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.
Haven't seen anyone on here talk about that scenario much. I don't like the idea of more 76 seaters, but if we can get 100 seaters on property as growth, I think we'll come out ahead.
And if they need relief on 76 seaters they can have some. In fact, how many 76 seaters do they need? They can have them. As many as they want.
As long as we fly them.
05-18-2015, 11:55 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
05-18-2015, 12:10 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
As long as there is iron clad language RE larger mainline A/C if we fly them. Otherwise we will see more downsizing. We all know how ironclad DALPA crafts the language RE scope/JV. I would be skeptical.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
